Chaprer III PFS Preparation
Chaprer III PFS Preparation
Chaprer III PFS Preparation
FEASIBILITY STUDY
BY
CLODUALDO V. VELASCO
Professor of Agribusiness, CLSU
INSTRUCTIONAL
OBJECTIVES
At the end of Chapter III, you
should be able to:
distinguish Project
Feasibility Study from a
Project Proposal; and
Although both PFS and project proposal are almost the same in its broader
sense (both are considered plans anyway!), they, however, differ in terms
of presentation and contents. PFS, for sure, is a more detailed action plan
than a project proposal.
While project proposal may run up to 10 or 15 pages, PFS on the other hand
may even reach 50-100 pages or even more because of its detailedness.
While PFS is most of the time subject to the test of feasibility, project
proposals may or may not be.
Take note that there are also instances wherein project proposals are made
to make a feasibility study of a proposed project. This doesn’t mean,
therefore, that a project proposal is always a feasibility study!
USES AND PURPOSES OF PFS
From the point of view of the PFS is used as a basis for
project proponent or investors determining whether a proposed
investment is feasible or not
PFS is used to prioritize investment
alternatives
PFS is used to encourage
stakeholders or investors to share
their capital with the project.
From the point of view of the PFS is used for prioritizing resource
Government commitments
PFS is used for assessing the
societal desirability of the project
PFS is used for determining the
financial assistance and/or support
services from the government (e.g.
subsidies, physical facilities,
investment incentives, etc.)
General Components of
PFS
Marketing Aspect;
Technical/Production
Aspect;
Organization and
Management Aspect;
Socio-Economic Aspect
PROJECT FEASIBILITY OUTLINE
FORMAT “A”
i. COVERLEAF
ii. TABLE OF CONTENTS
iii. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Rationale
1.2 Background and Purpose of the Project
Sample Executive Summary
Geared towards the government’s thrust of promoting agribusiness enterprise development and rural
industrialization, the study was focused in determining the feasibility of establishing the proposed Village-Based
Tomato Processing Centers in Aliaga, Talavera, and Rizal, Nueva Ecija, respectively. Two options were
evaluated in the conduct of the study, namely: Option I (Semi-mechanized operation) and Option II (Mechanized
operation). Although both options showed signs of project feasibility, Option II was given emphasis in the
preparation of the project study. This was preferred for it has provided greater opportunities and socio-economic
benefits among the intended beneficiaries. A brief project profile of Option II is presented as follows:
Excerpt of the Project Feasibility Study prepared by Prof. Clodualdo V. Velasco, Village-based Tomato Processing Project, 1992
Name of the Project Nueva Ecija Tomato Processing
Cooperative, Inc. (NETPCI)
Building 776,640
Transportation facilities 490,000
Production equipment 6,080,000
Pre-operating expenses 20,000
Working capital 3,789,203
Contingency (5%) 639,690
------------------
T O T A L P 12,793,812
The project was also subjected to sensitivity analysis. The yield on IRR shows
that the project is still viable when project costs will increase by 5% (16.15% IRR).
Likewise, a 5% shortfall in anticipated benefits will still provide the project an acceptable
IRR of 18.49%. Further investigation, however, has revealed that the project performance
is no longer viable at an increase of 10% on project costs. Findings showed that the
project is too cost sensitive, thus, it necessitates for effective cost control techniques
during the operationalization stage.
Market analysis indicates that there is a bright prospect in tomato processing. This
was reflected by the continuing importation of tomato pastes and the inadequacy of
supply coming from the local paste manufacturers. The project is anticipated to capture at
least 10% of the estimated 10,000 ton paste deficit locally. As percentage of projected
paste imports, market share of each plant is estimated at 7.57%.
The operational feasibility of the project is also positive. Through the DOST’s
CTTC Program, the project will be supported by the interplay of different agencies. The
project was also highly supported by the concerned/surveyed PMPCs.
IQFTF Individual Quick Frozen Tilapia Fillet 1000 215 Sample Price List
2000 150
Smoke Section
Bottled
Cold House 3
Water
Storage # 1 Station
Smoked Section Smoke
House 2
Packaging Section
Cold Storage
Smoke Room
Cold House 1
Storage # 2 Meat
Receiving
Section
Chiller
ICE PLANT
Room#2
Blast Freezing
Thawing
Grinding& Casing
Smoking
Cooling
Canning Packaging
Retorting Packing
Distribution
Sample Process Flow Chart
Process Flow Chart for Tilapia Fillet
Receiving
Smoking Sorting/Grading
weighting
Bleeding Depuration
Rubbing Trimming
Storing Packaging
(cold storage)
Sample Production Flow Chart
Continuation of PFS Format…
4.0 ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
4.1 Management During the Pre-operating Period
4.2 Management During the Pre-operating Period
4.2.1 Type and Size of Organization
4.2.2 Organizational Set-up
4.2.3 Job Description and Job Specification
4.2.4 Personnel Compensation and Fringe
Benefits
4.3 Timetable of Activities
Sample Organizational Chart
(Ostrich Farm)
General Manager
Farm Manager
Veterinary Consultant
Secretary
Head Caretaker
Clerk-Encoder
Laborer Laborer
Sample Job Description
JOB DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNICIAN
Particulars Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year-end Total
Gross Sales ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
Equals: Gross Margin ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
Less: Operating Expenses ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
A. Selling and Administative Expenses ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
B. Interest Expense ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
C. Depreciation ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
D.Amortization of Pre-operating Expenses
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
Total Operating Expenses ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
Equals: Net Income Before Tax ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
Less: Tax ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
Equals: Net Income After Tax ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________ ____________
Sample Projected Annual Income
Statement
Projected Annual Income Statement
Particulars January February March April May June July August September October November December Yer-end Total
Fixed Assets:
Land and Land improvements _________ _____________________________________________
Buildings and Equipment (net) _________ _____________________________________________
Vehicles (Net) _________ _____________________________________________
Office Furnitures and Fixtures (net) _________ _____________________________________________
Other Fixed Assets _________ _____________________________________________
Total Fixed Assts _________ _____________________________________________
Total Assets _________ _____________________________________________
Ye ar GB GC NB
0 ____________________________________
1 ____________________________________
2 ____________________________________
3 ____________________________________
4 ____________________________________
5 ____________________________________
Total _____________
_____________
_____________
1. Marketing Aspect
D. Competitors -do-
4. Financial Aspects
C. Financing Scheme
Equity Refer to project proponent or investors