India's Jurisprudential Perspective
India's Jurisprudential Perspective
India's Jurisprudential Perspective
Sunil Sondhi
Tagore National Fellow
Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts
Majority opinion was that “in the context in which it is used, the word
recommendation would mean a consultative process” between the
Central Board and the Central Government and “It cannot be said that there
was no conscious, effective, meaningful and purposeful consultation”.
The RBI Act says, “On recommendation of the Central Board, the Central
Government may, by notification in the Gazette of India, declare….”.
Legal Culture
The idea of legal culture has had an important place in recent debates about
the nature and aims of law. The concept of legal culture means that
law should be treated as embedded in the broader culture of
society. In a sense, law is culture. Concept of legal culture encompasses
much more than the professional juristic realm. It refers to a more general
consciousness or experience of law that is widely shared by those who
constitute a nation.
The nature of the Indian society is such even today that the Western
positivist notions of law do not touch the reality of the way most people
understand and live their lives. A juridical system that does not
correspond to the social and cultural sensitivities of a society can
not be owned by the people as their system but will be seen as
something foreign and imposed. Without a conducive social and
cultural conceptualization mere formal law cannot create willing legal and
moral obligation.
Western Legal Tradition
In general, in the Western legal tradition law is quite indifferent
to morals. It is insisted that law and morals are to be kept apart
sedulously. Morality and morals are conceived of as for the legislator or the
student of legislation, the one making specific, objective laws out of the raw
materials of morality, the other studying how this is done and how it ought
to be done; but it is considered that they are not matters for the judge or the
jurist.
It is also generally held that the judge applies the rules which are
given to him, while the legal scholars and lawyers study these rules,
analyze and systematize them, and work out their logical content. This
assumes that law is a body of rules- Bentham, Austin and Maine
were major jurists of 19th century who developed the positivist and analytical
jurisprudence and insisted vigorously on the separation of law and morals.
Vedic Legal Tradition
The absence of a single key word for ‘law’ in Sanskrit has given rise
to misconceptions that ancient Indians were somehow deficient in legal
theorising and lacked a clear conceptualisation of ‘law’. The field of
jurisprudence now needs to be re-examined, to show the rich plurality of
meanings of what are in fact various types and conceptualisations of ‘law’ in
Indian tradition.
Indian legal tradition was never a western-style legal system with codes and
cases but respected at all times the relativity and context of justice based on
natural law principles. Dharma is based outside the realm of the
human, but there is a subtle link and correspondence between
cosmic order and human existence. Individual freedom rests on
socially operative normative order to which ruler is also accountable.
The term dharma denotes neither just ‘religion’ nor ‘law’, but the
moralised duty, placed upon every individual, to contribute to
macrocosmic as well as microcosmic order. In other words, the
central expectation is that an individual will strive to do the right thing at the
right time and will give his best for the good society of which he is an integral
part.
Dandaniti MS
After ascertaining the motive, the time and place, and taking
into consideration the condition and the nature of the offence,
punishment shall be given to those deserving punishment. MS 126
Punishment shall be given by persons of integrity in the form of
either reprimand, reproach, fine, or capital punishment. MS 12
Unjust punishment is destructive of reputation and subversive of
fame; it leads to loss of righteousnes; must therefore be avoided.
MS 127
The dharmasastra had at the same time evolved and defined the
safeguards against the hasty or improper use of the right of self
defense no less carefully than the modern Indian penal code.
(Vishnu Smriti)