Superior Vena Cava Obstruction: Aditya Rachakonda, PGY4 December 8, 2014
The document discusses Superior Vena Cava Obstruction (SVCO), including its etiology, clinical findings, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options such as conservative therapy, endovascular treatment including stenting, and surgical treatment involving bypass procedures to restore venous drainage when more conservative options have failed. Malignant causes account for about 60% of SVCO cases but benign etiologies such as central venous catheters and pacemakers are increasingly common due to their widespread use.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
100 views35 pages
Superior Vena Cava Obstruction: Aditya Rachakonda, PGY4 December 8, 2014
The document discusses Superior Vena Cava Obstruction (SVCO), including its etiology, clinical findings, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options such as conservative therapy, endovascular treatment including stenting, and surgical treatment involving bypass procedures to restore venous drainage when more conservative options have failed. Malignant causes account for about 60% of SVCO cases but benign etiologies such as central venous catheters and pacemakers are increasingly common due to their widespread use.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 35
Superior Vena Cava Obstruction
Aditya Rachakonda, PGY4
December 8, 2014 Objectives • Overview • Anatomy • Etiology • Clinical Findings • Diagnostic Evaluation • Conservative Therapy • Endovascular Treatment • Surgical Treatment Overview • Symptoms of venous congestion of head/neck 2/t occlusion of the SVC or innominate vein develops in 15,000 pts/year • SVC syndrome caused by malignant tumors of lung and mediastinum in 60% of cases • Incidence of non-malignant cases 2/t intravenous devices is increasing • Treatment in pts w/ advanced malignant disease is palliative, but is curative in those w/ benign disease Anatomy • SVC is the primary venous drainage system from the head, neck, upper extremities, and upper thorax • Approx. 6 to 8 cm long • Extends from junction of the R and L innominate veins to the R atrium • Located in the middle mediastinum • Surrounded by relatively rigid structures – Trachea, R bronchus, sternum, aorta, paratracheal/perihilar lymph nodes • Low-pressure, thin-walled structure easily compressed by adjacent structures Etiology • First case of SVC obstruction was due to aortic aneurysm - described by William Hunter in 1757 • Incidence of SVCS 2/t tuberculosis, syphilitic mediastinitis, aortitis has decreased in the 20th century due to anti- microbial tx • Currently, MCC of SVCS is lung cancer w/ mediastinal lymphadenopatny and primary mediastinal malignancy – Non-small cell lung ca (50%) – Small-cell lung ca (22%) – Lymphoma (12%) – Metastatic ca (9%) – Thymoma (2%) – Plasmacytoma Etiology • Benign disease is the cause of SVCS in 40% of cases – Mediastinal fibrosis and granulomatous fungal disease (histoplasmosis) have historically been MCC of benign obstruction – Rapid increase in the use of indwelling venous catheters and cardiac pacemakers has resulted in a greater number of pts w/ benign etiology • 5 million central venous catheters and 500K pacemakers are implanted in the US annualy • Associated with upper extremity or central deep vein obstruction in 7 – 33% of cases – SVCS occurs in 1 – 3% of these cases Etiology • Other important causes for SVC obstruction: – Previous radiotherapy to the mediastinum – Retrosternal goiter – Aortic dissection • Risk of SVCS is increased in pts w/ thrombophilia: – Factor V Leiden – Antithrombin III deficiency – Protein C or S deficiency Causes of SCVS Clinical Findings • Signs and symptoms determined by duration and extent of occlusion and amount of collateral development • Feeling of fullness in head/neck that is exacerbated by bending over or lying flat – Severity of disease can be judged by # of pillows needed to sleep comfortably • Dyspnea • Orthopnea • Headache/dizziness • Syncope • Visual symptoms • Signs/symptoms of malignant SVCS: hemoptysis, hoarseness, dysphagia, weight loss, cervical lymphadenopathy Clinical Findings • Physical Exam: – Prominent chest wall collaterals – Dilated neck veins – Swelling of the face, neck, and eyelids – Ecchymosis and cyanosis of the face – Mild to moderate upper extremity swelling Signs/Symptoms Diagnostic Evaluation • Clinical diagnosis suggested by H & P, can be confirmed by diagnostic imaging – Plain film radiographs – mediastinal widening, R hilar mass, pleural effusion, upper lobe collapse • Normal CXR does not preclude dx of SVCS – Ultrasonography • Direct visualization of SVC not possible • Subclavian and IJ vein can be studied for indirect evidence of SVC obstruction – Respiratory variation in flow is lost – Increased diameter of deep veins – Visualization of numerous collateral vessels Diagnostic Evaluation • CTA – Can demonstrated location and extent of obstruction – Can distinguish benign and malignant causes – Can identify collateral pathways • Azygos-hemiazygos • Internal mammary/superior, inferior epigastric veins • Lateral thoracic venous system • Contrast-enhanced venography – Gold-standard – Used to provide “roadmap” prior to reconstructive procedures – Depicts presence and direction of venous collateral flow
*Note: during venography, only veins and collateral pathways between
injection site and RA are visualized – IJ, frequently used for inflow for surgical bypass, is not visualized 35 y/o M w/ histoplasmosis, 3yr h/o progressive facial and upper- extremity swelling CTA shows narrowed SVC w/ adjacent calcified lymph nodes Sonogram shows markedly dampened venous waveforms with a loss in respiratory variation Stanford and Doty Classification of SVCS • Based on extent of obstruction and direction of collateral flow – Type I: high-grade SVC stenosis but normal direction of flow through SVC and azygos vein; increased collateral circulation thru hemiazygos and accessory azygos pathway – Type II: greater than 90% stenosis or occlusion of the SVC but a patent azygos vein with normal direction of flow Stanford and Doty Classification of SVCS • Type III: complete occlusion of the SVC with retrograde flow through the azygos and hemiazygos veins • Type IV: extensive occlusion of the SVC, innominate, and azygos veins with chest wall and epigastric venous collaterals Conservative Therapy • Used first in every pt to relieve symptoms of venous congestion and to decrease progression of venous thrombosis – Elevation of head w/ pillows while sleeping – Modify daily activities to avoid bending or supine positions – Avoid constricting garments or tight collars – Diuretic agents to decrease excessive edema in head/neck – Acute SVCS 2/t malignant disease IV heparin or LMWH followed by warfarin to prevent recurrence, protect collateral circulation – Treat the underlying cause • Mediastinal malignancy irradiation, chemotherapy, or combinaton Endovascular Treatment • First line of treatment for SVCS – avoids median sternotomy needed for surgical reconstruction • Indicated in pts who do not respond to medical therapy • In contrast to chemoradiation tx for malignant SCVS, endovascular stenting establishes immediate luminal patency and provides rapid symptomatic relief – Has been used prior to chemorads in malignant SCVS with good success • In pts w/ SVC obstruction 2/t intraluminal thrombosis, thrombolytic therapy can be effective Endovascular Technique • Access is typically obtained via femoral vein, but brachial or IJ access is also used – If complete occlusion of SVC or brachiocephalic veins, additional b/l upper extremity access via brachial should be used to facilitate catheterization of the occlusion – Dual access enables antegrade and retrograde venography, facilitates canalization of the lesion Endovascular Technique • Femoral access w/ 9-Fr introducer sheath • 260cm Bentson guide wire, followed by a pigtail catheter placed into the SVC • Venography of the SVC and brachiocephalic veins is performed • Traverse the lesion using a hydrophilic GW, exchange for a stiff wire (Amplatz or Lunderquist) for balloon or stent delivery – If unable to cross SVC occlusion or high-grade lesion, can place a thrombolytic infusion catheter for bolus or continuous delivery for a certain period of time • Systemic heparinization followed by balloon-predilation • Angioplasty alone yields poor long term results 2/t high rates of restenosis stenting is the preferred treatment – Balloon-expanding stent – Self-expanding stent Pt w/ symptomatic SVC syndrome
A – High grade stenosis on
venogram B – Luminal patency re- established w/ the placement of a Palmaz stent C – CXR demonstrates location of the stent Thrombolytic Therapy • Can lead to complete clot resolution or can partially recannalize the thrombus to allow crossing the lesion • Thrombolytic therapy early after onset of symptoms leads to an improved response • Non-malignant SVCS responds more favorably to thrombolytic therapy because of subacute nature of lesion • Many physicians perform lytic therapy before stenting with good results – In cases of thrombotic occlusion, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy allows reduction of thrombolytic dose and increases the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy Stenting • Angioplasty alone: – Results in vessel recoil – May be acceptable for short segment disease, but most pts w/ SVCS have extensive disease requiring stenting • Most commonly used stents: – Z-stent (Cook) • Rigid, self-expanding; highest radial force in middle segment – Palmaz stent (Cordis) • Balloon-expandable stent w/ high radial force; precise deployment – SMART stent (Cordis) • Self-expanding, nitinol stent – Wallstent (Boston Scientific) • Most widely used • Self-expanding with longitudinal flexibility, ideal for long, tortuous lesions
• Covered stents used with limited success in the SVC
– Initially proposed to limit tumor ingrowth – Thought to have less predisposition to development on neointimal hyperplasia – Not routinely used because can cover important collaterals, resulting in worsening of symptoms especially when stent graft occludes Surgical Treatment • Indications: – Pts w/ benign disease who have extensive chronic venous thrombosis (type III or IV) – Pts w/ less extensive disease (type I or II) who have failed endovascular therapy • Pts w/ malignant tumors should undergo reconstruction via median sternotomy only if their life expectancy is greater than 1 year – Extra-anatomic subcutaneous bypass between jugular vein and femoral vein with composite saphenous vein or PTFE is an option if symptoms are severe and endovascular treatment has failed Graft Materials • Large diameter autologous vein is not available to use as a conduit • Greater Saphenous Vein Graft – Poor size match – Suitable for extra-anatomic reconstruction; both saphenous veins are harvested and sutured together – To prevent external compression, some authors have placed the composite GSV graft into an externally supported ePTFE graft Graft Materials • Femoral or femoropopliteal vein graft – Excellent suitability in terms of size and length – If pt has underlying thrombotic abnormalities, removal of deep leg vein can result in moderate edema/pain may progress to chronic venous insufficiency • Spiral Saphenous Vein Graft – First described in animal models; first used in pts by Doty – Autologous vein, low thrombogenicity – Length is limited by available saphenous vein, diameter can be adjusted as needed • Saphenous vein is removed, distended w/ papaverine soln, opened longitudinally • Valves are excised • Wrapped around a 32-36Fr chest tube • Edges of the vein are sutures together • Length of saphenous vein to be harvested to create graft is based on: – l = RL/r – Harvesting from groin to knee usually results in 10cm long SSVG Graft Materials • ePTFE Grafts – Most commonly used prosthetic for large vein reconstruction – Flow through innominate vein exceeds 1000mL/min short, large diameter (10-14mm) grafts have excellent long term patency • If peripheral anastomosis is performed w/ the subclavian vein, venous inflow is significantly less and an AVF in the arm may be needed to improve patency • For an IJ – atrial appendage bypass, a 12mm ePTFE graft is suitable (AVF to graft is not required) – Externally supported grafts are a good choice in pts w/ malignant disease • Recurrent tumor is more likely to compress and occlude vein grafts A – Venography demonstrates type III SVC occlusion w/ retrograde flow in the azygous vein B – Spiral saphenous vein graft (constructed using non-penetrating vascular clips) used for L IJ/R atrial appendage bypass C – Post-op venogram demonstrating a patent graft. Graft is patent is pt is asymptomatic at 3 years. Cumulative Secondary Patency of Vein and ePTFE Grafts for SVC reconstruction References 1) Cronenwett, Jack L., K. Wayne. Johnston, and Robert B. Rutherford. "Chapter 61 – Superior Vena Cava Obstruction: Surgical Treatment." Rutherford's Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2010. 2) Cronenwett, Jack L., K. Wayne. Johnston, and Robert B. Rutherford. "Chapter 62 – Superior Vena Cava Obstruction: Endovascular Treatment." Rutherford's Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2010. 3) Nickloes, Todd A. "Superior Vena Cava Syndrome." Superior Vena Cava Syndrome. Medscape Reference, May-June 2012. Oct 2012. <http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/460865-overview>.