Java Thread
Java Thread
Answer.
Threads consumes CPU in best possible manner, hence enables multi processing. Multi
threading reduces idle time of CPU which improves performance of application.
We can create multiple threads in java, even if we don’t create any Thread, one Thread at
least do exist i.e. main thread.
Advantage of Thread : Suppose one thread needs 10 minutes to get certain task, 10
threads used at a time could complete that task in 1 minute, because threads can run
parallely.
Thread are subdivision of Process. One or more Threads runs in the context of process. Threads
can execute any part of process. And same part of process can be executed by multiple Threads.
Processes have their own copy of the data segment of the parent process while Threads have
direct access to the data segment of its process.
Processes have their own address while Threads share the address space of the process that
created it.
Process creation needs whole lot of stuff to be done, we might need to copy whole parent
process, but Thread can be easily created.
Processes can easily communicate with child processes but interprocess communication is
difficult. While, Threads can easily communicate with other threads of the same process using
wait() and notify() methods.
In process all threads share system resource like heap Memory etc. while Thread has its own
stack.
Any change made to process does not affect child processes, but any change made to thread can
affect the behavior of the other threads of the process.
Example to see where threads on are created on different processes and same process.
Answer. This is very basic threading question. Threads can be created in two ways i.e. by
implementing java.lang.Runnable interface or extending java.lang.Thread class and then
extending run method.
Thread has its own variables and methods, it lives and dies on the heap. But a thread of execution
is an individual process that has its own call stack. Thread are lightweight process in java.
2) And then create Thread object by calling constructor and passing reference of Runnable
interface i.e. runnable object :
Question 4 . Does Thread implements their own Stack, if yes how? (Important)
Answer. Yes, Threads have their own stack. This is very interesting question, where interviewer
tends to check your basic knowledge about how threads internally maintains their own stacks.
I’ll be explaining you the concept by diagram.
Question 5. We should implement Runnable interface or extend Thread class. What are
differences between implementing Runnable and extending Thread?
Answer. Well the answer is you must extend Thread only when you are looking to modify run()
and other methods as well. If you are simply looking to modify only the run() method
implementing Runnable is the best option (Runnable interface has only one abstract method i.e.
run() ).
1. Multiple inheritance in not allowed in java : When we implement Runnable interface we can
extend another class as well, but if we extend Thread class we cannot extend any other class
because java does not allow multiple inheritance. So, same work is done by implementing
Runnable and extending Thread but in case of implementing Runnable we are still left with
option of extending some other class. So, it’s better to implement Runnable.
2. Thread safety : When we implement Runnable interface, same object is shared amongst
multiple threads, but when we extend Thread class each and every thread gets associated with
new object.
3. Inheritance (Implementing Runnable is lightweight operation) : When we extend Thread
unnecessary all Thread class features are inherited, but when we implement Runnable interface
no extra feature are inherited, as Runnable only consists only of one abstract method i.e. run()
method. So, implementing Runnable is lightweight operation.
4. Coding to interface : Even java recommends coding to interface. So, we must implement
Runnable rather than extending thread. Also, Thread class implements Runnable interface.
5. Don’t extend unless you wanna modify fundamental behaviour of class, Runnable interface has
only one abstract method i.e. run() : We must extend Thread only when you are looking to
modify run() and other methods as well. If you are simply looking to modify only the run()
method implementing Runnable is the best option (Runnable interface has only one abstract
method i.e. run() ). We must not extend Thread class unless we're looking to modify
fundamental behaviour of Thread class.
6. Flexibility in code when we implement Runnable : When we extend Thread first a fall all thread
features are inherited and our class becomes direct subclass of Thread , so whatever action we
are doing is in Thread class. But, when we implement Runnable we create a new thread and
pass runnable object as parameter,we could pass runnable object to executorService & much
more. So, we have more options when we implement Runnable and our code becomes more
flexible.
7. ExecutorService : If we implement Runnable, we can start multiple thread created on runnable
object with ExecutorService (because we can start Runnable object with new threads), but not
in the case when we extend Thread (because thread can be started only once).
Answer. The solution to question is quite simple, Thread behaviour is unpredictable because
execution of Threads depends on Thread scheduler, thread scheduler may have different
implementation on different platforms like windows, unix etc. Same threading program may
produce different output in subsequent executions even on same platform.
To achieve we are going to create 2 threads on same Runnable Object, create for loop in run()
method and start both threads. There is no surety that which threads will complete first, both
threads will enter anonymously in for loop.
Answer. Threads are lightweight process only if threads of same process are executing
concurrently. But if threads of different processes are executing concurrently then threads are
heavy weight process.
Question 8. How can you ensure all threads that started from main must end in order in
which they started and also main should end in last? (Important)
Answer. Interviewers tend to know interviewees knowledge about Thread methods. So this is
time to prove your point by answering correctly. We can use join() methodto ensure all threads
that started from main must end in order in which they started and also main should end in last.In
other words waits for this thread to die. Calling join() method internally calls join(0);
DETAILED DESCRIPTION : Join() method - ensure all threads that started from main must end
in order in which they started and also main should end in last. Types of join() method with
programs- 10 salient features of join.
Question 9.What is difference between starting thread with run() and start() method?
(Important)
Answer. This is quite interesting question, it might confuse you a bit and at time may make you
think is there really any difference between starting thread with run() and start() method.
When you call start() method, main thread internally calls run() method to start newly created
Thread, so run() method is ultimately called by newly created thread.
When you call run() method main thread rather than starting run() method with newly thread it
start run() method by itself.
Answer. Java allows threads to access shared variables. As a rule, to ensure that shared variables
are consistently updated, a thread should ensure that it has exclusive use of such variables by
obtaining a lock that enforces mutual exclusion for those shared variables.
If a field is declared volatile, in that case the Java memory model ensures that all threads see a
consistent value for the variable.
1. No, synchronized can be used only with methods, i.e. in method declaration.
Question 11. Differences between synchronized and volatile keyword in Java? (Important)
1. Volatilecan be used as a keyword against the variable, we cannot use volatile against
method declaration.
volatile void method1(){} //it’s illegal, compilation error.
Synchronized method:
Synchronized block:
void method2(){
synchronized (this) {
1. Volatile does not acquire any lock on variable or object, but Synchronization acquires
lock on method or block in which it is used.
1. Volatile variables are not cached, but variables used inside synchronized method or block
are cached.
1. When volatile is used will never create deadlock in program, as volatile never obtains any
kind of lock . But in case if synchronization is not done properly, we might end up
creating dedlock in program.
1. Synchronization may cost us performance issues, as one thread might be waiting for
another thread to release lock on object. But volatile is never expensive in terms of
performance.
Thinking of starting thread again and calling start() method on it (which internally is going to
call run() method) for us is some what like asking dead man to wake up and run. As, after
completing his life person goes to dead state.
Question 13. What is race condition in multithreading and how can we solve it?
(Important)
Answer. This is very important question, this forms the core of multi threading, you should be
able to explain about race condition in detail. When more than one thread try to access same
resource without synchronization causes race condition.
So we can solve race condition by using either synchronized block or synchronized method.
When no two threads can access same resource at a time phenomenon is also called as mutual
exclusion.
When two threads try to read on same resource without synchronization, it’s never going to
create any problem.
When two threads try to write to same resource without synchronization, it’s going to create
synchronization problems.
Answer. This is very must know question for all the interviewees, you will most probably face
this question in almost every time you go for interview.
Threads can communicate with each other by using wait(), notify() and notifyAll() methods.
Question 15. Why wait(), notify() and notifyAll() are in Object class and not in Thread
class? (Important)
Answer.
1. Every Object has a monitor, acquiring that monitors allow thread to hold lock on object.
But Thread class does not have any monitors.
1. wait(), notify() and notifyAll()are called on objects only >When wait() method is called
on object by thread it waits for another thread on that object to release object monitor by
calling notify() or notifyAll() method on that object.
When notify() method is called on object by thread it notifies all the threads
which are waiting for that object monitor that object monitor is available now.
So, this shows that wait(), notify() and notifyAll() are called on objects only.
Now, Straight forward question that comes to mind is how thread acquires object lock by
acquiring object monitor? Let’s try to understand this basic concept in detail?
1. Wait(), notify() and notifyAll() method being in Object class allows all the threads created on
that object to communicate with other. .
2. As multiple threads exists on same object. Only one thread can hold object monitor at a time. As
a result thread can notify other threads of same object that lock is available now. But, thread
having these methods does not make any sense because multiple threads exists on object its not
other way around (i.e. multiple objects exists on thread).
3. Now let’s discuss one hypothetical scenario, what will happen if Thread class contains wait(),
notify() and notifyAll() methods?
Having wait(), notify() and notifyAll() methods means Thread class also must have their
monitor.
>Synchronization on object won’t be possible- Because object has monitor, one object can have
multiple threads and thread hold lock on object by holding object monitor. But if each thread will
have monitor, we won’t have any way of achieving synchronization.
Question 16. Is it important to acquire object lock before calling wait(), notify() and
notifyAll()?
Answer.Yes, it’s mandatory to acquire object lock before calling these methods on object. As
discussed above wait(), notify() and notifyAll() methods are always called from Synchronized
block only, and as soon as thread enters synchronized block it acquires object lock (by holding
object monitor). If we call these methods without acquiring object lock i.e. from outside
synchronize block then java.lang. IllegalMonitorStateException is thrown at runtime.
Wait() method needs to enclosed in try-catch block, because it throws compile time exception
i.e. InterruptedException.
Question 17. How can you solve consumer producer problem by using wait() and notify()
method? (Important)
Answer. Here come the time to answer very very important question from interview perspective.
Interviewers tends to check how sound you are in threads inter communication. Because for
solving this problem we got to use synchronization blocks, wait() and notify() method very
cautiously. If you misplace synchronization block or any of the method, that may cause your
program to go horribly wrong. So, before going into this question first i’ll recommend you to
understand how to use synchronized blocks, wait() and notify() methods.
>Producer will produce total of 10 products and cannot produce more than 2 products at a time
until products are being consumed by consumer.
Example> when sharedQueue’s size is 2, wait for consumer to consume (consumer will consume
by calling remove(0) method on sharedQueue and reduce sharedQueue’s size). As soon as size is
less than 2, producer will start producing.
>Consumer can consume only when there are some products to consume.
Example> when sharedQueue’s size is 0, wait for producer to produce (producer will produce by
calling add() method on sharedQueue and increase sharedQueue’s size). As soon as size is
greater than 0, consumer will start consuming.
We will create sharedQueue that will be shared amongst Producer and Consumer. We will now
start consumer and producer thread.
Note: it does not matter order in which threads are started (because rest of code has taken care of
synchronization and key points mentioned above)
consumerThread.start();
consumerThread will enter run method and call consume() method. There it will check for
sharedQueue’s size.
-if size is equal to 0 that means producer hasn’t produced any product, wait for producer to
produce by using below piece of code-
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
while (sharedQueue.size() == 0) {
sharedQueue.wait();
-if size is greater than 0, consumer will start consuming by using below piece of code.
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
Thread.sleep((long)(Math.random() * 2000));
sharedQueue.notify();
}
Than we will start producerThread >
producerThread.start();
producerThread will enter run method and call produce() method. There it will check for
sharedQueue’s size.
-if size is equal to 2 (i.e. maximum number of products which sharedQueue can hold at a time),
wait for consumer to consume by using below piece of code-
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
sharedQueue.wait();
-if size is less than 2, producer will start producing by using below piece of code.
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
sharedQueue.add(i);
Thread.sleep((long)(Math.random() * 1000));
sharedQueue.notify();
DETAILED DESCRIPTION with program : Solve Consumer Producer problem by using wait()
and notify() methods in multithreading.
Question 18. How to solve Consumer Producer problem without using wait() and notify()
methods, where consumer can consume only when production is over.?
Answer. In this problem, producer will allow consumer to consume only when 10 products have
been produced (i.e. when production is over).
We will approach by keeping one boolean variable productionInProcess and initially setting it to
true, and later when production will be over we will set it to false.
Question 19. How can you solve consumer producer pattern by using BlockingQueue?
(Important)
Answer. Now it’s time to gear up to face question which is most probably going to be followed
up by previous question i.e. after how to solve consumer producer problem using wait() and
notify() method. Generally you might wonder why interviewer's are so much interested in asking
about solving consumer producer problem using BlockingQueue, answer is they want to know
how strong knowledge you have about java concurrent Api’s, this Api use consumer producer
pattern in very optimized manner, BlockingQueue is designed is such a manner that it offer us
the best performance.
Answer. This is very important question from interview perspective. But, what makes this
question important is it checks interviewees capability of creating and detecting deadlock. If you
can write a code to form deadlock, than I am sure you must be well capable in solving that
deadlock as well. If not, later on this post we will learn how to solve deadlock as well.
First question comes to mind is, what is deadlock in multi threading program?
Deadlock is a situation where two threads are waiting for each other to release lock holded by
them on resources.
Thread-1 acquires lock on String.class and then calls sleep() method which gives Thread-2 the
chance to execute immediately after Thread-1 has acquired lock on String.class and Thread-2
acquires lock on Object.class then calls sleep() method and now it waits for Thread-1 to release
lock on String.class.
Conclusion:
Now, Thread-1 is waiting for Thread-2 to release lock on Object.class and Thread-2 is waiting
for Thread-1 to release lock on String.class and deadlock is formed.
synchronized (String.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (Object.class) {
publicvoid run() {
synchronized (Object.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (String.class) {
}
Here comes the important part, how above formed deadlock could be solved :
Thread-1 acquires lock on String.class and then calls sleep() method which gives Thread-2 the
chance to execute immediately after Thread-1 has acquired lock on String.class and Thread-2
tries to acquire lock on String.class but lock is holded by Thread-1. Meanwhile, Thread-1
completes successfully. As Thread-1 has completed successfully it releases lock on String.class,
Thread-2 can now acquire lock on String.class and complete successfully without any deadlock
formation.
publicvoid run() {
synchronized (String.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (Object.class) {
publicvoid run() {
synchronized (String.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (Object.class) {
1. Lock specific member variables of class rather than locking whole class: We must try to
lock specific member variables of class rather than locking whole class.
1. Use join() method: If possible try touse join() method, although it may refrain us from
taking full advantage of multithreading environment because threads will start and end
sequentially, but it can be handy in avoiding deadlocks.
Question 21. Have you ever generated thread dumps or analyzed Thread Dumps?
(Important)
Answer. Answering this questions will show your in depth knowledge of Threads. Every
experienced must know how to generate Thread Dumps.
VisualVM is most popular way to generate Thread Dump and is most widely used by
developers. It’s important to understand usage of VisualVM for in depth knowledge of
VisualVM. I’ll recommend every developer must understand this topic to become master in
multi threading.
It helps us in analyzing threads performance, thread states, CPU consumed by threads, garbage
collection and much more. For detailed information see Generating and analyzing Thread
Dumps using VisualVM - step by step detail to setup VisualVM with screenshots
jstack is very easy way to generate Thread dump and is widely used by developers. I’ll
recommend every developer must understand this topic to become master in multi threading. For
creating Thread dumps we need not to download any jar or any extra software. For detailed
information see Generating and analyzing Thread Dumps using JSATCK - step by step detail to
setup JSTACK with screenshots.
Question 22. What is life cycle of Thread, explain thread states? (Important)
Answer. Thread states/ Thread life cycle is very basic question, before going deep into concepts
we must understand Thread life cycle.
New
Runnable
Running
Waiting/blocked/sleeping
Terminated (Dead)
New : When instance of thread is created using new operator it is in new state, but the start()
method has not been invoked on the thread yet, thread is not eligible to run yet.
Running : Thread scheduler selects thread to go fromrunnable to running state. In running state
Thread starts executing by entering run() method.
>Thread is still alive, but currently it’s not eligible to run. In other words.
By calling wait()method thread go from running to waiting state. In waiting state it will wait for
other threads to release object monitor/lock.
Terminated (Dead) : A thread is considered dead when its run() method completes.
Question 23. Are you aware of preemptive scheduling and time slicing?
Answer. In preemptive scheduling, the highest priority thread executes until it enters into the
waiting or dead state.
In time slicing, a thread executes for a certain predefined time and then enters runnable pool.
Than thread can enter running state when selected by thread scheduler.
Answer.Daemon threads are low priority threads which runs intermittently in background for
doing garbage collection.
Daemon threads are service oriented threads, they serves all other threads.
These threads are created before user threads are created and die after all other user
threads dies.
we can use isDaemon() method to check whether thread is daemon thread or not.
we can use setDaemon(boolean on) method to make any user method a daemon thread.
You may like to see how daemon threads work, for that you can use VisualVM or jStack.
I have provided Thread dumps over there which shows daemon threads which were
intermittently running in background.
Some of the daemon threads which intermittently run in background are >
"RMI TCP Connection(3)-10.175.2.71" daemon"RMI TCP Connection(idle)" daemon"RMI
Scheduler(0)" daemon"C2 CompilerThread1" daemon
Answer.Suspend() method is deadlock prone. If the target thread holds a lock on object when it
is suspended, no thread can lock this object until the target thread is resumed. If the thread that
would resume the target thread attempts to lock this monitor prior to calling resume, it results in
deadlock formation.
Suspend() method puts thread from running to waiting state. And thread can go from waiting to
runnable state only when resume() method is called on thread. It is deprecated method.
Resume() method is only used with suspend() method that’s why it’s also deprecated method.
Answer. This question is again going to check your in depth knowledge of thread methods i.e.
destroy() method is deadlock prone. If the target thread holds a lock on object when it is
destroyed, no thread can lock this object (Deadlock formed are similar to deadlock formed when
suspend() and resume() methods are used improperly). It results in deadlock formation. These
deadlocksare generally called Frozen processes.
Additionally you must know calling destroy() method on Threads throw runtimeException i.e.
NoSuchMethodError. Destroy() method puts thread from running to dead state.
Question 27. As stop() method is deprecated, How can we terminate or stop infinitely
running thread in java? (Important)
Answer. This is very interesting question where interviewees thread basics basic will be tested.
Interviewers tend to know user’s knowledge about main thread’s and thread invoked by main
thread.
We will try to address the problem by creating new thread which will run infinitely until certain
condition is satisfied and will be called by main Thread.
Question 28. what is significance of yield() method, what state does it put thread in?
yield() is a native method it’s implementation in java 6 has been changed as compared to its
implementation java 5. As method is native it’s implementation is provided by JVM.
In java 5, yield() method internally used to call sleep() method giving all the other threads of
same or higher priority to execute before yielded thread by leaving allocated CPU for time gap of
15 millisec.
But java 6, calling yield() method gives a hint to the thread scheduler that the current thread is
willing to yield its current use of a processor. The thread scheduler is free to ignore this hint. So,
sometimes even after using yield() method, you may not notice any difference in output.
Definition : yield() method when called on thread gives a hint to the thread scheduler that
the current thread is willing to yield its current use of a processor.The thread scheduler is
free to ignore this hint.
Thread state : when yield() method is called on thread it goes from running to runnable
state, not in waiting state. Thread is eligible to run but not running and could be picked
by scheduler at anytime.
Static method : yield()is a static method, hence calling Thread.yield() causes currently
executing thread to yield.
synchronized block : thread need not to to acquire object lock before calling
yield()method i.e. yield() method can be called from outside synchronized block.
Question 29.What is significance of sleep() method in detail, what statedoes it put thread in
?
Definition : sleep() methods causes current thread to sleep for specified number of
milliseconds (i.e. time passed in sleep method as parameter). Ex- Thread.sleep(10) causes
currently executing thread to sleep for 10 millisec.
Thread state : when sleep() is called on thread it goes from running to waiting state and
can return to runnable state when sleep time is up.
Exception : sleep() method must catch or throw compile time exception i.e.
InterruptedException.
1. sleep(long millis, int nanos) - Causes the currently executing thread to sleep for the
specified number of milliseconds plus the specified number of nanoseconds.
static method : sleep()is a static method, causes the currently executing thread to sleep for
the specified number of milliseconds.
synchronized block : thread need not to to acquire object lock before calling
sleep()method i.e. sleep() method can be called from outside synchronized block.
Answer.
Should be called from synchronized block :wait() method is always called from
synchronized block i.e. wait() method needs to lock object monitor before object on
which it is called. But sleep() method can be called from outside synchronized block i.e.
sleep() method doesn’t need any object monitor.
Belongs to which class : wait() method belongs to java.lang.Object class but sleep()
method belongs to java.lang.Thread class.
Called on object or thread : wait() method is called on objects but sleep() method is called
on Threads not objects.
Thread state : when wait() method is called on object, thread that holded object’s monitor
goes from running to waiting state and can return to runnable state only when notify() or
notifyAll()method is called on that object. And later thread scheduler schedules that
thread to go from from runnable to running state.
when sleep() is called on thread it goes from running to waiting state and can return to runnable
state when sleep time is up.
When called from synchronized block :when wait() method is called thread leaves the
object lock. But sleep()method when called from synchronized block or method thread
doesn’t leaves object lock.
Answer.
Definition : yield() method when called on thread gives a hint to the thread scheduler that
the current thread is willing to yield its current use of a processor.The thread scheduler is
free to ignore this hint. sleep() methods causes current thread to sleep for specified
number of milliseconds (i.e. time passed in sleep method as parameter). Ex-
Thread.sleep(10) causes currently executing thread to sleep for 10 millisec.
Thread state : when sleep() is called on thread it goes from running to waiting state and
can return to runnable state when sleep time is up. when yield() method is called on
thread it goes from running to runnable state, not in waiting state. Thread is eligible to
run but not running and could be picked by scheduler at anytime.
Exception : yield() method need not to catch or throw any exception. But sleep() method
must catch or throw compile time exception i.e. InterruptedException.
Waiting time : yield() method stops thread for unpredictable time, that depends on thread
scheduler. But sleep() method have got few options.
1. sleep(long millis) - Causes the currently executing thread to sleep for the specified
number of milliseconds
2. sleep(long millis, int nanos) - Causes the currently executing thread to sleep for
the specified number of milliseconds plus the specified number of nanoseconds.
> yield() and sleep() method are called on Threads not objects.
Question 32. Mention some guidelines to write thread safe code, most important point we
must take care of in multithreading programs?
Answer. In multithreading environment it’s important very important to write thread safe code,
thread unsafe code can cause a major threat to your application. I have posted many articles
regarding thread safety. So overall this will be revision of what we have learned so far i.e.
writing thread safe healthy code and avoiding any kind of deadlocks.
1. Even static variables are not thread safe, they are used in static methods and if static
methods are not synchronized then thread on same or different object can enter method
concurrently. Multiple threads may exist on same or different objects of class but only
one thread can enter static synchronized method at a time, we must consider making
static methods as synchronized.
1. If possible, try to use volatile variables. If a field is declared volatile all threads see a
consistent value for the variable. Volatile variables at times can be used as alternate to
synchronized methods as well.
1. Final variables are thread safe because once assigned some reference of object they
cannot point to reference of other object.
void method(){
void method(){
1. Usage of local variables : If possible try to use local variables, local variables are thread
safe, because every thread has its own stack, i.e. every thread has its own local variables
and its pushes all the local variables on stack.
void method(){
1. Using thread safe collections : Rather than using ArrayList we must Vector and in place of using
HashMap we must use ConcurrentHashMap or HashTable.
2. We must use VisualVM or jstack to detect problems such as deadlocks and time taken by
threads to complete in multi threading programs.
3. Using ThreadLocal:ThreadLocal is a class which provides thread-local variables. Every thread has
its own ThreadLocal value that makes ThreadLocal value threadsafe as well.
4. Rather than StringBuffer try using immutable classes such as String. Any change to String
produces new String.
Question 33. How thread can enter waiting, sleeping and blocked state and how can they go
to runnable state ?
Answer. This is very prominently asked question in interview which will test your knowledge
about thread states. And it’s very important for developers to have in depth knowledge of this
thread state transition. I will try to explain this thread state transition by framing few sub
questions. I hope reading sub questions will be quite interesting.
By calling wait()method thread go from running to waiting state. In waiting state it will wait for
other threads to release object monitor/lock.
Once notify() or notifyAll()method is called object monitor/lock becomes available and thread
can again return to runnable state.
> How can Thread go from running to sleeping state ?
By calling sleep() methodthread go from running to sleeping state. In sleeping state it will wait
for sleep time to get over.
Once specified sleep time is up thread can again return to runnable state.
Suspend() method can be used to put thread in waiting state and resume() method is the only way
which could put thread in runnable state.
Thread also may go from running to waiting state if it is waiting for some I/O operation to take
place. Once input is available thread may return to running state.
>When threads are in running state, yield()method can make thread to go in Runnable state.
Question 34. Difference between notify() and notifyAll() methods, can you write a code to
prove your point?
Answer. Goodness. Theoretically you must have heard or you must be aware of differences
between notify() and notifyAll().But have you created program to achieve it? If not let’s do it.
First, I will like give you a brief description of what notify() and notifyAll() methods do.
notify()- Wakes up a single thread that is waiting on this object's monitor. If any threads are
waiting on this object, one of them is chosen to be awakened. The choice is random and occurs at
the discretion of the implementation. A thread waits on an object's monitor by calling one of the
wait methods.
The awakened threads will not be able to proceed until the current thread relinquishes the lock on
this object.
notifyAll()- Wakes up all threads that are waiting on this object's monitor. A thread waits on an
object's monitor by calling one of the wait methods.
The awakened threads will not be able to proceed until the current thread relinquishes the lock on
this object.
Question 35. Does thread leaves object lock when sleep() method is called?
Answer. When sleep() method is called Thread does not leaves object lock and goes from
running to waiting state. Thread waits for sleep time to over and once sleep time is up it goes
from waiting to runnable state.
Question 36. Does thread leaves object lock when wait() method is called?
Answer. When wait() method is called Thread leaves the object lock and goes from running to
waiting state. Thread waits for other threads on same object to call notify() or notifyAll() and
once any of notify() or notifyAll() is called it goes from waiting to runnable state and again
acquires object lock.
Answer. This question will test your basic knowledge how start and run methods work internally
in Thread Api.
When we call start() method on thread, it internally calls run() method with newly created thread.
So, if we don’t override run() method newly created thread won’t be called and nothing will
happen.
publicclass DontOverrideRun {
thread1.start();
/*OUTPUT
*/
As we saw in output, we didn’t override run() method that’s why on calling start() method
nothing happened.
Question 38. What will happen if we override start method?
Answer. This question will again test your basic core java knowledge how overriding works at
runtime, what what will be called at runtime and how start and run methods work internally in
Thread Api.
When we call start() method on thread, it internally calls run() method with newly created thread.
So, if we override start() method, run() method will not be called until we write code for calling
run() method.
@Override
publicvoid run() {
@Override
publicvoid start(){
publicclass OverrideStartMethod {
thread1.start();
}
/*OUTPUT
In start() method
*/
If we note output. we have overridden start method and didn’t called run() method from it, so,
run() method wasn’t call.
Question 39. Can we acquire lock on class? What are ways in which you can acquire lock
on class?
Answer. Yes, we can acquire lock on class’s class object in 2 ways to acquire lock on class.
Let’s say there is one class MyClass. Now we can create synchronization block, and parameter
passed with synchronization tells which class has to be synchronized. In below code, we have
synchronized MyClass
synchronized (MyClass.class) {
As soon as thread entered Synchronization method, thread acquired lock on class’s class object.
Answer. It is very important question from multithreading point of view. We must understand
difference between object lock and class lock to answer interview, ocjp answers correctly.
Object lock Class lock
Thread can acquire lock on class’s class
Thread can acquire object lock by- object by-
Question 41. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 and Thread-2) on same object. Thread-1 is
in synchronized method1(), can Thread-2 enter synchronized method2() at same time?
Likewise, Thread-2 even cannot enter synchronized method1() which is being executed by
Thread-1. Thread-2 will have to wait for Thread-1 to release lock on object’s monitor so that it
could enter synchronized method1(). Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 42. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 and Thread-2) on same object. Thread-1 is
in static synchronized method1(), can Thread-2 enter static synchronized method2() at same
time?
Answer.No, here when Thread-1 is in static synchronized method1() it must be holding lock on
class class’s object and will release lock on class’s classobject only when it exits static
synchronized method1(). So, Thread-2 will have to wait for Thread-1 to release lock on class’s
classobject so that it could enter static synchronized method2().
Likewise, Thread-2 even cannot enter static synchronized method1() which is being executed by
Thread-1. Thread-2 will have to wait for Thread-1 to release lock on class’s classobject so that it
could enter static synchronized method1(). Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 43. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 and Thread-2) on same object. Thread-1 is
in synchronized method1(), can Thread-2 enter static synchronized method2() at same time?
Question 44. Suppose you have thread and it is in synchronized method and now can thread
enter other synchronized method from that method?
Answer.Yes, here when thread is in synchronized method it must be holding lock on object’s
monitor and using that lock thread can enter other synchronized method. Now, let’s see a
program to prove our point.
Question 45. Suppose you have thread and it is in static synchronized method and now can
thread enter other static synchronized method from that method?
Answer. Yes, here when thread is in static synchronized method it must be holding lock on
class’s class object and using that lock thread can enter other static synchronized method. Now,
let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 46. Suppose you have thread and it is in static synchronized method and now can
thread enter other non static synchronized method from that method?
Answer.Yes, here when thread is in static synchronized method it must be holding lock on
class’s class object and when it enters synchronized method it will hold lock on object’s monitor
as well.
So, now thread holds 2 locks (it’s also called nested synchronization)-
>second one on object’s monitor (This lock will be released when thread exits non static
method).Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 47. Suppose you have thread and it is in synchronized method and now can thread
enter other static synchronized method from that method?
Answer.Yes, here when thread is in synchronized method it must be holding lock on object’s
monitor and when it enters static synchronized method it will hold lock on class’s class object as
well.
So, now thread holds 2 locks (it’s also called nested synchronization)-
>second one on class’s class object.(This lock will be released when thread exits static
method).Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 48. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 on object1 and Thread-2 on object2).
Thread-1 is in synchronized method1(), can Thread-2 enter synchronized method2() at same
time?
Question 49. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 on object1 and Thread-2 on object2).
Thread-1 is in static synchronized method1(), can Thread-2 enter static synchronized method2()
at same time?
Answer.No, it might confuse you a bit that threads are created on different objects. But, not to
forgot that multiple objects may exist but there is always one class’s class object lock available.
Here, when Thread-1 is in static synchronized method1() it must be holding lock on class class’s
object and will release lock on class’s classobject only when it exits static synchronized
method1(). So, Thread-2 will have to wait for Thread-1 to release lock on class’s classobject so
that it could enter static synchronized method2().
Likewise, Thread-2 even cannot enter static synchronized method1() which is being executed by
Thread-1. Thread-2 will have to wait for Thread-1 to release lock on class’s classobject so that it
could enter static synchronized method1(). Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 50. Difference between wait() and wait(long timeout), What are thread states when
these method are called?
Answer.
Question 51. How can you implement your own Thread Pool in java?
Answer.
What is ThreadPool?
ThreadPool is a pool of threads which reuses a fixed number of threads to execute tasks.
At any point, at most nThreads threads will be active processing tasks. If additional tasks are
submitted when all threads are active, they will wait in the queue until a thread is available.
ThreadPool implementation internally uses LinkedBlockingQueue for adding and removing
tasks.
In this post i will be using LinkedBlockingQueue provide by java Api, you can refer this post for
implementing ThreadPool using custom LinkedBlockingQueue.
Need/Advantage of ThreadPool?
Instead of creating new thread every time for executing tasks, we can create ThreadPool which
reuses a fixed number of threads for executing tasks.
Then, threads will enter run() method of ThreadPoolsThread class and will call take() method on
taskQueue.
If tasks are available thread will execute task by entering run() method of task (As tasks
executed always implements Runnable).
publicvoid run() {
...
while (true) {
...
runnable.run();
...
...
}
When execute() method of ThreadPool is called, it internally calls put() method on taskQueue to
add tasks.
taskQueue.put(task);
Once tasks are available all waiting threads are notified that task is available.
Answer. This question will test your command in multi threading, can you really create some
perfect multithreading application or not. ThreadLocal is a class which provides thread-local
variables.
What is ThreadLocal ?
ThreadLocal is a class which provides thread-local variables. Every thread has its own
ThreadLocal value that makes ThreadLocal value threadsafe as well.
Yes, ThreadLocal variables are thread safe. As every thread has its own ThreadLocal value and
one thread can’t see other threads ThreadLocal value.
Application of ThreadLocal?
1. ThreadLocal are used by many web frameworks for maintaining some context (may be
session or request) related value.
o In any single threaded application, same thread is assigned for every request made
to same action, so ThreadLocal values will be available in next request as well.
o In multi threaded application, different thread is assigned for every request made
to same action, so ThreadLocal values will be different for every request.
1. When threads have started at different time they might like to store time at which they
have started. So, thread’s start time can be stored in ThreadLocal.
We will create instance of ThreadLocal. ThreadLocal is a generic class, i will be using String to
demonstrate threadLocal.
All threads will see same instance of ThreadLocal, but a thread will be able to see value which
was set by it only.
threadLocal.get()
Answer.
When one thread loops continuously waiting for another thread to signal.
Performance point of view - Busy spin is very bad from performance point of view, because one
thread keeps on looping continuously ( and consumes CPU) waiting for another thread to signal.
We must use sleep() or wait() and notify() method. Using wait() is better option.
Why using wait() and notify() is much better option to solve busy spin?
Because in case when we use sleep() method, thread will wake up again and again after specified
sleep time until boolean variable is true. But, in case of wait() thread will wake up only when
when notified by calling notify() or notifyAll(), hence end up consuming CPU in best possible
manner.
Consumer thread continuously execute (busy spin) in while loop tillproductionInProcess is true.
Once producer thread has ended it will make boolean variable productionInProcess false and
busy spin will be over.
while(productionInProcess){
Answer. No, constructor cannot be synchronized. Because constructor is used for instantiating
object, when we are in constructor object is under creation. So, until object is not instantiated it
does not need any synchronization.
Question 55. Can you find whether thread holds lock on object or not?
Answer. holdsLock(object) method can be used to find out whether current thread holds the lock
on monitor of specified object.
holdsLock(object) method returns true if the current thread holds the lock on monitor of
specified object.
Answer. When thread does not enough CPU for its execution Thread starvation happens.
Thread starvation may happen in following scenarios >
Low priority threads gets less CPU (time for execution) as compared to high priority
threads. Lower priority thread may starve away waiting to get enough CPU to perform
calculations.
In deadlock two threads waits for each other to release lock holded by them on resources.
There both Threads starves away to get CPU.
Thread might be waiting indefinitely for lock on object’s monitor (by calling wait()
method), because no other thread is calling notify()/notifAll() method on object. In that
case, Thread starves away to get CPU.
Thread might be waiting indefinitely for lock on object’s monitor (by calling wait()
method), but notify() may be repeatedly awakening some other threads. In that case also
Thread starves away to get CPU.
Once JVM’s shutdown has begunnew shutdown hook cannot be registered neither previously-
registered hook can be de-registered. Any attempt made to do any of these operations causes an
IllegalStateException.
For more detail with program read : Threads addShutdownHook method in java
Question 58. How you can handle uncaught runtime exception generated in run method?
Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(new
Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler(){
});
Question 59. What is ThreadGroup in java, What is default priority of newly created
threadGroup, mention some important ThreadGroup methods ?
Answer. When program starts JVM creates a ThreadGroup named main. Unless specified,
all newly created threads become members of the main thread group.
getName()
o name of ThreadGroup.
activeGroupCount()
o count of active groups in ThreadGroup.
activeCount()
o count of active threads in ThreadGroup.
list()
o list() method has prints ThreadGroups information
getMaxPriority()
o Method returns the maximum priority of ThreadGroup.
setMaxPriority(int pri)
o Sets the maximum priority of ThreadGroup.
Answer.
Thread class provides variables of final static int type for setting thread priority.
publicfinalstaticintMIN_PRIORITY= 1;
publicfinalstaticintNORM_PRIORITY= 5;
publicfinalstaticintMAX_PRIORITY= 10;
Thread with MAX_PRIORITY is likely to get more CPU as compared to low priority threads.
But occasionally low priority thread might get more CPU. Because thread scheduler schedules
thread on discretion of implementation and thread behaviour is totally unpredictable.
Thread with MIN_PRIORITY is likely to get less CPU as compared to high priority threads. But
occasionally high priority thread might less CPU. Because thread scheduler schedules thread on
discretion of implementation and thread behaviour is totally unpredictable.