A e 8129 Hybrid Rocket 4

AE 8129 Rocket Propulsion
Introduction
Solid-Propellant Rocket Motors
Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines
 Hybrid Rocket Engines
Air-Breathing Rocket Engines
Non-Chemical Space Propulsion

Systems
Pressure-Fed Hybrid Rocket Engine
Diagram courtesy of Stanford University

Introduction to Hybrid Rocket Engines
(HREs)
• A compromise between the simplicity of SRMs
and the performance of LREs; some safety,
material availability and environmental advantages
• Engine is started, and burn and corresponding
thrust can be modulated (throttled) through to
completion, like an LRE
• Competitive for single- or multi-stop/start
applications requiring medium performance (i.e.,
potentially higher Isp than SRM)
• Thrust range: newtons (thruster) to mega-
newtons (launch vehicle first-stage engine)
*frozen LOX valve inhibited oxidizer delivery to engine, then subsequent hydrogen peroxide fire broke out
AMROC’s SET-1 launch vehicle on launch pad, 1989

(*aborted launch; SET = Single Engine Test; LOX/HTPB)
SpaceShipOne
First production HRE usage
Images courtesy of Scaled Composites LLC

HRE test firing (lots of aft flame in exhaust plume suggests
significant afterburning in reacting with outside air)
HRE test firing, showing Mach diamonds (comprised of
oblique shock and rarefaction waves) in exhaust plume
HRE test firing (NASA/Stanford University)
Nominal exhaust flow patterns for an overexpanded supersonic nozzle
(upper diagram) and an underexpanded supersonic nozzle (lower diagram),
revealing diamond-shaped wave patterns
HRE Design Considerations
• Wide choice of solid fuels to choose from,

where factors such as energy, regression
rate, structural robustness and availability
come into play, e.g., modest-energy plastics
like polyethylene are stiff, medium-energy
rubbers like HTPB are a bit soft, high-energy
waxes like paraffin are really soft
• Lower fuel regression rates may force the
use of multiple ports, to get the burning
surface area up in value
Single (central) port and
multiple port fuel grain designs,
depending on required burning
surface area needed
HRE Oxidizer Feed System
• Three main categories: 1) self-pressurized feed
2) pressure-feed, and 3) turbopump-feed
• Self-pressurization of some oxidizers like nitrous
oxide (control transition temperature from liquid
to gas) or hydrogen peroxide (catalyst used to
instigate transition from liquid to gas)
• Pressure-feed approach is the present common
choice for higher performance, using a high-
pressure gas like He or N2 to drive the oxidizer
from storage to the injector plate at around 20%
greater pressure than operating combustion
chamber pressure pc
Use of hydrogen peroxide as oxidizer
Injectors
• Injectors atomize the incoming liquid oxidizer
spray (break into small droplets) and encourage
spreading of oxidizer droplets/vapor over the
solid fuel internal port surface
• Ignition of solid fuel initiated by various means
(metal wool, igniter paste, secondary oxidizer
and/or liquid/gas fuel injection, electrically-
heated nichrome wire, spark plug, pyrotechnic
cartridge, etc.)
Pre- and Post-Combustion Chambers
• Commonly see the use of a pre-combustion chamber
between the head-end injector plate and the fuel grain,
to allow for better oxidizer atomization and spread
pattern
• Occasionally see the use of a post-combustion chamber
between the end of the fuel grain and the nozzle entry, to
allow for further reaction time, and to permit additional
oxidizer injection aft
Orbitec vortex design with head end and aft
oxidizer injection
Combustion Processes
• Equilibrium chemical reaction between
nitrous oxide and paraffin wax may be
approximated by the following:
85N2O(g) + C28H58(s)  85N2(g) +

29H2O(g) +
28CO2(g) + heat
Fuel Surface Regression
• Standard empirical model, based on axial

mass flux G = u :
rb  aG n
, 0.4 < n < 0.85
• For preliminary design, and for regression

rate data reduction, common to assume :
rb  aG n
O
Go = m O / A p
Fuel Regression (cont’d)
• Greatrix/Gottlieb convective heat feedback

model analogous to HRE mass-flux
dependent burning:
h( TF  TS )
rb   ro , general case
 s [ C s ( TS  Ti )  H s ]
h* Cp ( TF  TS ) h*
rb  n [ 1  ] n [  ] , typical case,
 sC p C s ( TS  Ti  H s / C s ) sC p ro small
1/ 3
k 2 / 3C p Gf *
h*  (note dependence on G)
 2/3
8
5
Theory (A)
Theory (C)
Theory (D)
Expt. (A)
Burning Rate, mm/s

4 Expt. (C)
Expt. (D)
0
0 100 200 300 400
Mass Flux, kg/m2-s
Theoretical and experimental data for burning rate as a

function of mass flux, HTPB/GOX propellant A, and paraffin/
GOX propellants C & D
Internal Ballistic Analysis
• Preliminary estimate of chamber pressure,

using empirical regression law:
m O n
 1  s Sa( )  m O
m  2  1 1 / 2 Ap
pc  c *   ( ) ] 
At RT f   1 At
• For thrust, etc. :

 1
p 
F  C F At pc  C F ,v [ 1  ( e ) ] 1 / 2 At pc  ( pe  p ) Ae
pc
F
I sp 
m g o
Internal Ballistics (cont’d)
Stoichiometric mixture ratio:

.
mo GO A p
rst  
.
mf
stoich
 s rb  dLst
Stoichiometric length (cylindrical grain, fixed oxidizer rate):
GO d GO1n d
Lst    f( d 2n-1 )
4 s rst rb 4a s rst
Gd 2 Pr 2 / 3 d
Lst   , alternate expression
4  s rst rb f * ( n[  ])( rst )
• Typical design issues with conventional
hybrid rocket engine:
LST < f , early in firing, some unreacted

fuel ablated from aft fuel surface, fuel
decomposition gas enters nozzle and
afterburns with outside air in exhaust
plume
LST > f , later in firing, some unreacted

oxidizer enters nozzle, may do
oxidization damage to nozzle surface
Non-Combustive Ablation
h* Cp (T  Tds )
es  n[1  ]
sC p C s {(Tds  Ti )  H s / C s }
, ablation rate of fuel, aft of stoichiometric length

3
sea level
paraffin/GOx 0.2
2
Pressure, MPa
Thrust, kN
0.1
1
0 0.0
0 50 0 50
Time, s Time, s
Predicted pressure- and thrust-time profile for small

cylindrical-grain fixed-oxidizer-rate HRE; first dip is
grain burnback beginning to meet outer wall limit;
second dip is transition point where LST begins to
exceed the fuel grain length
Combustion Instability in HREs
• Susceptible to both axial and transverse
symptoms in the combustor (pressure waves);
higher frequencies more damaging than lower
frequencies, at high wave amplitudes
• At low wave frequencies, one can observe
symptoms of significant amplitude associated
with feed system instability (related to injectors
and upstream plumbing)
• Cold outside air temperatures tend to cause
instability issues
HRE-powered prototype rocket vehicle (Purdue University)
Proposed HRE-powered launch vehicle (by Antares)

A e 8129 Hybrid Rocket 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A e 8129 Hybrid Rocket 4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A e 8129 Hybrid Rocket 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AE 8129 Rocket Propulsion

Solid-Propellant Rocket Motors

Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines

 Hybrid Rocket Engines

Air-Breathing Rocket Engines

Non-Chemical Space Propulsion

Diagram courtesy of Stanford University

AMROC’s SET-1 launch vehicle on launch pad, 1989

First production HRE usage

Images courtesy of Scaled Composites LLC

• Wide choice of solid fuels to choose from,

85N2O(g) + C28H58(s)  85N2(g) +

• Standard empirical model, based on axial

• For preliminary design, and for regression

• Greatrix/Gottlieb convective heat feedback

Burning Rate, mm/s

Theoretical and experimental data for burning rate as a

• Preliminary estimate of chamber pressure,

• For thrust, etc. :

Stoichiometric mixture ratio:

Stoichiometric length (cylindrical grain, fixed oxidizer rate):

LST < f , early in firing, some unreacted

LST > f , later in firing, some unreacted

, ablation rate of fuel, aft of stoichiometric length

Predicted pressure- and thrust-time profile for small

You might also like