NBA SAR Preparation
NBA SAR Preparation
NBA SAR Preparation
Dr. R. V. Ranganath
Professor,
Department of Civil Engineering,
BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore -19
1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute.
1.3. Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and
disseminated among stakeholders (PEOs).
• Availability on Institute website under relevant program link
• Availability at department notice boards
• HoD Chamber
• Department website, if available
• Availability in department level documents
• Documentary evidence
1.4. State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the
Department and PEOs of the program.
Process to ensure:
• Effective participation of Stakeholders
• Effective Process implementation
Steps
• Documentary evidence
Contd.
PEO Statements M1 M2 …… Mn
PEO 1
PEO 2
PEO 3
PEO 4
2.1.1. State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University
curriculum for attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
as mentioned in Annexure-I. Also mention the identified curricular gaps, if any
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the
attainment of POs & PSOs.
Details of the following for the attainment of POs & PSOs
• Additional course
• Learning material
• Content
• Laboratory experiments
• Projects etc.
3.1. Establish the correlation between the Courses and the Program
Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
3.1.1. Course Outcomes (COs)
SAR should include course outcomes of One course/Semester (3rd to 8th) of study,
however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence Example
COURSE COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
CO1 3 3 - - - - - 1 - - -
Design of RCC
Structures CO2 3 3 3 - - - - 2 - - -
10CV5DCRCC
CO3 3 3 3 - - - - 3 - - -
Contd.
3.1.3. Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year
courses
• It may be noted that contents of Table 3.1.2 must be consistent with
information available in Table 3.1.3 for all the courses.
Contd.
3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set
attainment levels
• Program shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for all courses
• The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in
the University Examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment
years
• Attainment level
Student performance in internal assessments with respect the Course
Outcomes
Performance in the University Examination
Contd.
For example:
Attainment through University Examination: Substantial i.e. 3
Attainment through Internal Assessment: Moderate i.e. 2
Assuming 80% weightage to University examination and 20% weightage to Internal
assessment, the attainment calculations will be (80% of University level)
+ (20% of Internal level ) i.e. 80% of 3 + 20% of 2 = 2.4 + 0.4 = 2.8
Program may decide five attainment levels instead of three For ex.-
Attainment levels:
• Level 5 – Very High - Score from >2.5 to 3
• Level 4 – High - Score from >2 to 2.5
• Level 3 – Medium - Score from >1.5 to 2
• Level 2 – Low - Score from >1 to 1.5
• Level 1 – Very Low- Score from 0.5 to <1
3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment
of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
• Describe the assessment tools and processes used to gather the data upon
which the evaluation of each of the Program Outcomes and Program
Specific Outcomes is based indicating the frequency with which these
processes are carried out
• Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the
Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes are attained and
document the attainment levels
Contd.
Item
(Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the period Marks
of assessment)
>= 90% students 20
>= 80% students 18
>= 70% students 16
>= 60% students 14
Otherwise 0
Contd.
Note: If 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will
be 40 as both 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be applicable simultaneously
Contd.
University
qualification
Designation
Department
Specialization
Ph.D. Guidance
Nature of Association
(Regular/Contract)
Contd.
5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR)
(To be calculated at Department Level)
No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): __________
No. of PG Programs in the Department (m): __________
No. of Students in UG 2nd Year= u1
No. of Students in UG 3rd Year= u2
No. of Students in UG 4th Year= u3
No. of Students in PG 1st Year= p1
No. of Students in PG 2nd Year= p2
No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + Actual admitted lateral entry students (The above
data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the department)
S=Number of Students in the Department = UG1 + UG2 +… +UGn + PG1 + …PGn
F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
Student Teacher Ratio (STR) = S / F
Year CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
u1.1
u1.2
u1.3
UG1 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3
…
un.1
un.2
un.3
p1.1
p1.2
PG1 p1.1+p1.2 p1.1+p1.2 p1.1+p1.2
…..
pm.1
pm.2
PGm pn.1+pn.2 pn.1+pn.2 pn.1+pn.2
Total No. of Students in the UG1 + UG2 +.. UG1 + UG2 + .. +UGn UG1 + UG2 + ..
Department (S) +UGn + PG1 + + PG1+… + PGn +UGn + PG1+…
…PGn + PGn
No. of Faculty in the F1 F2 F3
Department (F)
< = 15 - 20 Marks
< = 17 - 18
< = 19 -
16
< = 21 - 14
< = 23 - 12
< = 25 10
>25 - 0 marks
Minimum 75% should be Regular/ full time faculty and the remaining shall be
Contractual Faculty as per AICTE norms and standards.
The contractual faculty (doing away with the terminology of visiting/adjunct faculty,
whatsoever) who have taught for 2 consecutive semesters in the corresponding
academic year on full time basis shall be considered for the purpose of calculation in
the Student Faculty Ratio.
5.1.1. Provide the information about the regular and contractual faculty as per the
format mentioned below:
CAY
CAYm1
CAYm2
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25)
Sum
RF= Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty
ratio as per 5.1
Assessment = 3 × (Sum/0.5RF) (Marks limited to 15)
Average assessment over three years (Marks limited to 15) =
Contd.
7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs &
PSOs
• Identify the areas of weaknesses in the program based on the analysis of
evaluation of POs & PSOs attainment levels
• Measures identified and implemented to improve POs & PSOs attainment levels
for the assessment years
Sample 2:
• In a course on EM theory student performance has been consistently low with
respect to some COs
• Analysis of answer scripts and discussions with the students revealed that this could
be attributed to a weaker course on vector calculus
• Action taken-revision of the course syllabus was carried out (instructor/text book
changed too has been changed, when deemed appropriate)
Sample 3:
• In a course that had group projects it was determined that the expectations from this
course about PO3 (like: “to meet the specifications with consideration for the public
health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations”) were
not realized as there were no discussions about these aspects while planning and
execution of the project
• Action taken- Project planning, monitoring and evaluation included in rubrics
related to these aspects
Contd.
POs & PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement – CAY
7.2. Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of
Assessment
• Assessment shall be based on conduct and actions taken in relation to
Continuous Improvement
8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses
Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.
• The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the
University Examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years.
• Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student performance in internal
assessments with respect the COs of a subject plus the performance in the
University examination
Contd.
COURSE COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
C101
C102
...
...
Direct Attainment
Contd.
Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3
For CFY: Similar tables are to be prepared for CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3
Total No. of
Total Income Actual expenditure (till …)
students:
Other Recurring Special
Non Expenditure
Fee Govt. Grant(s) Sources including Projects/Any
recurring per student
(specify) Salaries other, specify
Contd.
Software
Laboratory
consumable
Maintenance and
spares
R&D
Training and
Travel
Miscellaneous
expenses *
10.4. Library and Internet
• AICTE zero deficiency report for all the assessment years
• Effective availability
• Purchase records
• Utilization of facilities
• Documentation
10.4.1. Quality of learning resources (hard/soft)
• Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources
• Accessibility to students
10.4.2. Internet
• Name of the Internet provider
• Available bandwidth
• Wi Fi availability
• Internet access in labs, classrooms, library and offices of all Departments
• Security arrangements