Mid Sem Presentation
Mid Sem Presentation
Mid Sem Presentation
OF WELDING
GROUP MEMBERS:
SAHIL NAGULA B201210ME GUIDED BY
YEKESH TADIKONDA B201186ME DR.VINEESH
K.P
KARANAM UMA MAHESWAR B201200ME
CHANVITH REDDY DEVIREDDY B201194ME
SHREYASH ASHOK SALUNKHE B201213ME
INTRODUCTION
• Current FEM solvers won’t consider the liquid
part in the melt pool, but we consider the liquid
part in the melt pool by including the
convection term to accurate the temperature
distribution inside the melt pool compared to
FEM solvers.
• The Effects to be considered :
Maragoni Effect
Bouyancy Effect
Modeling of heat transfer and Zhang, W., Roy, G.G., Elmer, J.W. To understand the importance of
fluid flow during gas tungsten and DebRoy, T. heat transfer by conduction and
arc spot welding of low carbon convection through various stages
steel
• Governing equations-
1)Navier stokes equation.
2) Continuity equation.
WORK BRIEFING
Continuity and Navier Stokes Equation
For obtaining velocity plot
(Mass and force conservation)
No
Verifying Boundary Conditions No
Solution convergence
Results plotting
END
WORK DONE DETAILS 1
• Solved a basic LID driven cavity problem by giving an initial velocity at the top surface
and obtained velocities and pressures using Continuity and Navier Stokes Equation
• Observation-
2*distance<size
YES
Maximum Temperature decreases exponentially NO
END
WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• Executed a code for generating heat source in 2D scenario
Fig8 Heat source at the centre of the cube Fig9 Heat source at the edge of the cube
WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• Executed a code for generating heat source in 3D scenario considering a
Square Heat Source
Fig10 Heat source at the centre of the cube Fig11 Heat source at the edge of the cube
WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• Observations-
• Inside the heat source the temperature decreases exponentially along distance from the
mentioned maximum temperature
• Outside the heat source the temperature decreases exponentially along distance from the
mentioned edge temperature
• The temperature is maximum at the centre of the heat source
• The temperature decreases exponentially along the depth as well
WORK DONE DETAILS 3
DENSITY(KG/M^3) 4000
VISCOSITY(KG/M S) 0.004
PARAMETER VALUE
LASER POWER(W) 2000
TIME STEP(Sec) 10
WORK DONE DETAILS 3
No
Verifying Boundary Conditions No
Solution convergence
END
WORK DONE DETAILS 3
Marangoni effect in 2D case
Fig 14. Temperature plot at t=0 for 2D case Fig 15. Temperature plot at t=10 sec for 2D case
WORK DONE DETAILS 3
Marangoni effect in 3D case
Fig12 Temperature plot at t=0 sec Fig13 Temperature plot at t=10 sec
WORK REMAINING
• The mass transfer will be from the center of the melt pool to the boundary side
due to surface tension gradient present inside the melt pool.
• The variation of temperature from the center to the boundary is in decreasing
trend so the mass transfer will be from the center of melt pool to the boundary
side.
• Liquid consideration helps to consider the convection flow as well in the melt
pool which helps to predict the temperature much more accurately.
REFERENCES