Four Theories On Disaster Management Studies

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Theories on disaster management: an overview

Presented to:
Dr. Mahbuba Nasreen
Professor
Institute of Disaster Management and Vulnerability Studies
University of Dhaka
“KAROTOA”
Presented by
¢Prokrity Islam (34)
¢Nazia Afroze (42)
¢ Atiqur Rahman Atiq(32)
¢Ashiq Iqbal (40)
¢Shohrab Shohag(30)
¢Sabbir Hossen Shuvo(36)
Theory

A theory is a set of interrelated prepositions that allow for the


systematization of knowledge, explanations, and prediction of
social life and the generation of new research
hypotheses.(Faia, 1986; ritzer,2000:4)
Disaster theory

Disaster Theory offers the theoretical background needed to understand what


disasters are and why they occur. Drawing on related disciplines, including sociology,
risk theory, and seminal research on disasters and emergency management, it lays
out the conceptual framework of the emerging field of disaster studies.

. “Disaster represents a disruption of the normal social and economic patterns of a


community”. (Dyer, 1999, p.294) Britton (1988) also shows that crisis is synonymous
with disaster, and that “a disaster, from a sociological standpoint, is probably the event
which, above all other social crisis events, causes maximum community disruption and
dislocation”. (Britton, 1988, p. 375-376) Stallings (1991) also explains that disasters
have functional and dysfunctional consequences
Major theories on disaster management
lEconomic Theory
lMarxist Interpretation on Disaster
lWeberian perspectives of emergency management
lSocial constructionist views
lOrganizational behavior
lEmergent behavior
lRisk perception and communication
lDevelopment
lSustainability
lTechnology
cont...
lDecision theory
lSystems theory
lChaos theory
lManagement theory
lPaper plan syndrome
lNetworking and collaboration
lCompliance model of evacuation
lPolicy making
lPreparedness and improvisation
lIntegration
Combined theories:

Organizational Attitudinal Management Economic Development


Perspective Perspective Perspective perspective perspective
Organizational perspective
• Lack of organizational collaboration and networking in pre-disaster, during and after
disaster is likely to produce more vulnerability.
• Instantly appeared organizations make untrained responders and volunteers which
may produce unwanted casualties during emergency operation.
• Integration among various organization can mitigate the vulnerability.

Each of these theories have reflected the behavior of organizations in disaster


management.
Attitudinal Perspective
Our Culture is like that it can rise vulnerability. In addition, our practices, attitudes, values
let us to the greater losses. It is common that we usually don’t pay heed to the disasters. It
is natural in our attitude that we downplay probable harmful consequences but exaggerate
our ability to deal with disaster and thus for this attitude our vulnerability don’t decrease.
Then after during impending disaster when we have to evacuate to safe place for reducing
our vulnerability, at that time we are not willing to do that due to some reasons mainly of
attitudes. But the emergency responders have to understand several factors to encourage us
to evacuate and finally to reduce the vulnerabilities. We know there can’t be any
vulnerability without hazard. Thus, our degree of vulnerability can be determined based on
our attitudes on a daily basis from the view point of social construction.
It includes:
Management Perspective
Cont.

Political perspective
Cont.
Others..
Economic perspective
Disaster is a sudden, calamitous event, bringing great damage, loss, destruction and devastation to life
and property as well as economy. Economic conditions and political powerlessness are related to
disaster vulnerability. Natural disasters affect the poorest countries more than others, the most
vulnerable and marginalized populations have to deal with the most serious consequences (FREITAS et
al., 2012; IFRC, 2003, 2010). Economist Gary Becker suggested that increased investment in education,
which raises GDP, as better-educated people and more prosperous nations have better capacity to
manage disasters.

• Remittances significantly mitigate the impacts of natural disasters in terms of the number of victims in
developing countries, accounting for between 8% and 17% of Gross National Product (GNP) (cf. EBEKE &
COMBES, 2013);

NO ONE IS IMMUNE... BUT SOME ARE MORE VULNERABLE THAN OTHERS.


Cont.
It includes two of the theories:

1. Economic theory

2. Marxist interpretation of disasters


Development Perspective

Contradictory to the term disaster—which has a negative connotation—


development often, but not always, has a positive and progressive implication. The
two terms—disaster and development—tend to divert society towards opposite
directions, these two concepts are undoubtedly related to each other. According
to Fordham (2007) “Many [scholars] (Collins 2009; Manyena 2012; Schilderman
1993; O’Brien et al. 2006) are now realizing that there is strong connection
between disaster and development”
Cont.
The Disaster Management Training Programme (1994), McEntire (2004) and Fordham
(2007) indicate four ways in which disaster and development support and conflict each
other:

(1) development increases vulnerability to disaster

(2) development reduces vulnerability to disaster

(3) disaster sets back development, and

(4) disaster provides development opportunities

Sustainable development reduces the susceptibility to vulnerability otherwise haphazard


development results in additional disaster. Development in technologies could lessen
impacts of natural disasters but over-reliance on it actually generating seeds of disaster.

You might also like