Novel Clay/silica Nanocomposite in WB Drilling Fluids

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Novel Clay/silica

Nanocomposite in WB drilling
fluids
INTRODUCTION

• With the recent development in nanoparticle technology, number of studies have


evaluated the possibility of using nanoparticles (NPs) in petroleum industry.
• Nanoparticles have high surface area to volume ratio giving improved surface
dependent material properties.
• Some studies revealed that the clay and silica nanoparticles can be used to improve
rheological properties.
• Furthermore, recent studies showed that NPs can decrease the fluid permeation into
shale formations and therefore act as a shale inhibitor additive in water base drilling
fluid.
• The pore throat size shale formations varies between 10 and 30 nm, while the smallest
drilling fluid additives such as barite and bentonite are typically in the size range of
100 to 10,000 nm, and cannot seal the shale pore throats.
DLS Analysis of NPs

• Two types of nanoparticles


as additives for WBs were
reported: Clay/SiO2 and
SiO2 nanoparticles.
Particle size distribution
from DLS data agreed with
TEM data showing
samples with particles
having diameters between
1 and >10 nm with the
most frequent population
having diameters between Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of nanoparticles
1-5 and 5-20 nm. of (a) CS (b) SiO2
Formulation
of Drilling
Fluids

Using polymer in drilling mud will improve the distribution of NPs through
the drilling mud composition.
Rheology of nano-WBs

The total percentage enhancement in yield point and plastic viscosities at 25°C after addition of the CS and NPs are 40% and
70%, respectively, while that after addition of the SiO2 NPs are 22% and 41%. Also, the total percentage enhancement in
yield point and plastic viscosities at 90 °C after addition of CS NPs are 65% and 82%, respectively, while that after addition of
the SiO2 NPs are 38% and 53% respectively. In general, the yield point difference between basic fluids and fluids with NPs is
considerably higher. This indicated that the addition of nano CS in the WB has helped to improve the rheological stability
against the temperature
Filtration of nano-
WBs

In Fig.(b and c) we can notice that there is significantly more invasion of NPs between porous micro
channels due to impermeable thin nano filter cake, compared to left image (a). Discuss the difference
between CS and SiO2, e.g., the smaller particle size of CS led to more effective plugging.
Filtrate volume results for fluid-loss samples for CS-WBs (S2-S5) and SiO2–WBs (S6-S9) at a) 25 ºC and b) 90 ºC compared with
base WB (S1).
REFERENCE
• Cheraghian, G., Wu, Q., Mostofi, M., Li, M. C., Afrand, M., &
Sangwai, J. S. (2018). Effect of a novel clay/silica
nanocomposite on water-based drilling fluids: Improvements in
rheological and filtration properties. Colloids and Surfaces A:
Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 555, 339-350.

You might also like