CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete

Mathematics
01/31/12
Ming-Hsuan Yang
UC Merced

1
1.7 Introduction to proofs
• Proof: valid argument that establishes the truth of a
mathematical statement, e.g., theorem
• A proof can use hypotheses, axioms, and previously
proven theorems
• Formal proofs: can be extremely long and difficult to
follow
• Informal proofs: easier to understand and some of
the steps may be skipped, or axioms are not
explicitly stated

2
Some terminology
• Theorem: a mathematical statement that can be shown to be
true
• Proposition: less important theorem
• Axiom (postulate): a statement that is assumed to be true
• Lemma: less important theorem that is helpful in the proof of
other results
• Corollary: a theorem that can be established directly from a
theorem that has been proved
• Conjecture: a statement proposed to be true, but not proven
yet

3
Direct proofs of p→q
• First assume p is true
• Then show q must be true (using axioms,
definitions, and previously proven theorems)
• So the combination of p is true and q is false
never occurs
• Thus p→q is true
• Straightforward
• But sometimes tricky and require some insight
4
Example
• Definition:
– The integer n is even if there exists an integer k
such that n=2k, and
– n is odd if there exists an integer k such that
n=2k+1
– Note that an integer is either even or odd
• Show “If n is an odd integer, then n2 is odd”

5
Example
• Note the theorem states n( p(n)  q(n))
• By definition of odd integer, n=2k+1, where k
is some integer
• n2=(2k+1)2=4k2+4k+1=2(2k2+2k)+1
• By definition of odd integer, we conclude n2 is
an odd integer
• Consequently, we prove that if n is an odd
integer, then n2 is odd
6
Example
• “If m and n are both perfect squares, then nm is
also a perfect square (an integer a is a perfect
square if there is an integer b such that a=b2)
• By definition, there are integers s and t such
that m=s2, and n=t2
• Thus, mn=s2t2=(st)2 (using commutativity and
associativity of multiplication)
• We conclude mn is also a perfect square

7
Proof by contraposition
• Indirect proof: sometimes direct proof leads
to dead ends
• Based on p  q  q  p
• Use ┐q as hypothesis and show ┐p must follow

8
Example
• Show that “if n is an integer and 3n+2 is odd,
then n is odd”
• Use p  q  q  p
• Proof by contraposition:
– Assume n is even, i.e., n=2k, for some k
– It follows 3n+2=3(2k)+2=6k+2=2(3k+1)
– Thus 3n+2 is even

9
Example
• Prove that if n=ab, where a and b are positive
integers, then a  n or b  n
p  q  q  p

Assume (a  n  b  n )
a  n b  n
ab  n  n  n
ab  n

10
Vacuous proof
• Prove p→q is true
• Vacuous proof: If we show p is false and then
claim a proof of p→q
– However, often used to establish special case
• Show that p(0) is true when p(n) is “If n>1, then
n2>n” and the domain consists of all integers
• The fact 02>0 is false is irrelevant to the truth
value of the conditional statement

11
Trivial proof
• Trivial proof: a proof of p→q that uses the fact
q is true
– Often important when special cases are proved
• Let p(n) be “If a and b are positive integers with
a≥b, then an ≥bn where the domain consists of
all integers
• The proposition p(0) is “If a≥b, then a0 ≥b0”. a0
≥b0 is true, hence the conditional statement
p(0) is true
12
Example
• Definition: the real number r is rational if there
exist integers p and q with q≠0 such that r=p/q
• A real number that is not rational is irrational
• Prove that the sum of two rational numbers is
rational (i.e., “For every real number r and
every real number s, if r and s are rational
numbers, then r+s is rational”)
• Direct proof? Proof by contraposition?

13
Direct proof
• Let r=p/q and s=t/u where p, q, t, u, are
integers and q≠0, and u≠0.
• r+s=p/q+t/u=(pu+qt)/qu
• Since q≠0 and u≠0, qu≠0
• Consequently, r+s is the ratio of two integers.
Thus r+s is rational

14
 Example
• Prove that if n is an integer and n2 is odd, then
n is odd
• Direct proof? Proof by contraposition?
p : n 2 is odd
q : n is odd
Direct proof : Let n 2  2k  1, then n  2k  1
Proof by contradiction : n  2k , it follows that n 2  4k 2  2(2k 2 )

15
Proof by contradiction
• Suppose we want to prove a statement p
• Further assume that we can find a
contradiction q such that ┐p→q is true
• Since q is false, but ┐p→q is true, we can
conclude ┐p is false, which means p is true
• The statement ┐r˄r is contradiction, we can
prove that p is true if we can show that
┐p→(┐r˄r), i.e., if p is not true, then there is a
contradiction
16
Example
• Show that at least 4 of any 22 days must fall on the same
day of the week
• Let p be the proposition “at least 4 of any 22 days fall on
the same day of the week”
• Suppose ┐p is true, which means at most 3 of 22 days fall
on the same day of the week
• Which implies at most 21 days could have been chosen
because for each of the days of the week, at most 3 of the
chosen days could fall on that day
• If r is the statement that 22 days are chosen. Then, we
have
┐p→(┐r˄r) 17
Example
• Prove that 2 is irrational by giving a proof by
contradiction
• Let p be the proposition “ 2is irrational”
• ┐p: 2 is rational, and thus 2  a / bwhere a and
b have no common factors
• Thus 2=a2/b2, 2b2=a2, and thus a2 is even
• a2 is even and so a is even (can easily show if n2 is
even, then n is even). Let a=2c for some integer c,
2b2=a2=4c2, and thus b2=2c2, and b2 is even
18
Example
• Since b2 is even, b must be even
• ┐p leads to 2  a / b where and b have no
common factors, and both a and b are even
(and thus a common factor), a contradiction
• That is, the statement “ 2 is irrational” is true

19
Proof by contradiction
• Can be used to prove conditional statements
• First assume the negation of the conclusion
• Then use premises and negation of conclusion
to arrive a contradiction
• Reason: p→q≡((p˄┐q)→F)

20
Proof by contradiction
• Can rewrite a proof by contraposition of a
conditional statement p→q as proof by
contradiction
• Proof by contraposition: show if ┐q then ┐p
• Proof by contradiction: assume p and ┐q are
both true
• Then use steps of ┐q→┐p to show ┐p is true
• This leads to ┐q→p˄┐p, a contradiction
21
Example
• Proof by contradiction “If 3n+2 is odd, then n is
odd”
• Let p be “3n+2 is odd” and q be “n is odd”
• To construct a proof by contradiction, assume
both p and ┐q are both true
• Since n is even, let n=2k, then 3n+2=6k+2=
2(3k+1). So 3n+2 is even, i.e. ┐p,
• Both p and ┐p are true, so we have a
contradiction
22
Example
• Note that we can also prove by contradiction
that p→q is true by assuming that p and ┐q
are both true, and show that q must be also
true
• This implies q and ┐q are both true, a
contradiction
• Can turn a direct proof into a proof by
contradiction

23
Proof of equivalence
• To prove a theorem that is a biconditional
statement p↔q, we show p→q and q →p
• The validity is based on the tautology
(p↔q) ↔((p→q)˄(q →p))

24
Example
• Prove the theorem “If n is a positive integer,
then n is odd if and only if n2 is odd”
• To prove “p if and only if q” where p is “n is
odd” and q is “n2 is odd”
• Need to show p→q and q→p
“If n is odd, then n2 is odd”, and “If n2 is odd,
then n is odd
• We have proved p→q and q→p in previous
examples and thus prove this theorem with iff
25
Equivalent theorems
• p1↔p2↔…↔pn
• For i and j with 1≤i≤n and 1≤j≤n, pi and pj are
equivalent
[p1↔p2↔…↔pn] ↔[(p1→ p2)˄(p2→ p3) ˄…
˄(pn→ p1)]
• More efficient than prove pi→ pj for i≠j with
1≤i≤n and 1≤j≤n
• Order is not important as long as we have chain
26
Example
• Show that these statements about integer n
are equivalent
– P1: n is even
– P2: n-1 is odd
– P3: n2 is even
• Show that by p1→ p2 and p2→ p3 and p3→ p1
• p1→ p2 : (direct proof) Suppose n is even, then
n=2k for some k. thus n-1=2k-1=2(k-1)+1 is odd
27
Example
• p2→ p3 : (direct proof) Suppose n-1 is odd,
then n-1=2k+1 for some k. Hence n=2k+2, and
n2=(2k+2)2=4k2+8k+4=2(2k2+4k+2) is even
• p3→ p1: (proof by contraposition) That is, we
prove that if n is not even, then n2 is not even.
This is the same as proving if n is odd, then n2
is odd (which we have done)

28
Counterexample
• To show that a statement xp(x) is false, all we
need to do is to find a counterexample, i.e.,
an example x for which p(x) is false

29
Example
• Show that “Every positive integer is the sum
of the squares of two integers” is false
• An counterexample is 3 as it cannot be written
as the sum of the squares to two integers
• Note that the only perfect squares not
exceeding 3 are 02=0 and 12=1
• Furthermore, there is no way to get 3 as the
sum of two terms each of which is 0 or 1

30
Mistakes in proofs
• What is wrong with this proof “1=2”?
1. a=b (given)
2. a2=ab (multiply both sides of 1 by a)
3. a2-b2 =ab-b2 (subtract b2 from both sides of 2)
4. (a-b)(a+b)=b(a-b) (factor both sides of 3)
5. a+b=b (divide both sides of 4 by a-b)
6. 2b=b (replace a by b in 5 as a=b and simply)
7. 2=1 (divide both sides of 6 by b)

31
What is wrong with this proof?
• “Theorem”: If n2 is positive, then n is positive
“Proof”: Suppose n2 is positive. As the
statement “If n is positive, then n2 is positive” is
true, we conclude that n is positive
• p(n): If n is positive, q(n): n2 is positive. The
statement is n( p(n)  q(n)) and the hypothesis is
q(n). From these, we cannot conclude p(n) as
no valid rule of inference can be applied
• Counterexample: n=-1
32
What is wrong with this proof?
• “Theorem”: If n is not positive, then n2 is not
positive
“Proof”: Suppose that n is not positive. Because
the conditional statement “If n is positive, then
n2 is positive” is true, we can conclude that n2 is
not positive.
• From n( p(n)  q(n)) and p(n)we cannot conclude
q (n) as no valid rule of inference can be used
• Counterexample: n=-1
33
Circular reasoning
• Is the following argument correct?
Suppose that n2 is even, then n2=2k for some
integer k. Let n=2y for some integer y. This
shows that n is even
• Wrong argument as the statement “n=2y for
some integer y” is used in the proof
• No argument shows n can be written as 2y
• Circular reasoning as this statement is
equivalent to the statement being proved
34
Proofs
• Learn from mistakes
• Even professional mathematicians make
mistakes in proofs
• Quite a few incorrect proofs of important
results have fooled people for years before
subtle errors were found
• Some other important proof techniques
– Mathematical induction
– Combinatorial proof
35