New Seven Sisters: Group 3: Abhishek Kumar Anuj Malviya Mohit Kapoor Ravi Dudeja Stuti Sethi
New Seven Sisters: Group 3: Abhishek Kumar Anuj Malviya Mohit Kapoor Ravi Dudeja Stuti Sethi
New Seven Sisters: Group 3: Abhishek Kumar Anuj Malviya Mohit Kapoor Ravi Dudeja Stuti Sethi
Group 3: Abhishek Kumar Anuj Malviya Mohit Kapoor Ravi Dudeja Stuti Sethi
AGENDA AGENDA
Current Iran Crisis New Seven Sisters
PDVSA (Venezuela)
Saudi Aramco
(Saudi Arabia) Petrobras (Brazil)
NIOC
(Iran) CNPC (China) Gazprom (Russia) Petronas (Malaysia)
Iran 137
Iraq 115
(January 7, 2012 )
IRAN - Sanctions
EU Sanctions US Sanctions Asia
Ban new contracts to import petroleum and petroleum products from Iran and to end existing contracts by 1 July 2012
sanction banks, refiners and traders worldwide who buy Iranian oil
China, India and other significant non EU countries are unlikely to sign up to any full oil embargo
Tighter Western sanctions mean such customers will be able to insist on deeper discounts for Iranian oil, reducing Tehran's revenues
US can choose to cut the entities (involved with the purchase of Iranian oil) off from the US financial system
The new seven sisters- most influential energy companies from countries outside the OECD, have been identified by the Financial Times in consultation with numerous industry executives.
Of the world proven reserves of 1148 billions barrels. approximately 77% controlled by NOCs (no equity participation by the foreign international oil companies). Of the top 20 oil producing companies,14 are NOCs.
Saudi Aramco
(A Saudi Arabian NOC)
State owned national oil company
1950: King Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud threatened to nationalize pressuring Aramco to agree to share profits 50/50
Saudi Arabian government acquired a 25% stake in Aramco. It increased its shareholding to 60% by 1974, and finally took full control of Aramco by 1980
1936: Texas Oil Company (Texaco) purchased a 50% stake of the concession
1988: a Royal Decree changed name from Arabian American Oil Company to Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)
28-03-2012
Rise of Gazprom
Largest extractor of natural gas in world and largest company of Russia Soviet Gas Industry was created in 1943 which was centralized in 1965 1989 - became Gazprom but still held by state 1991- dissolution of Soviet Union- Monopolisation of Gazprom in Russia Privatization started in 1993 though state retained 40% of shares Company chairman held a powerful position
Controversies
Asset Stripping/Tax Evasion Critics claim Gazprom is all about politics
Tower Controversy
Influence of Gazprom
Yielded considerable influence over price Subjugated Ukraine and Europe at large Europes Dangerous Dependence on Russia Pipeline Control and unlimited access to resources
Russian federal law legalized the exclusive right of Gazprom to export natural gas to Europe
Conclusion : Russia using Gazprom as a political weapon
Rise of Petrobras
Created in 1953- granted sole rights over domestic upstream oil exploration and production
reduced scope at home - ventured further overseas - starting with Braspetro in 1972
Producing and exploring for oil in a variety of different places around the world diversifies risk and lowers international financing costs
Since 1992, 1% of gross receipts -earmarked for R&D 2007-08 R&D expenditures similar BP and Shell and in excess of USand EU-based IOCs (Exxon, Chevron and Conoco etc.) Moved to the deepwater exploration
Reserves outside Brazil were < 12 % in 2002, rose to 17 % by 2010 Discovery of the Tupi oil field off Brazils southeastern coast in 2007 potential to transform Brazil into a global energy powerhouse
Bolivian Controversy
On May 2006, Bolivia's president Evo Morales announced the nationalization of all gas and oil fields in the country.
Petrobras was heavily affected by the nationalization -the company's Bolivian subsidiary had great importance in the country's economy
The company operated in 46% of the oil reserves in Bolivia and was responsible for 75% of the country's gas exports to Brazil Nationalization strained relationship between Petrobras and Bolivian govt. On October 28, 2006, Petrobras and Bolivia signed an agreement, whereby the company would take 18% of the profits, and the Bolivian govt would take the remainder
formed due to tensions between the British-owned Anglo-Persian Oil Company-and British Petroleum Company in 1954-and the Persian and then Iranian government, which came to a head after World War II
NIOC's attempts to take control of the industry weakened - the main international oil companies boycotted Iranian oil exports to demonstrate their support for the British company
September 1954 an eight-member consortium called the Iranian Oil Participants (IOP) was formed
Rise of NIOC
A law in 1957 empowered it to enter into JVs with foreign oil companies to explore areas other than those leased to IOP first joint venture agreement- Italian oil company Agip SpA June 1958 JV agreement was signed with Standard Oil Company of Indiana, jointly owned company with NIOC called the Iran Pan American Oil Company (Ipac) 1960s NIOC heightened its exploration efforts through service contracts Iran's 1987 Petroleum Law allowed for contracts with outside companies under a buyback system
Turn of Events
Nationalization in 1980, NIOC was granted sole control over all upstream operations and activities of the petroleum industry Oil production fell 75 % between 1979 and 1981 1990 crude oil production rose to 2.3 million barrels/day from 2 million in 1988, but refining capacity was still down - NIOC had to import petroleum products from overseas refineries Rehabilitation &development of the Iranian oil industry : re-establishing contracts with Western oil majors to provide technology and expertise NIOC's attempts to establish ties with US investors came to a halt in 1995 when US President Clinton imposed sanctions against Iran
2003 - 32 producing oil fields and net exports of 2.6 million barrels/day Iran largest heavy fuel oil exporter in the Middle East
Presently, NIOC ranks as the world's second largest oil company, after Saudi Arabia's stateowned Aramco
CNPC
On July 27, 1998 Chinese govt decided to restructure and China National Petroleum Corporation establish CNPC in was established on accordance with Sept 17, 1988 principle of upstream and downstream integration Past 20 years, China moved from being East Asias largest oil exporter to becoming the worlds 3rd largest importer of oil in 2008, behind the US & Japan
PDVSA
PDVSA is the national oil company that serves as the conduit of Venezuelan petroleum to world energy markets.
PDVSA
Before 1999 Apertura (the opening up) strategy in the 90s The Apertura helped thrust PDVSA into a competitive environment After 1999
(especially with the experience of the events of April 2002 and the subsequent oil strike)
Govt. retaking of control through the following elements : Increased taxes and royalties for oil extracted Elimination of the oil concessions & transition to these joint ventures Creation of subsidiaries of PDVSA- part of the activities had been outsourced PDVSAs international expansion, especially within the membership of ALBA, South America and other allied countries such as China
PDVSA
Till 2007, PDVSAs main export destinations were US Canada and the Caribbean Central America markets
The Chinese and South American potential had not yet been met
28-03-2012
28-03-2012
Management Shares
License regulations
Russia :
A striking example of the Petronas effort to go global was its 2006 purchase of US$1.1 billion stake in Russias Rosneft, its first Russian venture. Economic Reasons: Domestic reserves were never of the class of those in Indonesia or the Middle East and declined in spite of conservation Programs. Political reasons: The interest of then Prime Minister Mohammad Mahathir (anti US) in placing Malaysia more firmly on the international stage.
28-03-2012
State Owned Emerged as Superpowers in their respective countries Yielded Political influence on dependant countries Pipeline Politics The more you sell, the more you gain Sooner or later, the state-owned enterprises are bound to fail, either through inefficiency or as victims of political expediency