0% found this document useful (0 votes)
100 views35 pages

Superior Vena Cava Obstruction: Aditya Rachakonda, PGY4 December 8, 2014

The document discusses Superior Vena Cava Obstruction (SVCO), including its etiology, clinical findings, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options such as conservative therapy, endovascular treatment including stenting, and surgical treatment involving bypass procedures to restore venous drainage when more conservative options have failed. Malignant causes account for about 60% of SVCO cases but benign etiologies such as central venous catheters and pacemakers are increasingly common due to their widespread use.

Uploaded by

jhk0428
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
100 views35 pages

Superior Vena Cava Obstruction: Aditya Rachakonda, PGY4 December 8, 2014

The document discusses Superior Vena Cava Obstruction (SVCO), including its etiology, clinical findings, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options such as conservative therapy, endovascular treatment including stenting, and surgical treatment involving bypass procedures to restore venous drainage when more conservative options have failed. Malignant causes account for about 60% of SVCO cases but benign etiologies such as central venous catheters and pacemakers are increasingly common due to their widespread use.

Uploaded by

jhk0428
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 35

Superior Vena Cava Obstruction

Aditya Rachakonda, PGY4


December 8, 2014
Objectives
• Overview
• Anatomy
• Etiology
• Clinical Findings
• Diagnostic Evaluation
• Conservative Therapy
• Endovascular Treatment
• Surgical Treatment
Overview
• Symptoms of venous congestion of head/neck 2/t
occlusion of the SVC or innominate vein develops
in 15,000 pts/year
• SVC syndrome caused by malignant tumors of
lung and mediastinum in 60% of cases
• Incidence of non-malignant cases 2/t intravenous
devices is increasing
• Treatment in pts w/ advanced malignant disease
is palliative, but is curative in those w/ benign
disease
Anatomy
• SVC is the primary venous drainage system from the
head, neck, upper extremities, and upper thorax
• Approx. 6 to 8 cm long
• Extends from junction of the R and L innominate veins
to the R atrium
• Located in the middle mediastinum
• Surrounded by relatively rigid structures
– Trachea, R bronchus, sternum, aorta,
paratracheal/perihilar lymph nodes
• Low-pressure, thin-walled structure  easily
compressed by adjacent structures
Etiology
• First case of SVC obstruction was due to aortic aneurysm -
described by William Hunter in 1757
• Incidence of SVCS 2/t tuberculosis, syphilitic mediastinitis,
aortitis has decreased in the 20th century due to anti-
microbial tx
• Currently, MCC of SVCS is lung cancer w/ mediastinal
lymphadenopatny and primary mediastinal malignancy
– Non-small cell lung ca (50%)
– Small-cell lung ca (22%)
– Lymphoma (12%)
– Metastatic ca (9%)
– Thymoma (2%)
– Plasmacytoma
Etiology
• Benign disease is the cause of SVCS in 40% of
cases
– Mediastinal fibrosis and granulomatous fungal disease
(histoplasmosis) have historically been MCC of benign
obstruction
– Rapid increase in the use of indwelling venous
catheters and cardiac pacemakers has resulted in a
greater number of pts w/ benign etiology
•  5 million central venous catheters and 500K pacemakers
are implanted in the US annualy
• Associated with upper extremity or central deep vein
obstruction in 7 – 33% of cases
– SVCS occurs in 1 – 3% of these cases
Etiology
• Other important causes for SVC obstruction:
– Previous radiotherapy to the mediastinum
– Retrosternal goiter
– Aortic dissection
• Risk of SVCS is increased in pts w/
thrombophilia:
– Factor V Leiden
– Antithrombin III deficiency
– Protein C or S deficiency
Causes of SCVS
Clinical Findings
• Signs and symptoms determined by duration and extent of
occlusion and amount of collateral development
• Feeling of fullness in head/neck that is exacerbated by bending over
or lying flat
– Severity of disease can be judged by # of pillows needed to sleep
comfortably
• Dyspnea
• Orthopnea
• Headache/dizziness
• Syncope
• Visual symptoms
• Signs/symptoms of malignant SVCS: hemoptysis, hoarseness,
dysphagia, weight loss, cervical lymphadenopathy
Clinical Findings
• Physical Exam:
– Prominent chest wall collaterals
– Dilated neck veins
– Swelling of the face, neck, and eyelids
– Ecchymosis and cyanosis of the face
– Mild to moderate upper extremity swelling
Signs/Symptoms
Diagnostic Evaluation
• Clinical diagnosis suggested by H & P, can be
confirmed by diagnostic imaging
– Plain film radiographs – mediastinal widening, R hilar
mass, pleural effusion, upper lobe collapse
• Normal CXR does not preclude dx of SVCS
– Ultrasonography
• Direct visualization of SVC not possible
• Subclavian and IJ vein can be studied for indirect evidence of
SVC obstruction
– Respiratory variation in flow is lost
– Increased diameter of deep veins
– Visualization of numerous collateral vessels
Diagnostic Evaluation
• CTA
– Can demonstrated location and extent of obstruction
– Can distinguish benign and malignant causes
– Can identify collateral pathways
• Azygos-hemiazygos
• Internal mammary/superior, inferior epigastric veins
• Lateral thoracic venous system
• Contrast-enhanced venography
– Gold-standard
– Used to provide “roadmap” prior to reconstructive procedures
– Depicts presence and direction of venous collateral flow

*Note: during venography, only veins and collateral pathways between


injection site and RA are visualized – IJ, frequently used for inflow for
surgical bypass, is not visualized
35 y/o M w/ histoplasmosis, 3yr h/o progressive facial and upper-
extremity swelling
CTA shows narrowed SVC w/ adjacent calcified lymph nodes
Sonogram shows markedly dampened venous waveforms with a loss in
respiratory variation
Stanford and Doty Classification of SVCS
• Based on extent of obstruction and direction of collateral flow
– Type I: high-grade SVC stenosis but normal direction of flow through
SVC and azygos vein; increased collateral circulation thru hemiazygos
and accessory azygos pathway
– Type II: greater than 90% stenosis or occlusion of the SVC but a patent
azygos vein with normal direction of flow
Stanford and Doty Classification of SVCS
• Type III: complete occlusion of the SVC with retrograde flow
through the azygos and hemiazygos veins
• Type IV: extensive occlusion of the SVC, innominate, and azygos
veins with chest wall and epigastric venous collaterals
Conservative Therapy
• Used first in every pt to relieve symptoms of venous
congestion and to decrease progression of venous
thrombosis
– Elevation of head w/ pillows while sleeping
– Modify daily activities to avoid bending or supine positions
– Avoid constricting garments or tight collars
– Diuretic agents to decrease excessive edema in head/neck
– Acute SVCS 2/t malignant disease  IV heparin or LMWH
followed by warfarin to prevent recurrence, protect
collateral circulation
– Treat the underlying cause
• Mediastinal malignancy  irradiation, chemotherapy, or
combinaton
Endovascular Treatment
• First line of treatment for SVCS – avoids median
sternotomy needed for surgical reconstruction
• Indicated in pts who do not respond to medical therapy
• In contrast to chemoradiation tx for malignant SCVS,
endovascular stenting establishes immediate luminal
patency and provides rapid symptomatic relief
– Has been used prior to chemorads in malignant SCVS with
good success
• In pts w/ SVC obstruction 2/t intraluminal thrombosis,
thrombolytic therapy can be effective
Endovascular Technique
• Access is typically obtained via femoral vein,
but brachial or IJ access is also used
– If complete occlusion of SVC or brachiocephalic
veins, additional b/l upper extremity access via
brachial should be used to facilitate
catheterization of the occlusion
– Dual access enables antegrade and retrograde
venography, facilitates canalization of the lesion
Endovascular Technique
• Femoral access w/ 9-Fr introducer sheath
• 260cm Bentson guide wire, followed by a pigtail catheter placed
into the SVC
• Venography of the SVC and brachiocephalic veins is performed
• Traverse the lesion using a hydrophilic GW, exchange for a stiff wire
(Amplatz or Lunderquist) for balloon or stent delivery
– If unable to cross SVC occlusion or high-grade lesion, can place a
thrombolytic infusion catheter for bolus or continuous delivery for a
certain period of time
• Systemic heparinization followed by balloon-predilation
• Angioplasty alone yields poor long term results 2/t high rates of
restenosis  stenting is the preferred treatment
– Balloon-expanding stent
– Self-expanding stent
Pt w/ symptomatic SVC
syndrome

A – High grade stenosis on


venogram
B – Luminal patency re-
established w/ the
placement of a Palmaz
stent
C – CXR demonstrates
location of the stent
Thrombolytic Therapy
• Can lead to complete clot resolution or can partially
recannalize the thrombus to allow crossing the lesion
• Thrombolytic therapy early after onset of symptoms
leads to an improved response
• Non-malignant SVCS responds more favorably to
thrombolytic therapy because of subacute nature of
lesion
• Many physicians perform lytic therapy before stenting
with good results
– In cases of thrombotic occlusion, pharmacomechanical
thrombectomy allows reduction of thrombolytic dose and
increases the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy
Stenting
• Angioplasty alone:
– Results in vessel recoil
– May be acceptable for short segment disease, but most pts w/ SVCS have extensive disease
requiring stenting
• Most commonly used stents:
– Z-stent (Cook)
• Rigid, self-expanding; highest radial force in middle segment
– Palmaz stent (Cordis)
• Balloon-expandable stent w/ high radial force; precise deployment
– SMART stent (Cordis)
• Self-expanding, nitinol stent
– Wallstent (Boston Scientific)
• Most widely used
• Self-expanding with longitudinal flexibility, ideal for long, tortuous lesions

• Covered stents used with limited success in the SVC


– Initially proposed to limit tumor ingrowth
– Thought to have less predisposition to development on neointimal hyperplasia
– Not routinely used because can cover important collaterals, resulting in worsening of
symptoms especially when stent graft occludes
Surgical Treatment
• Indications:
– Pts w/ benign disease who have extensive chronic
venous thrombosis (type III or IV)
– Pts w/ less extensive disease (type I or II) who have
failed endovascular therapy
• Pts w/ malignant tumors should undergo
reconstruction via median sternotomy only if
their life expectancy is greater than 1 year
– Extra-anatomic subcutaneous bypass between jugular
vein and femoral vein with composite saphenous vein
or PTFE is an option if symptoms are severe and
endovascular treatment has failed
Graft Materials
• Large diameter autologous vein is not
available to use as a conduit
• Greater Saphenous Vein Graft
– Poor size match
– Suitable for extra-anatomic reconstruction; both
saphenous veins are harvested and sutured
together
– To prevent external compression, some authors
have placed the composite GSV graft into an
externally supported ePTFE graft
Graft Materials
• Femoral or femoropopliteal vein graft
– Excellent suitability in terms of size and length
– If pt has underlying thrombotic abnormalities,
removal of deep leg vein can result in moderate
edema/pain  may progress to chronic venous
insufficiency
• Spiral Saphenous Vein Graft
– First described in animal models; first used in pts by
Doty
– Autologous vein, low thrombogenicity
– Length is limited by available saphenous vein,
diameter can be adjusted as needed
• Saphenous vein is removed,
distended w/ papaverine soln,
opened longitudinally
• Valves are excised
• Wrapped around a 32-36Fr chest
tube
• Edges of the vein are sutures
together
• Length of saphenous vein to be
harvested to create graft is based
on:
– l = RL/r
– Harvesting from groin to knee
usually results in 10cm long
SSVG
Graft Materials
• ePTFE Grafts
– Most commonly used prosthetic for large vein
reconstruction
– Flow through innominate vein exceeds 1000mL/min 
short, large diameter (10-14mm) grafts have excellent long
term patency
• If peripheral anastomosis is performed w/ the subclavian vein,
venous inflow is significantly less and an AVF in the arm may be
needed to improve patency
• For an IJ – atrial appendage bypass, a 12mm ePTFE graft is suitable
(AVF to graft is not required)
– Externally supported grafts are a good choice in pts w/
malignant disease
• Recurrent tumor is more likely to compress and occlude vein grafts
A – Venography demonstrates type III SVC occlusion w/ retrograde flow in the azygous
vein
B – Spiral saphenous vein graft (constructed using non-penetrating vascular clips) used
for L IJ/R atrial appendage bypass
C – Post-op venogram demonstrating a patent graft. Graft is patent is pt is asymptomatic
at 3 years.
Cumulative Secondary Patency of Vein
and ePTFE Grafts for SVC
reconstruction
References
1) Cronenwett, Jack L., K. Wayne. Johnston, and Robert B.
Rutherford. "Chapter 61 – Superior Vena Cava Obstruction:
Surgical Treatment." Rutherford's Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia,
PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2010.
2) Cronenwett, Jack L., K. Wayne. Johnston, and Robert B. Rutherford.
"Chapter 62 – Superior Vena Cava Obstruction: Endovascular
Treatment." Rutherford's Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, PA:
Saunders/Elsevier, 2010.
3) Nickloes, Todd A. "Superior Vena Cava Syndrome." Superior Vena Cava
Syndrome. Medscape Reference, May-June 2012. Oct 2012.
<http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/460865-overview>.

You might also like