IPR
IPR
&
Its impact in Indian Market
Few modules like copyrights and patent are quite popular for many
decades but IPR as such never got into public interest. It is like a
remote village (which was initially unknown) become media hot
topic along with a famous personality (Amethi after Sonia Gandhi
contested). In India, the scenario started changing in the beginning
of this decade and steeped up in last few years. It became a topic of
round table discussion in business class citizen after India became
GATT signatory few years back. Consequently, under purview of
WTO and other global organisation, Indian government expanded
IPR functioning across the country. Functioning of IPR has been
restructured and set up in all four main offices metros (Delhi,
Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai) so people easily can access the
information and get help in the registration of intellectual
properties.
The IPR issue has both faces on one side it protects the right of
intellectuals and eventually promotes the new inventions, while on
the other side it promotes monopoly of the company also. You must
be aware that we pay heavy price for even lifesaving drugs although
it costs far less than actual price. We alone do not live on this planet
but along with developed countries like US, UK, Canada, etc and
many other underdeveloped countries like those in Africa. Further,
we must emphasize that we are a trend follower rather than a
trendsetter we accept willingly or unwillingly whatsoever
developed nations ask for. Initially India resisted to not become a
part of IPR regulated market but gave up keeping in mind that we
may also grow up and stand in same queue of developed countries.
CASE STUDY
It is an unquestionable fact that intellectual property does not only regard the individual
creator, but also global growth, which is the result of the overall inventiveness of all
individuals.
This explains why, in the past, the market economy developed thanks to the technological
innovations connected to discoveries in all fields, which were channelled into the
production cycle.
On the other hand, any right is defined and receives protection only within a legal system.
In a legal vacuum, in fact, authentic property does not exist.
Hence the corpus of positive laws which guarantee rights. Thus a system of rules
governing industrial rights have developed, starting from the Industrial Revolution and
evolving in parallel to its development, with regulations introduced by the State which
recognises the right of the person who has researched, studied, applied and promoted
his/her invention alone, at the same time establishing obligations and limits bearing on the
subjects which practise industrial activity in a system which guarantees, among others,
industrial property.
No one denies that scientific discoveries have been made also outside free
states, but only a system of rules and of the protection of property has favoured
the application to industry, and this is, in the first place, by the recognition of profit
as a natural right of the person who has carried out the work of invention,
research, study and application.
2.
The Industrial Revolution and Property Rights.
It must be borne in mind, in general, that not only property right exists within a system which
recognises it as such, but it is also given protection by coercive provisions which protect
against abuse.
From the territorial and geographical aspect, it must be remembered that, at the dawn of
the first industrial revolution, intellectual and industrial property rights were developed within
a context of provisions which were mainly national, during growth in trade extending beyond
national borders, to answer the need for standardised protection, by means of agreements
representing the bases of international law on property. This was necessary, on one hand,
to overcome the differences between legal systems and, on the other, to fill the legal
vacuum of those systems in which there was no regulation.
There are differences between the absolute rights guaranteed by the State: with regard to
material objects the right merely acknowledges the pre-juridical fact, but in the case of
industrial property the law describes, and therefore disciplines, the asset to be protected. In
practice, the actual asset protected is the invention, theindustrial model, the
company's trademarks and distinctive signs and, ultimately, the competition between
entrepreneurs, as well as the guarantee for third parties who access the market as
consumers.
Industrial property law has thus progressively developed, becoming differentiated from the
other property rights and the other legal issues, since it deals with concepts that do not
merely regard regulations but which more strictly regard economic aspects and guarantees.
This is because the exploitation of the intangible assets possessed and their application to
production lead to earnings for the individuals and to profit for the companies, which do not
specifically regard the traditional and static concept of private property.