LINEAR PROGRAMMING

APPLICATIONS
CHAPTER OUTLINE

8.1 Introduction
8.2 Marketing Applications

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

8.3 Manufacturing Applications
8.4 Employee Scheduling Applications
8.5 Financial Applications
8.6 Ingredient Blending Applications
8.7 Transportation Applications

8-2
MARKETING APPLICATIONS

Linear programming models have been used in the

advertising field as a decision aid in selecting an

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

effective media mix.
Media selection problems can be approached with LP
from two perspectives:
Maximize audience exposure.
Minimize advertising costs.

8-3
WIN BIG GAMBLING CLUB
The Win Big Gambling Club promotes gambling
junkets to the Bahamas.
It has $8,000 per week to spend on advertising.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Its goal is to reach the largest possible high-
potential audience.
Media types and audience figures are shown in the
following table.
It needs to place at least five radio spots per week.

No more than $1,800 can be spent on radio

advertising each week.
8-4
WIN BIG GAMBLING CLUB

Advertising options

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

AUDIENCE COST PER MAXIMUM ADS
MEDIUM REACHED PER AD AD ($) PER WEEK
TV spot (1 minute) 5,000 800 12
Daily newspaper (full-
8,500 925 5
page ad)
Radio spot (30
2,400 290 25
seconds, prime time)
Radio spot (1 minute,
2,800 380 20
afternoon)

8-5
 WIN BIG GAMBLING CLUB
The problem formulation is
X1 = number of 1-minute TV spots each week
X2 = number of daily paper ads each week

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

X3 = number of 30-second radio spots each week
X4 = number of 1-minute radio spots each week
Objective:
Maximize audience coverage = 5,000X1 + 8,500X2 + 2,400X3 + 2,800X4
Subject to X1 12 (max TV spots/wk)
X2 5 (max newspaper ads/wk)
X3 25 (max 30-sec radio spots ads/wk)
X4 20 (max newspaper ads/wk)
800X1 + 925X2 + 290X3 + 380X4 $8,000 (weekly advertising budget)
X3 + X4 5 (min radio spots contracted)
290X3 + 380X4 $1,800 (max dollars spent on radio)
X1, X2, X3, X4 0 8-6
WIN BIG GAMBLING CLUB SOLUTION IN EXCEL
2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.1
8-7
MARKETING RESEARCH

Linear programming has also been applied

to marketing research problems and the

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

area of consumer research.
Statistical pollsters can use LP to help make
strategy decisions.

8-8
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES ASSOCIATION
Management Sciences Associates (MSA) is a
marketing research firm.
MSA determines that it must fulfill several

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

requirements in order to draw statistically valid
conclusions:
Survey at least 2,300 U.S. households.
Survey at least 1,000 households whose heads are 30
years of age or younger.
Survey at least 600 households whose heads are between
31 and 50 years of age.
Ensure that at least 15% of those surveyed live in a state
that borders on Mexico.
Ensure that no more than 20% of those surveyed who are
51 years of age or over live in a state that borders on 8-9
Mexico.
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES ASSOCIATION
MSA decides that all surveys should be conducted
in person.
It estimates the costs of reaching people in each age

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

and region category are as follows:

COST PER PERSON SURVEYED ($)

REGION AGE 30 AGE 31-50 AGE 51

State bordering Mexico $7.50 $6.80 $5.50

State not bordering Mexico $6.90 $7.25 $6.10

8-10
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES ASSOCIATION

MSAs goal is to meet the sampling requirements at

the least possible cost.
The decision variables are:

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

X1 = number of 30 or younger and in a border state
X2 = number of 31-50 and in a border state
X3 = number 51 or older and in a border state
X4 = number 30 or younger and not in a border state
X5 = number of 31-50 and not in a border state
X6 = number 51 or older and not in a border state

8-11
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES ASSOCIATION

Objective function
Minimize total

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

interview costs = $7.50X1 + $6.80X2 + $5.50X3
+ $6.90X4 + $7.25X5 + $6.10X6

subject to
X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 + X5 + X6 2,300 (total households)
X1 + X4 1,000 (households 30 or younger)
X2 + X5 600 (households 31-50)
X1 + X2 + X3 0.15(X1 + X2+ X3 + X4 + X5 + X6) (border states)
X3 0.20(X3 + X6) (limit on age group 51+ who can live in
border state)
X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6 0
8-12
MSA SOLUTION IN EXCEL 2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.2
8-13
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES ASSOCIATION
The following table summarizes the results of the
MSA analysis.
It will cost MSA $15,166 to conduct this research.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

REGION AGE 30 AGE 31-50 AGE 51

State bordering Mexico 0 600 140

State not bordering Mexico 1,000 0 560

8-14
MANUFACTURING APPLICATIONS
Production Mix
LP can be used to plan the optimal mix of

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

products to manufacture.
Company must meet a myriad of constraints,
ranging from financial concerns to sales
demand to material contracts to union labor
demands.
Its primary goal is to generate the largest
profit possible.

8-15
FIFTH AVENUE INDUSTRIES
Fifth Avenue Industries produces four varieties of
ties:
One is expensive all-silk

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

One is all-polyester
Two are polyester and cotton blends
The table on the below shows the cost and
availability of the three materials used in the
production process:

MATERIAL AVAILABLE PER

MATERIAL COST PER YARD ($) MONTH (YARDS)
Silk 24 1,200
Polyester 6 3,000
Cotton 9 1,600 8-16
FIFTH AVENUE INDUSTRIES
The firm has contracts with several major
department store chains to supply ties.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Contracts require a minimum number of ties but
may be increased if demand increases.
Fifth Avenues goal is to maximize monthly profit
given the following decision variables.

X1 = number of all-silk ties produced per month

X2 = number all-polyester ties
X3 = number of blend 1 polyester-cotton ties
X4 = number of blend 2 silk-cotton ties
8-17
FIFTH AVENUE INDUSTRIES DATA

MATERIAL

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

SELLING MONTHLY REQUIRED
VARIETY OF PRICE PER CONTRACT MONTHLY PER TIE MATERIAL
TIE TIE ($) MINIMUM DEMAND (YARDS) REQUIREMENTS
All silk 19.24 5,000 7,000 0.125 100% silk

All polyester 8.70 10,000 14,000 0.08 100% polyester

Poly cotton 50% polyester

9.52 13,000 16,000 0.10
blend 1 50% cotton

Silk-cotton 60% silk - 40%

10.64 5,000 8,500 0.11
blend 2 cotton

Table 8.1

8-18
FIFTH AVENUE INDUSTRIES
Fifth Avenue also has to calculate profit per tie for
the objective function.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

SELLING MATERIAL MATERIAL
PRICE REQUIRED PER COST PER COST PER PROFIT
VARIETY OF TIE PER TIE ($) TIE (YARDS) YARD ($) TIE ($) PER TIE ($)
All silk $19.24 0.125 $24 $3.00 $16.24
All polyester $8.70 0.08 $6 $0.48 $8.22
Poly-cotton
$9.52 0.05 $6 $0.30
blend 1
0.05 $9 $0.45 $8.77
Silk cotton
$10.64 0.06 $24 $1.44
blend 2
0.06 $9 $0.54 $8.66

8-19
FIFTH AVENUE INDUSTRIES
The complete Fifth Avenue Industries Model
Objective function

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Maximize profit = $16.24X1 + $8.22X2 + $8.77X3 + $8.66X4
Subject to 0.125X1+ 0.066X4 1200 (yds of silk)
0.08X2 + 0.05X3 3,000 (yds of polyester)
0.05X3 + 0.44X4 1,600 (yds of cotton)
X1 5,000 (contract min for silk)
X1 7,000 (contract min)
X2 10,000 (contract min for all polyester)
X2 14,000 (contract max)
X3 13,000 (contract mini for blend 1)
X3 16,000 (contract max)
X4 5,000 (contract mini for blend 2)
X4 8,500 (contract max) 8-20
X1, X2, X3, X4 0
 FIFTH AVENUE SOLUTION IN EXCEL 2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.3
8-21
MANUFACTURING APPLICATIONS
Production Scheduling
Setting a low-cost production schedule over a

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

period of weeks or months is a difficult and
important management task.
Important factors include labor capacity,
inventory and storage costs, space limitations,
product demand, and labor relations.
When more than one product is produced, the
scheduling process can be quite complex.
The problem resembles the product mix model
for each time period in the future.
8-22
GREENBERG MOTORS
Greenberg Motors, Inc. manufactures two different
electric motors for sale under contract to Drexel
Corp.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Drexel places orders three times a year for four
months at a time.
Demand varies month to month as shown below.
Greenberg wants to develop its production plan for
the next four months.

MODEL JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL

GM3A 800 700 1,000 1,100
GM3B 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,400
8-23
Table 8.2
GREENBERG MOTORS
Production planning at Greenberg must consider
four factors:
Desirability of producing the same number of motors each

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

month to simplify planning and scheduling.
Necessity to keep inventory carrying costs down.
Warehouse limitations.
Its no-lay-off policy.
LP is a useful tool for creating a minimum total
cost schedule the resolves conflicts between these
factors.

8-24
GREENBERG MOTORS

Ai = Number of model GM3A motors produced in month i

(i = 1, 2, 3, 4 for January April)

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Bi = Number of model GM3B motors produced in month i

It costs $20 to produce a GM3A and $15 to

produce a GM3B
Both costs increase by 10% on March 1, thus

Cost of production = $20A1 + $20A2 + $22A3 + $22A4

+ $15B1 + $15B2 + $16.50B3 + $16.50B4

8-25
 GREENBERG MOTORS
We can use the same approach to create the portion of the
objective function dealing with inventory carrying costs.
IAi= Units of GM3A left in inventory at the end of month i (i

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

= 1, 2, 3, 4 for January April)
IBi= Units of GM3B left in inventory at the end of month i (i
= 1, 2, 3, 4 for January April)

The carrying cost for GM3A motors is $0.36 per

unit per month and the GM3B costs $0.26 per unit
per month.
Monthly ending inventory levels are used for the
average inventory level.
Cost of carrying inventory = $0.36A1 + $0.36A2 + $0.36A3 + 0.36A4 8-26
+ $0.26B1 + $0.26B2 + $0.26B3 + $0.26B4
GREENBERG MOTORS
We combine these two for the objective function:
Minimize total cost = $20A1 + $20A2 + $22A3 + 22A4

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

+ $15B1 + $15B2 + $16.50B3 + $16.50B4
+ $0.36IA1 + $0.36IA2 + $0.36IA3 + 0.36IA4
+ $0.26IB1 + $0.26IB2 + $0.26IB3 + $0.26IB4

End of month inventory is calculated using this

relationship:

Inventory Current
Inventory at Sales to
at the end months
of last + production the end of = Drexel this
this month month
month
8-27
GREENBERG MOTORS
Greenberg is starting a new four-month production
cycle with a change in design specification that left

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

no old motors in stock on January 1.
Given January demand for both motors:

IA1 = 0 + A1 800
IB1 = 0 + B1 1,000
Rewritten as Januarys constraints:

A1 IA1 = 800
B1 IB1 = 1,000
8-28
GREENBERG MOTORS
Constraints for February, March, and April:
A2 + IA1 IA2 = 700 February GM3A demand

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

B2 + IB1 IB2 = 1,200 February GM3B demand
A3 + IA2 IA3 = 1,000 March GM3A demand
B3 + IB2 IB3 = 1,400 March GM3B demand
A4 + IA3 IA4 = 1,100 April GM3A demand
B4 + IB3 IB4 = 1,400 April GM3B demand

And constraints for Aprils ending inventory:

IA4 = 450
IB4 = 300 8-29
GREENBERG MOTORS
We also need constraints for warehouse space:
IA1 + IB1 3,300

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

IA2 + IB2 3,300
IA3 + IB3 3,300
IA4 + IB4 3,300
No worker is ever laid off so Greenberg has a
base employment level of 2,240 labor hours per
month.
By adding temporary workers, available labor
hours can be increased to 2,560 hours per month.
Each GM3A motor requires 1.3 labor hours and 8-30
each GM3B requires 0.9 hours.
GREENBERG MOTORS
Labor hour constraints:
1.3A1 + 0.9B1 2,240 (January min hrs/month)

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

1.3A1 + 0.9B1 2,560 (January max hrs/month)
1.3A2 + 0.9B2 2,240 (February labor min)
1.3A2 + 0.9B2 2,560 (February labor max)
1.3A3 + 0.9B3 2,240 (March labor min)
1.3A3 + 0.9B3 2,560 (March labor max)
1.3A4 + 0.9B4 2,240 (April labor min)
1.3A4 + 0.9B4 2,560 (April labor max)
All variables 0 Nonnegativity constraints
8-31
 GREENBERG MOTORS SOLUTION IN EXCEL
2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.4 8-32
 GREENBERG MOTORS
Solution to Greenberg Motors Problem
PRODUCTION SCHEDULE JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Units GM3A produced 1,277 223 1,758 792

Units GM3B produced 1,000 2,522 78 1,700

Inventory GM3A carried 477 0 758 450

Inventory GM3B carried 0 1,322 0 300

Labor hours required 2,560 2,560 2,355 2,560

Table 8.3
Total cost for this four month period is
$169,294.90.
Complete model has 16 variables and 22 8-33
constraints.
EMPLOYEE SCHEDULING APPLICATIONS
Labor Planning
These problems address staffing needs over a

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

particular time.
They are especially useful when there is some
flexibility in assigning workers that require
overlapping or interchangeable talents.

8-34
HONG KONG BANK OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRY
Hong Kong Bank of Commerce and Industry has
requirements for between 10 and 18 tellers

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

depending on the time of day.
Lunch time from noon to 2 pm is generally the
busiest.
The bank employs 12 full-time tellers but has
many part-time workers available.
Part-time workers must put in exactly four hours
per day, can start anytime between 9 am and 1
pm, and are inexpensive.
Full-time workers work from 9 am to 3 pm and
have 1 hour for lunch. 8-35
HONG KONG BANK OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRY
Labor requirements for Hong Kong Bank of
Commerce and Industry

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

TIME PERIOD NUMBER OF TELLERS REQUIRED
9 am 10 am 10
10 am 11 am 12
11 am Noon 14
Noon 1 pm 16
1 pm 2 pm 18
2 pm 3 pm 17
3 pm 4 pm 15
4 pm 5 pm 10
8-36
Table 8.4
HONG KONG BANK OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRY
Part-time hours are limited to a maximum of 50%
of the days total requirements.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Part-timers earn $8 per hour on average.
Full-timers earn $100 per day on average.
The bank wants a schedule that will minimize
total personnel costs.
It will release one or more of its part-time tellers if
it is profitable to do so.

8-37
HONG KONG BANK OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRY
Let
F = full-time tellers

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

P1 = part-timers starting at 9 am (leaving at 1 pm)
P2 = part-timers starting at 10 am (leaving at 2 pm)
P3 = part-timers starting at 11 am (leaving at 3 pm)
P4 = part-timers starting at noon (leaving at 4 pm)
P5 = part-timers starting at 1 pm (leaving at 5 pm)

8-38
HONG KONG BANK OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRY
Objective:
Minimize total daily
personnel cost = $100F + $32(P1 + P2 + P3 + P4 + P5)

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

subject to:
F + P1 10 (9 am 10 am needs)
F + P1 + P2 12 (10 am 11 am needs)
0.5F + P1 + P2 + P3 14 (11 am noon needs)
0.5F + P1 + P2 + P3 + P4 16 (noon 1 pm needs)
F + P2 + P3 + P4 + P5 18 (1 pm 2 pm needs)
F + P3 + P4 + P5 17 (2 pm 3 pm needs)
F + P4 + P5 15 (3 pm 4 pm needs)
F + P5 10 (4 pm 5 pm needs)
F 12 (12 full-time tellers)
4P1 + 4P2 + 4P3 + 4P4 + 4P5 0.50(112) (max 50% part-timers) 8-39

P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 0

HONG KONG BANK OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRY
There are several alternate optimal schedules
Hong Kong Bank can follow:

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

F = 10, P2 = 2, P3 = 7, P4 = 5, P1, P5 = 0
F = 10, P1 = 6, P2 = 1, P3 = 2, P4 = 5, P5 = 0
The cost of either of these two policies is $1,448
per day.

8-40
LABOR PLANNING SOLUTION IN EXCEL
2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.5 8-41
FINANCIAL APPLICATIONS

Portfolio Selection
Bank, investment funds, and insurance

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

companies often have to select specific
investments from a variety of alternatives.
The managers overall objective is generally to
maximize the potential return on the investment
given a set of legal, policy, or risk restraints.

8-42
INTERNATIONAL CITY TRUST
International City Trust (ICT) invests in short-
term trade credits, corporate bonds, gold stocks,
and construction loans.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

The board of directors has placed limits on how
much can be invested in each area:

INTEREST MAXIMUM INVESTMENT

INVESTMENT EARNED (%) ($ MILLIONS)
Trade credit 7 1.0
Corporate bonds 11 2.5
Gold stocks 19 1.5
Construction loans 15 1.8

8-43
INTERNATIONAL CITY TRUST

ICT has $5 million to invest and wants to

accomplish two things:

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Maximize the return on investment over the next six
months.
Satisfy the diversification requirements set by the board.
The board has also decided that at least 55% of the
funds must be invested in gold stocks and
construction loans and no less than 15% be
invested in trade credit.

8-44
INTERNATIONAL CITY TRUST
The variables in the model are:

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

X1 = dollars invested in trade credit
X2 = dollars invested in corporate bonds
X3 = dollars invested in gold stocks
X4 = dollars invested in construction loans

8-45
INTERNATIONAL CITY TRUST
Objective:
Maximize
dollars of

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

interest = 0.07X1 + 0.11X2 + 0.19X3 + 0.15X4
earned

subject to: X1 1,000,000

X2 2,500,000
X3 1,500,000
X4 1,800,000
X3 + X4 0.55(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4)
X1 0.15(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4)
X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 5,000,000
X1, X2, X3, X4 0 8-46
INTERNATIONAL CITY TRUST

The optimal solution to the ICT is to make the following

investments:

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

X1 = $750,000
X2 = $950,000
X3 = $1,500,000
X4 = $1,800,000
The total interest earned with this plan is $712,000.

8-47
ICT PORTFOLIO SOLUTION IN EXCEL 2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.6 8-48
TRUCK LOADING PROBLEM
Truck Loading Problem
The truck loading problem involves deciding
which items to load on a truck so as to maximize

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

the value of a load shipped.
Goodman Shipping has to ship the following six
items:
ITEM VALUE ($) WEIGHT (POUNDS)
1 22,500 7,500
2 24,000 7,500
3 8,000 3,000
4 9,500 3,500
5 11,500 4,000
8-49
6 9,750 3,500
GOODMAN SHIPPING
The objective is to maximize the value of items
loaded into the truck.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

The truck has a capacity of 10,000 pounds.

The decision variable is:

Xi = proportion of each item i loaded on the truck

8-50
GOODMAN SHIPPING
Objective:
Maximize $22,500X1 + $24,000X2 + $8,000X3

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

=
load value + $9,500X4 + $11,500X5 + $9,750X6
subject to
7,500X1 + 7,500X2 + 3,000X3
+ 3,500X4 + 4,000X5 + 3,500X6 10,000 lb capacity
X1 1
X2 1
X3 1
X4 1
X5 1
X6 1 8-51
X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6 0
GOODMAN TRUCK LOADING SOLUTION IN
EXCEL

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.7 8-52
GOODMAN SHIPPING
The Goodman Shipping problem raises an
interesting issue:
The solution calls for one third of Item 1 to be loaded on

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

the truck.
What if Item 1 cannot be divided into smaller pieces?
Rounding down leaves unused capacity on the
truck and results in a value of $24,000.
Rounding up is not possible since this would exceed
the capacity of the truck.
Using integer programming, in which the solution
is required to contain only integers, the solution is
to load one unit of Items 3, 4, and 6 for a value of
$27,250. 8-53
INGREDIENT BLENDING APPLICATIONS

Diet Problems
This is one of the earliest LP applications, and is

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

used to determine the most economical diet for
hospital patients.
This is also known as the feed mix problem.

8-54
WHOLE FOOD NUTRITION CENTER
The Whole Food Nutrition Center uses three bulk
grains to blend a natural cereal.

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

It advertises that the cereal meets the U.S.
Recommended Daily Allowance (USRDA) for four
key nutrients.
It wants to select the blend that will meet the
requirements at the minimum cost.
NUTRIENT USRDA
Protein 3 units
Riboflavin 2 units
Phosphorus 1 unit
Magnesium 0.425 unit
8-55
WHOLE FOOD NUTRITION CENTER
Let
XA = pounds of grain A in one 2-ounce serving of cereal

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

XB = pounds of grain B in one 2-ounce serving of cereal
XC = pounds of grain C in one 2-ounce serving of cereal

Whole Foods Natural Cereal requirements:

COST PER PROTEIN RIBOFLAVIN PHOSPHOROUS MAGNESIUM
GRAIN POUND (CENTS) (UNITS/LB) (UNITS/LB) (UNITS/LB) (UNITS/LB)
A 33 22 16 8 5
B 47 28 14 7 0
C 38 21 25 9 6 8-56
Table 8.5
WHOLE FOOD NUTRITION CENTER
The objective is:

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Minimize total cost of
mixing a 2-ounce serving = $0.33XA + $0.47XB + $0.38XC

subject to
22XA + 28XB + 21XC 3 (protein units)
16XA + 14XB + 25XC 2 (riboflavin units)
8XA + 7XB + 9XC 1 (phosphorous units)
5XA + 0XB + 6XC 0.425 (magnesium units)
XA + XB + XC = 0.125 (total mix)
XA, XB, XC 0
8-57
 WHOLE FOOD DIET SOLUTION IN
EXCEL 2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.8
8-58
INGREDIENT BLENDING APPLICATIONS
Ingredient Mix and Blending Problems
Diet and feed mix problems are special cases of a

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

more general class of problems known as
ingredient or blending problems.
Blending problems arise when decisions must be
made regarding the blending of two or more
resources to produce one or more product.
Resources may contain essential ingredients that
must be blended so that a specified percentage is
in the final mix.

8-59
LOW KNOCK OIL COMPANY
The Low Knock Oil Company produces two grades
of cut-rate gasoline for industrial distribution.
The two grades, regular and economy, are created

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

by blending two different types of crude oil.
The crude oil differs in cost and in its content of
crucial ingredients.

CRUDE OIL TYPE INGREDIENT A (%) INGREDIENT B (%) COST/BARREL ($)

X100 35 55 30.00
X220 60 25 34.80
8-60
LOW KNOCK OIL COMPANY
The firm lets
X1 = barrels of crude X100 blended to produce the

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

refined regular
X2 = barrels of crude X100 blended to produce the
refined economy
X3 = barrels of crude X220 blended to produce the
refined regular
X4 = barrels of crude X220 blended to produce the
refined economy

The objective function is

Minimize cost = $30X1 + $30X2 + $34.80X3 + $34.80X4
8-61
LOW KNOCK OIL COMPANY
Problem formulation
At least 45% of each barrel of regular must be ingredient A

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

(X1 + X3) = total amount of crude blended to produce
the refined regular gasoline demand
Thus,
0.45(X1 + X3) = amount of ingredient A required
But:
0.35X1 + 0.60X3 = amount of ingredient A in refined regular gas

So
0.35X1 + 0.60X3 0.45X1 + 0.45X3
or
0.10X1 + 0.15X3 0 (ingredient A in regular constraint) 8-62
LOW KNOCK OIL COMPANY
Problem formulation

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Minimize cost = 30X1 + 30X2 + 34.80X3 + 34.80X4
subject to X1 + X3 25,000
X2 + X4 32,000
0.10X1 + 0.15X3 0
0.05X2 0.25X4 0
X1, X2, X3, X4 0

8-63
LOW KNOCK OIL SOLUTION IN EXCEL
2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.9
8-64
TRANSPORTATION APPLICATIONS
Shipping Problem
The transportation or shipping problem

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

involves determining the amount of goods or
items to be transported from a number of
origins to a number of destinations.
The objective usually is to minimize total
shipping costs or distances.
This is a specific case of LP and a special
algorithm has been developed to solve it.

8-65
TOP SPEED BICYCLE COMPANY
The Top Speed Bicycle Co. manufactures and
markets a line of 10-speed bicycles.
The firm has final assembly plants in two cities

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

where labor costs are low.
It has three major warehouses near large markets.
The sales requirements for the next year are:
New York 10,000 bicycles
Chicago 8,000 bicycles
Los Angeles 15,000 bicycles
The factory capacities are:
New Orleans 20,000 bicycles
Omaha 15,000 bicycles 8-66
TOP SPEED BICYCLE COMPANY
The cost of shipping bicycles from the plants to the
warehouses is different for each plant and

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

warehouse:
TO
FROM NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES
New Orleans $2 $3 $5

Omaha $3 $1 $4

The company wants to develop a shipping schedule

that will minimize its total annual cost.

8-67
TOP SPEED BICYCLE COMPANY
Network Representation of the Transportation Problem with
Costs, Demands, and Supplies

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Figure 8.1 8-68
TOP SPEED BICYCLE COMPANY
The double subscript variables will represent the origin
factory and the destination warehouse:

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Xij = bicycles shipped from factory i to warehouse j
So:
X11 = number of bicycles shipped from New Orleans to New York
X12 = number of bicycles shipped from New Orleans to Chicago
X13 = number of bicycles shipped from New Orleans to Los Angeles
X21 = number of bicycles shipped from Omaha to New York
X22 = number of bicycles shipped from Omaha to Chicago
X23 = number of bicycles shipped from Omaha to Los Angeles

8-69
TOP SPEED BICYCLE COMPANY
Objective:
Minimize

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

total
shipping = 2X11 + 3X12 + 5X13 + 3X21 + 1X22 + 4X23
costs

subject to X11 + X21 = 10,000 (New York demand)

X12 + X22 = 8,000 (Chicago demand)
X13 + X23 = 15,000 (Los Angeles demand)
X11 + X12 + X13 20,000 (New Orleans factory supply)
X21 + X22 + X23 15,000 (Omaha factory supply)
All variables 0
8-70
TOP SPEED BICYCLE COMPANY SOLUTION
IN EXCEL 2010

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

Program 8.10

8-71
TOP SPEED BICYCLE COMPANY
Top Speed Bicycle solution:
TO

Copyright 2012 Pearson Education

FROM NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES
New Orleans 10,000 0 8,000
Omaha 0 8,000 7,000

Total shipping cost equals $96,000.

Transportation problems are a special case of LP as
the coefficients for every variable in the constraint
equations equal 1.

8-72