Mid Sem Presentation

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 28

MODELLING THE MELT POOL

OF WELDING
GROUP MEMBERS:
SAHIL NAGULA B201210ME GUIDED BY
YEKESH TADIKONDA B201186ME DR.VINEESH
K.P
KARANAM UMA MAHESWAR B201200ME
CHANVITH REDDY DEVIREDDY B201194ME
SHREYASH ASHOK SALUNKHE B201213ME
INTRODUCTION
• Current FEM solvers won’t consider the liquid
part in the melt pool, but we consider the liquid
part in the melt pool by including the
convection term to accurate the temperature
distribution inside the melt pool compared to
FEM solvers.
• The Effects to be considered :
 Maragoni Effect
 Bouyancy Effect

Fig1 Temperature v/s time


OBJECTIVE

• Development of python code to predict the temperature distribution inside the


melt pool during welding and manufacturing process.

• Incorporate the effect of surface tension gradient (Marangoni effect) and


buoyancy effect to estimate heat loss from the melt pool.
LITERATURE REVIEW

Title of the paper Author Major findings

Modeling of heat transfer and Zhang, W., Roy, G.G., Elmer, J.W. To understand the importance of
fluid flow during gas tungsten and DebRoy, T. heat transfer by conduction and
arc spot welding of low carbon convection through various stages
steel

An improved prediction of Mukherjee, T., Zhang, W. Material properties and heat


residual stresses and distortion source conditions
in additive manufacturing
WORK BRIEFING

• Governing equations-
1)Navier stokes equation.

2) Continuity equation.
WORK BRIEFING
Continuity and Navier Stokes Equation
For obtaining velocity plot
(Mass and force conservation)

Heat Source For Initial Temperature plot

For effective Temperature after


Energy equation and Marangoni Effect
some time
SUMMARY OF WORK PRESENTED
• Executed a code for
obtaining velocities using
continuity and Navier Stokes
equation
• For that we have considered
a standard Lid Driven Cavity
problem
• Solved it using Finite
Difference Method

Fig.2 Velocity Plot


SUMMARY OF WORK PRESENTED
• Executed a code for proving Marangoni effect in 2D scenario

Fig3 Temperature plot Fig4 Velocity plot


WORK DONE SINCE LAST PRESENTATION
TILL NOW

• Executed a code for velocities in 3D scenario using continuity and


Navier Stokes equation
• Executed a code for generating a heat source
• Proving the Marangoni effect in 3D case as well as in 2D case considering the
heat source.
Creating a staggered grid

Inducing velocity and pressure

Continuity eqn Momentum eqn

Updating the values

No
Verifying Boundary Conditions No

Solution convergence

Results plotting

END
WORK DONE DETAILS 1
• Solved a basic LID driven cavity problem by giving an initial velocity at the top surface
and obtained velocities and pressures using Continuity and Navier Stokes Equation

Fig5 Velocity Plot Fig 6 Pressure Plot


WORK DONE DETAILS 1

• Observation-

• There is a pressure difference observed inside the lid and no pressure


difference across the edges.
• There will be a turbulence induced inside due to pressure difference .
• The results are observed as soon as the initial condition of velocities are given.
WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• For Generating Heat source
Creating a Staggered Grid

Considering the size and shape of the heat source

Maximum Temperature of the heat source and edge temperature

2*distance<size
YES
Maximum Temperature decreases exponentially NO

Edge Temperature decreases exponentially

END
WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• Executed a code for generating heat source in 2D scenario

Fig7 Temperature plot in 2D


WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• Executed a code for generating heat source in 3D scenario considering a
Elliptical Heat Source

Fig8 Heat source at the centre of the cube Fig9 Heat source at the edge of the cube
WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• Executed a code for generating heat source in 3D scenario considering a
Square Heat Source

Fig10 Heat source at the centre of the cube Fig11 Heat source at the edge of the cube
WORK DONE DETAILS 2
• Observations-

• Inside the heat source the temperature decreases exponentially along distance from the
mentioned maximum temperature
• Outside the heat source the temperature decreases exponentially along distance from the
mentioned edge temperature
• The temperature is maximum at the centre of the heat source
• The temperature decreases exponentially along the depth as well
WORK DONE DETAILS 3

 Properties of the material

PROPERTIES TI-6AL-4V (MATERIAL)

LIQIDUS TEMPERATURE(K) 1928

THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY(W/MK) 1.57

SPECIFIC HEAT(J/KGK) 492.4

DENSITY(KG/M^3) 4000

VISCOSITY(KG/M S) 0.004

SURFACE TENSION GRADIENT(N/M^2) -0.00037


WORK DONE DETAILS 3

 Process parameters used for heat source

PARAMETER VALUE
LASER POWER(W) 2000

MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE(K) 3000

TIME STEP(Sec) 10
WORK DONE DETAILS 3

• General Energy Equation-

• Discretized Energy Equation-


WORK DONE DETAILS 3

• Marangoni effect equation-

Discretised equation of the above Marangoni effect-


Creating a staggered grid

Inducing velocity temperature and pressure

Continuity eqn Momentum eqn Energy eqn

Updating the values

No
Verifying Boundary Conditions No

Solution convergence

Results plotting after 10 seconds

END
WORK DONE DETAILS 3
Marangoni effect in 2D case

Fig 14. Temperature plot at t=0 for 2D case Fig 15. Temperature plot at t=10 sec for 2D case
WORK DONE DETAILS 3
Marangoni effect in 3D case

Fig12 Temperature plot at t=0 sec Fig13 Temperature plot at t=10 sec
WORK REMAINING

• Obtaining the temperature by considering the combined heat transfer through


both conduction and convection
• Introducing the effect of Buoyancy effect into the code
CONCLUSION

• The mass transfer will be from the center of the melt pool to the boundary side
due to surface tension gradient present inside the melt pool.
• The variation of temperature from the center to the boundary is in decreasing
trend so the mass transfer will be from the center of melt pool to the boundary
side.
• Liquid consideration helps to consider the convection flow as well in the melt
pool which helps to predict the temperature much more accurately.
REFERENCES

• Mukherjee, T., Zhang, W. and Debroy, T., 2017. An improved prediction of


residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing. Computational
Materials Science, 126, pp.360-372.
• Zhang, W., Roy, G.G., Elmer, J.W. and DebRoy, T., 2003. Modeling of heat
transfer and fluid flow during gas tungsten arc spot welding of low carbon
steel. Journal of Applied Physics, 93(5), pp.3022-3033.
THANK YOU!

You might also like