Module 9 - Strategy Monitoring
Module 9 - Strategy Monitoring
Module 9 - Strategy Monitoring
MONITORING
STRATEGY MONITORING
It is essential that strategists systematically
review, evaluate, and control the execution of
strategies.
Present a framework that can guide
managers’ efforts to evaluate strategic-
management activities, to make sure they are
working, and to make timely changes.
Firms must continually evaluate its strategies
strategy:
Consistency, Consonance, Feasibility, Advantage
Consonance and advantage are mostly based on a
firm’s external assessment.
Consistency and feasibility are largely based on an
internal assessment.
EVALUATING STRATEGY
EVALUATING STRATEGY
REVIEWING BASES OF STRATEGY
Reviewing the underlying bases of an organization’s strategy could be approached
by developing a revised EFE (External Factor Evaluation) Matrix and IFE (Internal
Factor Evaluation) Matrix.
A revised IFE Matrix should focus on changes in the organization’s management,
profitability?
7. How far can our major competitors be pushed before retaliating?
8. How could we more effectively cooperate with our competitors?
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) matrix method is a
strategy-formulation tool that can be utilized to
evaluate how a company is performing in regards to
identified internal strengths and weaknesses of a
company.
External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrix method is a strategic-
management tool often used for assessment of current business
conditions. The EFE matrix is a good tool to visualize and
prioritize the opportunities and threats that a business is facing.
MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
Includes comparing expected results to actual results, investigating
deviations from plans, evaluating individual performance, and examining
progress being made toward meeting stated objectives. (long-term and
annual objectives)
Criteria for evaluating strategies should be measurable and easily verifiable.
Criteria that predict results may be more important than those that reveal
what already has happened.
Example- rather than simply being informed that sales in the last quarter
were 20 percent under what was expected, strategists need to know that
sales in the next quarter may be 20 percent below standard unless some
action is taken to counter the trend.
Failure to make satisfactory progress toward accomplishing long-term or
annual objectives signals a need for corrective actions.
Unreasonable policies, unexpected turns in the economy, unreliable suppliers
or distributors, or ineffective strategies, can result in unsatisfactory progress
toward meeting objectives.
Problems can result from ineffectiveness (not doing the right things) or
inefficiency (poorly doing the right things).
MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
Determining which objectives are most important in the
evaluation of strategies can be difficult.
Based on both quantitative and qualitative criteria.
Selecting the exact set of criteria for evaluating strategies
depends on a particular organization’s size, industry,
strategies, and management philosophy.
Example –A firm pursuing a retrenchment strategy could have a
different set of evaluative criteria from one firm pursuing a
market development strategy.
Quantitative criteria commonly used to evaluate strategies are
financial ratios.
Strategists use financial ratios to make critical comparisons:
1. Compare the firm’s performance over different time periods.
2. Compare the firm’s performance to competitors.
3. Compare the firm’s performance to industry averages.
TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Requires making changes to competitively reposition a firm for the
future.
Examples:
Altering an organization’s structure, replacing some key individuals