Chapter 2 Env 100updated (Autosaved)
Chapter 2 Env 100updated (Autosaved)
Chapter 2 Env 100updated (Autosaved)
Environmental Ethics
2.2 Environmental Ethics
2
2.2 Environmental Ethics
In the most general sense, environmental ethics
invites us to consider three key propositions:
(2) The Earth and its creatures have intrinsic value, meaning
that they have moral value merely because they exist, not
only because they meet human needs.
(3) Based on the concept of an ecosystem, human beings
should consider “wholes” that include other forms of life and
the environment.
3
Environmental Ethics
Ethics
Right vs wrong
Morals
Feelings
Cultural relativism
Not everyone shares the same ethical commitments.
6
Three Philosophical Approaches to
Environmental Ethics
Anthropocentrism
Biocentrism
Ecocentrism
7
Three Philosophical Approaches to
Environmental Ethics
Anthropocentrism
(human-centered)
Humans are the center of
the universe.
Instrumental value of
things to humans?
Three Philosophical Approaches to
Environmental Ethics
Biocentrism
(life-centered)
All life forms have an inherent right to
exist.
Three Philosophical Approaches to
Environmental Ethics
Ecocentrism
Natureas the center of
the universe
Three Philosophical Approaches to
Environmental Ethics
“A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity,
stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong
when it tends otherwise….We abuse land because we
regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see
land as a community to which we belong, we may begin
to use it with love and respect.”
—Aldo Leopold
A Sand County Almanac, 1949
The Gaia Hypothesis
12
Other Philosophical Approaches
Other areas of philosophical thought address
environmental issues:
Ecofeminism
Social ecology
Deep ecology
Environmental pragmatism
Environmental aesthetics
Animal rights/welfare
2.3 Environmental Attitudes
Because ethical commitments pull in different directions
at different times, it is often easier to talk in terms of
environmental attitudes or approaches.
The three most common attitudes/approaches are:
Development approach
Preservation approach
Conservation approach
14
Development
This approach is the most anthropocentric.
It assumes the human race is, and should be, master of nature.
It assumes that the Earth and its resources exist solely for our
benefit and pleasure.
This approach is reinforced by the capitalist work ethic.
This approach thinks highly of human creativity and holds that
continual economic growth is a moral ideal for society.
15
Preservation
This approach is the most ecocentric.
It holds that nature has intrinsic value apart from human uses.
Preservationists such as John Muir, Ralph Waldo Emerson,
Henry David Thoreau, and Walt Whitman all viewed nature as
a refuge from economic activity, not as a resource for it.
Some preservationists wish to keep large parts of nature intact
for aesthetic or recreational reasons (anthropocentric
principles).
16
Conservation
This approach finds a balance between unrestrained
development and preservationism.
Conservationism promotes human well-being but
considers a wider range of long-term human goods in its
decisions about environmental management.
Many of the ideas in conservationism have been incorporated
into an approach known as sustainable development.
17
Environmental Attitudes
20
2.4 Environmental Justice
21
2.4 Environmental Justice
Environmental justice encompasses a wide range of
issues, including:
Where to place hazardous and polluting facilities
Transportation
Safe housing, lead poisoning, and water quality
Access to recreation
Exposure to noise pollution
Access to environmental information
Hazardous waste cleanup
Exposure to natural disasters (e.g., Hurricane Katrina)
22
Environmental Justice
The direct action in Warren County, NC, marked the birth of the
environmental justice movement in the U.S.
Erin Brockovich
Contamination of drinking water with hexavalent chromium, also known as
chromium(VI), in the southern California town of Hinkley.
Between 1952 and 1966, PG&E used hexavalent chromium to fight corrosion
in the cooling tower. The wastewater dissolved the hexavalent chromium
from the cooling towers and was discharged to unlined ponds at the site.
Some of the wastewater percolated into the groundwater, affecting an area
near the plant approximately two miles long and nearly a mile wide. [6]
The case was settled in 1996 for US$333 million, the largest
settlement ever paid in a direct action lawsuit in US history.
A study released in 2010 by the California Cancer Registry
showed that cancer rates in Hinkley "remained
unremarkable from 1988 to 2008."[7]
Environmental Justice
Environmental justice encompasses a wide range of issues,
including:
Where to place hazardous and polluting facilities
Transportation
Safe housing, lead poisoning, and water quality
Access to recreation
Exposure to noise pollution
Access to environmental information
Hazardous waste cleanup
Exposure to natural disasters
2. 6 Corporate Environmental Ethics
26
Waste and Pollution
27
2.6 Corporate Environmental Ethics
28
Is There a Corporate Environmental
Ethic?
Actions such as dumping waste in a river rather than
installing a wastewater treatment facility or using
expensive filters externalize the costs of doing business
so that the public, rather than the corporation, pays those
costs.
Greenwashing is a form of corporate misinformation where a
company will present a green public image and publicize green
initiatives that are false and misleading.
29
Profitability and Power
Profit margin determines expansion.
The more demand exists for a company’s products
financial resources
power
The greater a company’s power, the more influence it
has over decision makers who can create conditions
favorable to the company’s expansion plans.
Is There a Corporate Environmental Ethic?
Corporations face real choices between using
environmentally friendly or harmful production processes,
and are facing more pressure to adopt more
environmentally and socially responsible practices.
ISO 14000
CERES Principles
GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines
31
Corporate Environmental Ethic
Corporate
Environmental Harmful
Friendly
35
Green Business Concepts
36
Green Business Concepts
The triple bottom line has been referred to as the ethical
criteria for business success.
It includes social, environmental, and financial concerns.
People
Profit
Planet
37
2.8 The Ethics of Consumption
Food
Fertilizers, pesticides, and high-yield crops have more than
doubled world food production in the past 40 years.
Food distribution, not food production, is the cause of hunger.
Energy
At current rates of consumption, known oil reserves will not last through the current
century.
Foresighted energy companies are looking ahead by investing in the technologies that
will replace fossil fuels.
Nuclear power, solar, wind, wave, and biomass technologies are meeting increasing
proportions of national energy needs in other countries.
38
2.8 The Ethics of Consumption
Water
Currently humans use about half the planet’s accessible supply of
renewable, fresh water.
More than any other resource, water may limit consumerism in the
next century.
Wild Nature
Every day in the U.S., between 1000 and 2000 hectares of
farmland and natural areas are permanently lost to development.
39
2.9 Personal Choices
Individuals can make many lifestyle changes that
significantly reduce their personal impact on the planet.
Eating food produced locally, that is low on the food chain, and is grown with a
minimum of chemical fertilizers and pesticides reduces the environmental impact
of food production.
Buying durable consumer products and reusing or repairing products with usable
life reduces the raw materials that must be extracted from the ground.
40
Personal Choices
"The Ecological Footprint is a measure of the 'load'
imposed by a given population on nature. It represents the
land area necessary to sustain current levels of resource
consumption and waste discharge by that population.“
Total EF of a country is a function of population
size X resource use
Ecological footprint
Lifestyle and Environmental Impact
Personal Choices
(Homework)
Without decreasing my
standard of living drastically,
what could I change
(realistically) to reduce my
footprint?
Calculating my ecological footprint
(Homework)
http://www.footprintcalculator.org/