ВВЕДЕНИЕ В ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННОЕ ПОВЕДЕНИЕ - ГЕНКИН - ENGL
ВВЕДЕНИЕ В ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННОЕ ПОВЕДЕНИЕ - ГЕНКИН - ENGL
ВВЕДЕНИЕ В ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННОЕ ПОВЕДЕНИЕ - ГЕНКИН - ENGL
BEHAVIOR.
INTRODUCTION
EVGENIY VICTOROVICH GENKIN
Evgeniy Victorovich Genkin
Contacts:
[email protected]
www.facebook.com/evgeny.genkin
MAIN RULES
ALLOWED NOT ALLOWED
- feel comfortable - response the phone calls,
- response the phone calls out of the SMS etc. inside the class
class - sleep during the lectures
- work and discuss in the class and workshops :)
- ask questions
- enter and to exit any time without
warning for any reason
- be late
- respect each other (one speaks etc.)
GETTING AN ASSESSMENT
Report (project team work) 1…10 points
Missing your line with report without 5 days notice -10 points!
Giving the Case solution in the class 1…5 points
Business game up to 5 points
Scientific paper (once per course) 1…15 points.
6. Organizational culture
BOOKS
3 DEFINITIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL
BEHAVIOR (1)
Organizational behavior is
defined as actions and
attitudes of individuals and
groups toward one another
and toward the organization,
and their effect on the
organization's functioning
and performance.
3 DEFINITIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL
BEHAVIOR (2)
Organizational behavior
is the study of human
behavior, attitudes and
performance in
organizations.
3 DEFINITIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL
BEHAVIOR (3)
Organizations are social inventions
for accomplishing common goals
through group effort. Organizational
behavior is concerned with the
attitudes and behaviors of
individuals and groups in
organizations and can be understood
in terms of three levels of analysis:
the individual, the group, and the
organization.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN SHORT
VIDEO
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
ORGANIZATION
+
BEHAVIOR
IS THIS THE WORLD WE CREATED? ©
THE WORLD OF
ORGANIZATIONS
THE ORGANIZATION IS
A GROUP OF PEOPLE REGULARY WORK
TOGETHER TO ACHIEVE COMMON GOALS
WHY ORGANIZATIONS ARE CREATED?
Organisations exist because groups of people working together can
achieve more than the sum of the achievements which the individuals in
the organisation could produce when working separately. For example,
one person might struggle all day to carry a piano upstairs, whereas a
team of four people, each taking one corner, may need to put in much less
than a quarter of the effort of one person to complete the task (Coates et
al., 1996, p. 19). Although such cooperation is beneficial, if individuals
pull in different directions, the result is counter-productive. Thus
coordination is necessary and this is a fundamental role of management,
as will be discussed in a later section of this session.
CHALLENGES THOSE ARE
FACED BY ORGANIZATIONS
TODAY THAT HAVE MADE IT
NECESSARY FOR MANAGERS
TO STUDY OB
Challenges facing organizations
1. Improving quality and productivity
More and more managers are confronted with the challenge of having to
improve their organizations productivity and the quality of their products and
services.
In improving quality and productivity, they are implementing programs like
TQM and Business Process Reengineering (BPR)
2. Improving people skills/interpersonal skills
OB gives the manager the opportunity to completely understand the behavior,
how to change the behavior and generally improve interpersonal skills
OB helps both practicing managers as well as potential managers to develop
skills that can be used in their job
Challenges facing organizations (cont…)
3. Managing workforce diversity
Workforce diversity has important implication for management –
managers will need to shift their philosophy form treating everyone
alike to recognizing differences and responding to them in ways that
will ensure employee retention and greater productivity.
4. Responding to Globalization
The world today is continuous becoming “global village”.
Organizations no longer constraint themselves to national boarders.
OB provides us with fundamental concepts to enable us focus on how
cultural differences might require managers to modify their managerial
practices
Challenges facing organizations (cont…)
5. Empowering people
Managers are empowering employees.
1. Practical application
2. Personal growth
3. Increased knowledge
1. Practical application of OB (1)
There are important practical benefits from understanding the
principles of organizational behavior:
Mental revolution
Taylor held that the technique of determining work standards, delimiting
wasteful operations and differential piece rate system of wage payment
should benefit the worker in form of higher wage payment and the
employer in form of higher production and this would result to a “mental
revolution” between ,management and workers
They would develop a cooperative rather than antagonistic attitude
towards each other
Criticism of Tailors Study
Saw man as an economic being - man is only
motivated by money
Saw that man can be programmed as a machine –
in the development of standards of performance
The Hawthorne Studies (1924 – 1945)
The Hawthorne Experiments
The experiments were carried out between 1927 and 1933 at
the Chicago Hawthorne plant of the Western Electric Company.
Four studies were carried out namely:
The illumination studies
The Relay Assembly Test Room Studies
The interviewing Program
The Bank Wiring Room studies
The illumination studies
These studies were expected to determine the
relationship between the level of illumination and
worker’s productivity.
It was expected that worker’s productivity would
increase with increasing levels of illumination.
The studies failed to prove any relationship between
worker’s productivity and level of illumination
Relay assembly test room studies
These studies were carried out to determine the relationship between worker’s
productivity and improved benefits and working conditions.
Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output:
Pay Incentives
Length of Work Day & Work Week
Use of Rest Periods
Company Sponsored Meals
The studies found out that there was no cause – and – effect relationship
between working conditions and output.
Rather, there were other factors that affected worker’s output such as
his/her attitudes and supervisor behavior
Conclusions on Hawthorne experiments
An industrial organization is a socio technical system. The socio part
is the human aspects that need to be taken care of in order to increase
workers’ productivity and the technical system is the physical aspects
that also need to be improved.
Employee attitudes and morale are also important as determinants of
productivity.
Other factors include worker’s personality and supervisor’s behavior,
leadership style also affect worker’s altitude and morale.
A worker’s social group has a prevailing effect on his or her altitude
and productivity
Contribution
therefore if you ask what is the best way for a manager to behavior –
autocratically or democratically, the contingent researcher will consider issues
like subordinates expectations and preferences and the situations at hand,
cultural differences, etc
CULTURE –QUALITY MOVEMENT (1980 –
PRESENT)
TQM is a corporate culture characterized by increased customer satisfaction
through continuous improvements, in which all employees actively participate
Two terms that gained quick interest among managers and organizational
researcher’s wee organizational culture and quality improvement.
The authors of several books in the early 1980s – Peter Waterman ( In Search
of Excellence), Deal and Kennedy ( Corporate Culture) and others focus on
how to build a strong set of shared positive values and norms within a
corporation (that is a strong corporate culture) while emphasizing quality
service, high performance and flexibility.
Organizational excellence, core values and core competencies
If CV are ignored in the quality strategy the company will not be able to utilize the CC,
which they try to build into the people.
Various managerial efforts seem to have small effect if these values are lacking
between employees and between management and employees.
Research shows that trust is a prerequisite for communication and dialogue, building
people relationships, building competencies and capabilities and for building a co-
operative culture.
Research also shows that procedural fairness and procedural
justice in the decision making process are associated with
increased motivation and commitment toward the decisions
made among employees.
Research show furthermore that even though the employees
•Initiative
component Description Competencies
Social awareness •Sensing what others are feeling Empathy
SHAREHOLDERS
TOP MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
THE OBJECT-SUBJECT MODEL OF DECISIONS
9
Information
Intelligenc
Decision
e
10 INFORMATION - BASIC RESOURCE OF MANAGER
Information - it is not matter or
energy, information – is information.
Norbert Wiener
eleven
Lack of Information
Information overload
Garbled information
Information asymmetry
LACK OF INFORMATION
12
...
What else can be built in 10 years?
Information overload
18
Counting capacity
verbal flexibility
verbal perception
dimensional orientation
Creative thinking
Creativity
cognitive control
Ear for music
Two-factor theory of intelligence
26
Intellect
Flexible Stable
TYPES OF INTELLIGENCE
27
“…many employers would like to see employees plowed
28
IN THEORY IN PRACTICE
…
Decision Making (Modern model)
thirty
Clarification Producing
Identifying of the purpose
the
the and Choosing Testing
formulation of Alternative
problem s
the problem
MATRIX OF PRIORITIES
31
«The PLACES WHERE DECISIONS LIVE»
32
Best practics
analysis of the context
Continuous choosing of the variations
Workaround
Insight
combinatorial thinking
Inversion
GROUPS
Effect of the presence of others
Norman Triplet (in 1897) studied the effect of competition on the
change in speed of a cyclist and compared the results with the results
obtained in a single race. Triplet found that cyclists show the best
time when competing with each other, and not with a stopwatch, and
concluded that the presence of others encourages people to more
energetic actions.
The effect of the presence of others can both enhance and
reduce a person’s motivation.
For example, the presence of others reduces the effectiveness of
human activity when memorizing meaningless syllables, when going
through a labyrinth, and when solving complex examples of
multiplication. In this case, the person’s attention can switch from
solving problems to the reactions of other people, to comparing
themselves with them.
Effect of “group membership”
English psychologists G. Tezhfel and J. Turner (1970s) studied how a
person is aware of their belonging to a group. They found that if a
person identifies himself with a group, he seeks to evaluate it
positively. Thus, he raises the status of the group and his own self-
esteem.
The cognitive component is that a person realizes his or her belonging
to a group and achieves this by comparing his group with other groups.
A person emotionally experiences his belonging to a group in the form
of various feelings - love or hate, pride or shame. The emotional
component is linked with the cognitive component.
The behavioral component shows itself when a person begins to
respond to other people from the standpoint of their group membership,
and not from the standpoint of an individual. Differences between his
group and other groups become noticeable and significant for him.
Witness phenomenon
B. Latayne (1979) described the
phenomenon of a non-interfering
witness.
After conducting a series of
experiments, he proved that the
number of witnesses of the tragic
accident itself prevents the possibility
of assistance from any of them. The
victim of an accident is less likely to
wait for help if a large number of
people are watching her suffering.
Synergy effect
A group with a
successful interaction in
the work may exceed
the amount of success
of individuals.
“Groupthinking”
The effect of "groupthinking" occurs when the
criterion of truth is a solid opinion of the group,
which is opposed to the opinion of the individual.
When members of a group face the threat of
disagreements, disputes and conflicts, they try to
reduce them and thereby eliminate the negative
feelings that have arisen.
They try to find a solution that suits everyone, even
if it is not objective and reasonable from the point of
view of each individual member of the group.
“Halo effect”
Lack of time. A person does not have time to thoroughly meet another person and
carefully consider his personal qualities or the situation.
Reloaded information. A person is so overloaded with information about various
people that he does not have the opportunity and time to think in detail about each
individual.
Insignificance of another person. Accordingly, there is a vague, indefinite idea of a
friend, his “halo”.
Stereotype perception. It arises on the basis of a generalized view of a large group
of people to which a given person belongs in one way or another.
Originality of personality. One kind of personality trait strikes those around and
pushes all its other qualities into the background. Physical attractiveness is often
just such a feature.
When is Collective decision-making advisable?
34