The document discusses Immediate Constituent (IC) analysis, a method of grammatical analysis introduced by Leonard Bloomfield. IC analysis segments sentences into hierarchical binary constructions of immediate constituents, which can further be divided into ultimate constituents like morphemes. The analysis proceeds by binary division until constituents can no longer be divided. IC analysis reveals patterns in word formation and syntax, showing morphemic structure and how words combine into phrases. However, it has limitations for structurally ambiguous sentences with different meanings. Constituency tests like substitution and movement can help determine syntactic structure.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
963 views16 pages
IC Analysis
The document discusses Immediate Constituent (IC) analysis, a method of grammatical analysis introduced by Leonard Bloomfield. IC analysis segments sentences into hierarchical binary constructions of immediate constituents, which can further be divided into ultimate constituents like morphemes. The analysis proceeds by binary division until constituents can no longer be divided. IC analysis reveals patterns in word formation and syntax, showing morphemic structure and how words combine into phrases. However, it has limitations for structurally ambiguous sentences with different meanings. Constituency tests like substitution and movement can help determine syntactic structure.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 16
IC Analysis
Submitted by: Noor Fatima
Submitted to:Mam Wajiha Roll No:1809 Subject: GS Class: BS 6th semester Methods of grammatical analysis Immediate Constituent Analysis (IC analysis) was introduced by Leonard Bloomfield (1933) Combinations of units are usually structured into hierarchical sets of binary constructions e.g.: a black dress in severe style : a black dress in severe style The fundamental aim of immediate constituents analysis is to segment a set of lexical units into two maximally independent sequences - immediate constituents . The further segmentation of immediate constituents results in ultimate constituents: “a” ,”black” ,“dress” , “ in” , “severe” , “style” . This method is based on the binary principle, i.e. each stage of the procedure involves two components the unite immediately breaks into. The analysis is completed when we arrive at constituents incapable of further division, i.e. morphemes Definitions An immediate constituent - is a word or a group of words that functions as a single unit within a hierarchical structure. The ultimate constituents - are the smallest meaningful units which any given construction can be broken down to, consisting of, a morpheme at the morphological level and a word at the syntactic level. The linguistics procedure which divides sentences into their component parts or constituents in this way is known as constituent analysis. The segmentation of the sentence up into its immediate constituents by using binary cuttings units its ultimate constituents are obtained is an important approach to the realization of the nature of language called Immediate Constituent Analysis (IC Analysis). The main requirement is : the analysis must reveal patterns observed in other words of the same language
This analysis on the word-formation level
shows: The morphemic constituents of the word the structural pattern on which it is built. Phrase A phrase - is a combination of 2 or more notional words connected by means of subordination: cold weather Prof. Barkhudarov: a phrase - is a combination of 2 or more notional words, connected by means of subordination, coordination and predicative relation if it cannot function as a sentence: mother and father IC analysis Sentences are not just linear sequences of elements, but are made up of ‘layers’ of immediate constituents, each lower level constituent being part of a higher level constituent.
IC analysis is relevant for any level.
Syntax
Σ Poor John ran away VP
VP – V + Adv NP – Adj + N ran away Poor John Poor John ran away
Σ {NP (Adj + N) + VP (V + Adv)}
the "IС-derivation tree" {The + [small + lady]} + {[listened + (to + me)] + attentively}. Tree structures express a fundamental insight of syntactic analysis. That insight is that sentences do not simply consist of strings of lexical categories. Rather, within any sentence, words are grouped together to form phrases, which then combine with each other to form still larger phrases and so on. Immediate constituent analysis has its limitations. It is not possible to analyze such structures, for example, some sentences that are structurally similar but semantically they are different. 1. {Robert + [is easy + to flatter]}. 2. {Robert + [is eager + to flatter]}. When the same string of words can be associated with more than one tree structure, it is said to be structurally ambiguous. “I bring new pens and pencil” I + (bring + {new + [pens and pencil]}) I + (bring + {[new pens] + [and pencil]} Constituency tests Substitution I don't know the man who is sleeping in the car. I don't know him who is sleeping in the car. (ungrammatical) I don't know him. Movement He is going to attend another language course to improve his English. To improve his English, he is going to attend another course The question test What did you do yesterday? - Worked on my new project. vs. What did you do yesterday? - Worked on