Rizlas Exile Trial and Death
Rizlas Exile Trial and Death
Rizlas Exile Trial and Death
attacked San Juan on August 30, but suffered heavy losses and
12. A letter of Marcelo Del Pilar to Don Juan A Tenluz (Juan Zulueta), dated
Madrid, June l, 1893 recommending to establishment of a special
organization, independent of Masonry, to help the cause of the Filipino
people.
13. Transcript of a speech of Pingkian (Emilio Jacinto), in a reunion of the
Katipunan on July 23, 1893, in which the following cry was uttered "Long
Live the Philippines! Long Live Liberty! Long Live Doctor Rizal! Unity!"
14. Transcript of a speech of Tik-Tik (Jose Turiano Santiago) in the same
Katipunan reunion, where in the katipuneros shouted: "Long live the eminent
Doctor Rizal! Death to the oppressor nation!''
15. A poem by Laong Laan (Rizal), entitled A Talisay, in which the author
makes the Dapitan schoolboys sing that they know how to fight for their
rights.
" Witnesses against Jose Rizal: Testimonies that
shaped his Trial"
Several individuals, including Martin Constantino, Aguedo de Rosario, Jose Reyes, Moises Salvador, Jose Dizon,
Domingo Franco, Deodato Arellano, Ambrosio Salvador, Pedro Serrano Laktaw, Dr. Pio Valenzuela, Antonio
Salazar, Francisco Quison, and Timoteo Paez, provided oral testimonies as evidence against Jose.
"Witnesses against Jose Rizal: Testimonies that
shaped his Trial"
On November 26, 1896, Judge Advocate, Colonel Francisco Olive forwarded the records of the case
to Governor General Ramon Blanco, who designated Captain Rafael Dominguez as special Judge
Advocate to initiate proceeding against Jose. Captain Dominguez submitted a summary of the action
to Governor General Ramon Blanco who thereupon, send it to the Judge Advocate General, Don
Nicolas De la Pena.
After studying the papers, Pena submitted the following recommendations: (1) the accused be
immediately brought to trial; (2) he should be kept in prison; (3) an order of attachment be issued
against his property to the amount of one million pesos as indemnity; and (4) he should be defended
in the court by an army officer, not by a civilian lawyer (Zaide and Zaide, 2014).
"Witnesses against Jose Rizal: Testimonies that
shaped his Trial"
With his counsel by his side, charges were read to Jose in his prison cell on December 1, 1896. He
was accused, Medina ( 1998) disclosed, of being "the principal organizer and the living soul of the
Filipino insurrection, the founder of societies, periodicals and books dedicated to fomenting and
propagating ideas of rebellion."
Jose was not against the jurisdiction of the court, but asserted that he was not guilty of revolution.
" Witnesses against Jose Rizal: Testimonies that
shaped his Trial"
He acknowledged that he authored the Constitution of the Liga Filipina and empliasized that it was
simply a civic alliance. He reiterated that he had no political involvement si11 his exile to Dapitan.
Or: December 13, 1896, Captain Dominguez transmitted Jose's case to the new Governor General of
the Philippines, General Camilo G. de Polavieja who replaced General Ramon Blanco.
"Witnesses against Jose Rizal: Testimonies that
shaped his Trial"
During the time Jose was in prison cell at Fort
Santiago, he penned a manifesto seriously asking the
Filipino people to cease the needless anct tumultuous
war. He encouraged them to attain freedom through
education and habit of working hard and steadily. Palma
(1964) promulgated this manifesto as follows:
My Countrymen ( summarized ):
In this passage, Jose Rizal expresses his deep concern and disappointment regarding the misuse of his name
as a war cry during a rebellion. He clarifies that he had always opposed such uprisings, believing they would
bring suffering and was convinced of their impracticality. Rizal had offered his services, life, and name to
suppress the rebellion and prevent unnecessary misfortunes.
He emphasizes his commitment to the Philippines' quest for freedom but insists that true liberty should be
achieved through education and labor, not violent uprisings. Rizal condemns the rebellion as savage and
disavows any involvement in it, feeling sorry for those who were deceived into participating.
Rizal also criticizes his own trial, describing it as unjust and biased. He highlights the lack of fairness in the
proceedings, the composition of the military court, and the prejudiced nature of the trial.
Overall, Rizal passionately advocates for a peaceful path to liberty, denouncing the rebellion and the flawed
justice system that condemned him.
"The Trial of Jose Rizal : A Confrontation of Fates in the
Cuartel de España"
The trial of Jose commenced in the Cuartel de Espana, a military building, on December 26,
1896, at eight o'clock in the morning. Present in the trial were seven members of the military
court: Lt. Col. Jose Togores Arjona (President), Capt. Ricardo Munoz Arias, Capt. Manuel
Reguerra, Capt. Santiago Izquierdo Osorio, Capt. Braulio Rodriguez Nunez, Capt. Manuel Diaz
Escribano, and Capt. Fermin Perez Rodriguez. Also in the military court were Lt. Don LuisTaviel
de Andrade (Jose's defense counsel) Capt. Rafael Dominguez (Judge Advocate) Lt. Enrique de
Alconcer (Prosecuting Attorney) and observers which included Josephine Bracken, a sister of
Jose, newspapermen, and other Spaniards.
"The Trial of Jose Rizal: A Confrontation of Fates in
the Cuartel de España"
Captain Rafael Dominguez, a judge advocate, began the trial against Jose and
explained the charges of rebellion, sedition, and illegal association. Lieutenant
Enrique de Alconcer, the prosecuting lawyer, passionately detailed the accusations
against Jose and urged the military court to sentence him to death. Lieutenant Don
Luis Taviel de Andrade, Jose's defense counsel, made a strong effort to provide a
convincing defense, reminding the judges to be fair and avoid vindictiveness in
their judgment. After the defense, the court allowed Jose to speak, and he
confidently read a supplement to his defense. This supplement is outlined by De
Viana et al (2011).
• He could not be guilty of rebellion, for he advised Dr. Pio Valenzuela in Dapitan not to rise in revolution.
• He did not correspond with the radical, revolutionary elements.
• The revolutionists used his name without his knowledge. If he were guilty he could have escaped in
Singapore.
• If he had a hand in the revolution, he could have escaped in a Moro vinta and would not have built a
home, a hospital, and bought lands in Dapitan .
• If he were the chief of the revolution. Why has not he consulted by the revolutionists?
• It was true he wrote the by-laws of the Liga Filipina, on this a civic association --- not a evolutionary
society.
• The Liga Filipina did not live long, for after the first meeting he was banished to Dapitan and it died out.
• If the Liga was reorganized nine months later, he did not know about it.
• The Liga did not serve the purpose of the revolutionists, othenvise they would not have supplanted it
with the Katipunan.
• If it were true that there were some bitter comments in Rizal's letters, it was because they were written in
1890 when his family was being persecuted, being dispossessed of houses, warehouses, lands, etc. and
his brother and all his brother-in-law were deported.
• His life in Dapitan had been exemplary as the politico-military commanders and missionary priests could
arrest.
• It was not true that the revolution was inspired by his one speech at the house of Dorotea Ongjunco, as
alleged by witnesses whom he would like to confront. His friends knew his opposition to armed
rebellion. Why did the Katipunan send an emissary to Dapitan who was unknown to him? Because those
who knew him were aware that he would never sanction any violent movement.
"The Trial of Jose Rizal: A Confrontation of Fates in
the Cuartel de España"
The biased military court was apathetic to Jose's appeal. After a brief deliberation, the members of the military court agreed
to convict Jose and sentenced him to death. On December 26, 1896, the unjust military court decision was given to Governor
General Camilo G. de Polavieja who asked the judgment of judge advocate General Nicolas de la Pena who confirmed the
death verdict. On December 28, 1896, Governor General Camilo G. de Polavieja signed the court-martial's decision to
execute Jose Rizal. Medina (1998) presented this decree as follows:
Conformably to the foregoing opm10n. I approve the sentence dictated by the Court Martial in the present case, by virtue of
which the death penalty is imposed on the accused Jose Rizal Mercado, which shall be executed by shooting him at 7:00
o'clock in the morning of the 30th of this month in the field of Bagumbayan.
For compliance and the rest may correspond, let this be returned to the Judge Advocate, Captain Don Rafael Dominguez.
Camilo G. de Polavieja
Jose Rizal's Death.
"Jose Rizal's Final Hours: Love, Faith, and
Letters from Death Row"
It was written one night before his execution in Luneta Park in Fort Santiago.
That is why the poem, which literally means My Last Goodbye, is entitled "Mi Ultimo
Adios." Because of the given social condition, this popular literary piece was written in
which he experienced slavery, cruelty and aggression against his beloved fellow men.
Rizal expresses his wish to die for his motherland and bids farewell to his loved ones,
his homeland and all the people he cared for. He hopes that today's youth will continue
what he had just begun for the freedom for which he had fought and he is also grateful
to those Filipinos who had just dedicated their lives for their motherland's affection.
He never resented putting his life in danger and was successfully executed
because of his determination and strong willingness to reform the political aspect of
equality between the Spaniards and the Filipinos, his destiny to die for his country. He
freed those words in his poem just to convey what he had felt during the time he was in
the cell and knowing that it was his last moment to devote his life to his country, but his
cry-laden agenda had not yet been fulfilled.
The wisdom and insight of Rizal upon writing his last poem "Mi Ultimo Adios" is
mirrored in the present on many edges. His love for the nation and many activists is still
formed today to fight for the country, to have freedom of speech and criticism. We are
fighting for our country, just as Rizal and many national heroes are fighting for our
country.
"Jose Rizal's Final Hours: Love, Faith, and Letters from Death
Row"
The advance guard of four soldiers with bayoneted rifles moved. A few meters behind, Rizal walked
calmly, with his defense counsel (Lt Luis Taviel de Andrade) on one side and two Jesuit priests (Fathers
March and Vilaclara) on the other. More wellarmed soldiers marched behind him.
Rizal was dressed elegantly in a black suit, black derby hat, black shoes, white shirt and a black tie.
His arms were tied behind from elbow to elbow, but the rope was quite loose to give his arms freedom
of movement.
To the muffled sounds of the drums, the cavalcade somnolently marched slowly. There was a handful
of spectators lining the street from Fort Santiago to the Plaza de! Palacio in front of the Manila
Cathedral. Everybody seemed to be out at Bagumbayan where a vast crowd gathered to see how a
martyr dies.
“Jose Rizal's Last Walk:"
As Jose calmly made his way to Bagumbayan, he remarked about the beauty and serenity
of the morning, uttered a few observations about Corregidor, the mountains or Cavite and
the Ateneo College. Upon reaching the place of execution, Jose noticed the very large
number of prying persons and soldiers waiting for them. After final blessings were
bestowed on him he said his adieu to Fr. March, Fr. Villaclara and Lt. Taviel de Andrade.
Jose's request that he be shot facing the firing squad was denied because there was an
order to shoot him in the back. The normal pulse of Jose, felt by Dr. Felipe Ruiz Castillo,
a Spanish military doctor, proved that he did not fear death. Above the beating of the
drums that filled the air was the cold-blooded command "Fuego" (Fire) which ended
Jose's life. He fell to the ground three minutes past seven o'clock in the morning and was
declared dead.
Expectedly, the passing away of Jose Rizal's was greeted with joy by his enemies. On the
contrary, those who love, respected and supported him were brokenhearted and painfully
inflamed. For them, he died a hero and martyr to Philippine freedom.
Thank You .