Sdmis Sec - Smea 2018
Sdmis Sec - Smea 2018
Sdmis Sec - Smea 2018
35
30 29
25
20
15
15
10
10
0
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Failed SY 2017-2018 by Year Level
18
16
14
12
10
17
8
9
4
2
2
1
0 0 0
Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
16 Failed SY 2017-2018 by Gender
14
12
10
8
14
6
4 8
2
3
2
1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
Male Female
Priority Sections of Failed
12
10
6
10
4
7 7
2
2 2
1
0
Grade 8 Grade 8 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 10 Grade 11
(Xenon) (Neon) (Radon) (Argon) (Helium) ( Celsius)
Reasons for Failing
Poor Academic
8
Performance
IDP(Transfer of
2
Residence)
Child Labor 5
Peer Influence 6
Lack of Interest 8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
PROBLEM
Problem Tree
TREE Problem:
Increased number
of failed students
Distance IDP’s
of School Supports returned Learning
No membership
Irregular in any school
the family
from to
2014-2015 Difficulty Attendance organization
Home Marawi
Social
Lack of
No proper
Lack of Poverty Self
Media guidance from
parent Confidenc parents/guardians
Addiction
Support e
Sin
Big Family Size Struggling
Readers
2014-2015
Adjustment
and
Agreement
ACCESS
Priority reasons for failing
2. CHILD LABOR
3. TRANSFER OF RESIDENCE
4. PEER INFLUENCE
80 80
3 DO
60 2 DO & 2F 60
110
99 96
40 1 DO & 1F 40
2014-2015 71
64 61
51 47
20 38 0 DO & 0F 20 36
27 27
0 0
Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade
7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12
Learners Ratings Below 75 Across Learning Area, SY 2017-2018
25
20
15
10
2014-2015
12
5 9 9
5 6
4
2 2
0
Math Science English Filipino ArPan EsP Mapeh TLE
2014-2015
Adjustment
and
Agreement
Problem
PROBLEM TreeTREE
2014-2015
Students’ Limited Ancillary
services-too Quality of No performance
behavior resources-
insufficient IMs much reports
Habitual
Absenteeism assessment tasks among
Trainings/Sem. tool students
QUALITY
1. STUDENTS BEHAVIOR
Recommendation:
2014-2015
GOVERNANCE
BUDGET CY 2017
5,000
153,000
2014-2015
344,000