Scribd
Upload
4 views

Lighting

Uploaded by

nk01101978
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views

Lighting

Uploaded by

nk01101978
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

Lighting/Illumination/Reflection

Model
Some of the contents used in this lecture belong
to…

• Dr Jon Shiach, Manchester Metropoliton University, “Direct Lighting Model”,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CdS8oOJtVA
• Mr. Jacobson, University of Toronto, “WebGL Phong Shading”,
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jacobson/phong-demo/
• RapidCompact, “Simplifying a 3D Mesh”,
https://rapidcompact.com/doc/cli/latest/Simplify/index.html
Basic Terms
• Illumination: the transport of energy from light
sources to surfaces & points
– Local illumination
– Global illumination
• Lighting model or Illumination model: Express the
factors determining a surface’s color or luminous
intensity (outgoing or reflected light) at a particular
3D point
Components of Illumination
• Two components of illumination:
1. Light sources
2. Surface properties
• Light source described by a luminance/intensity ‘I’
– Each color is described separately
– I = [Ir Ig Ib]
• Types of Light Sources:
1. Ambient Light
2. Diffuse Light
3. Spot Light
Ambient Light
• No identifiable source or direction
• Product of multiple reflections of light from the many
surfaces present in the environment
• Computationally inexpensive
Ambient Light
Categories:
1. Global ambient light
– Independent of light source
– Lights entire scene
– Example: reflection of sunlight from several surfaces
2. Local ambient light
– Contributed by additional light sources
– Can be different for each light and primary color
– Example: Reflection of fluorescent lamps from several
surfaces
Ambient Reflection Coefficient
• Effect of adding ambient light to the diffuse light reflected by
a sphere
• Diffuse source intensity is 1.0
Diffuse reflection coefficient is 0.4
Ambient source intensity is 1.0
• Moving from left to right the ambient reflection coefficient
takes on values: 0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7
– Too little ambient light makes shadows too deep and harsh
– Too much makes the picture look washed out and bland
Diffuse Reflection Coefficient
• Id = max {Is kd cosθ, 0}
• Source intensity is 1.0
• Background intensity is 0.4
• Sphere reflecting diffuse light, for six reflection coefficients:
0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.
Angle θ between
surface normal and
incident light is > 90o

⮚What is the ambient


component here?
⮚What is the specular
component?
Specular Coefficient - Determines
Specular Light Intensity

Shininess Factor - Determines


Surface Smoothness
Specular Reflection Coefficient
• The ambient and diffuse reflection coefficients are 0.1 and 0.4
for all spheres.
• Id = Is ks (cos φ)k More shiny and more
highly concentrated along
the direction r
Exponent, k
3 6 9 25 200
More mirror like,
more focused
0.25 reflection with
reflection
coefficient, increasing
ks exponent
0.5

0.75
Iaka + Ip [kd max {(L.N),0} + ks max{(R.V)k ,0}] = I
Mathematical Calculation of Phong Model
We need to incorporate the effect light present in environment. Thus total refelcted
light also includes ambient component.
Ambient Component = Iaka
Total reflected light intensity from Q,
I = Ambient Component + Diffuse Component + Specular Component
= Iaka + Ip kd (L.N) + Ip ks (R.V)k

More specifically,
I = Iaka + Ip [kd max {(L.N),0} + ks max{(R.V)k ,0}]
Additional Issues
When there are n light sources in the scene, their effects are cumulative: Intensity at Q,
I = Iaka + ∑(i=1 to n) Ipi {kd (L.N) + ks (R.V)k }
The intesnsity of red, green and blue component of reflected light,
Ir = Iakar + Ip kdr (L.N) + Ip ks (R.V)k
Ig = Iakag + Ip kdg (L.N) + Ip ks (R.V)k
Ib = Iakab + Ip kdb (L.N) + Ip ks (R.V)k
ks : coefficient for specular component which is same as the color of light source,
not affected by surface color.
Photo: Alex Canclini
Shading
• The process of assigning colors to pixels.

Shading

Flat Shading Smooth Shading

Gouraud Shading Phong Shading


Shading Model
• Flat Shading
– Compute Phong lighting once for entire polygon
• Gouraud Shading
– Compute Phong lighting at the vertices and interpolate
lighting values across polygon
• Phong Shading
– Interpolate normals across polygon and perform Phong
lighting across polygon
Flat Shading
• For each polygon
– Determines a single intensity value at a chosen point on
the polygon
– Uses that value to shade the entire polygon

• Assumptions
– Light source at infinity
– Viewer at infinity
– The polygon represents the actual surface being modeled
Problems of Flat Shading
• Specular highlights tends to get lost
• If chosen point on polygon is at location of the light
source, then color of the polygon will be significantly
distorted.

Flat Shading
Smooth Shading
• Introduce vertex normals at each
vertex
– Used only for shading
– Think of as a better approximation of the real surface that
the polygons approximate
– Finds color value for each point in the polygon individually
• Two types
– Gouraud Shading
– Phong Shading (do not confuse with Phong Lighting Model)
Gouraud Shading
• Most common approach
• Perform Phong lighting at the vertices
• Linearly interpolate the resulting colors over faces
– Along edges
– Along scanline
Gouraud Shading
color3
ytop
y4 color4
color2
ys
ybott color1

xleft xright

Xright- Xleft
Gouraud Shading
color3
ytop
y4 color4
color2
ys
ybott color1

xleft xright

Xright- Xleft
Calculate the surface normals
along the scan line and the edge
using incremental approach
Problem of Gouraud Shading
– Often appears dull
– Lacks accurate specular component

C1

C3

C2 Can’t shade the spot light


Phong Shading
Interpolate normal vectors of face vertices at each pixel, then
perform Phong lighting at each pixel.
m3 ys - y 1
m4 m2 mleft = m1 + (m4-m1)
mleft
mx
mright Y4 - y1
ys - y 1
ys mright = m1 + (m2-m1)
m1 Y2 - y1

x
x - xleft
mx= mleft + (mright - mleft)
x right - xleft
Calculate the surface normals along the scan line
and the edge using incremental approach
Phong vs Gouraud Shading
• Phong shading is more smooth
• If a highlight does not fall on a vertex, Gouraud shading may
miss it completely, but Phong shading does not.
Reference:

Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice: John F. Hughes, James D. Foley, Andries van Dam,
Steven K. Feiner (2nd Edition)
Chapter: 16.1.1 - 16.1.4, 16.1.6, 16.2.1 - 16.2.5

You might also like