Shortcut: WD:AN

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Report concerning User:Ninijyo

Ninijyo (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: ―呉野 (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

私は普段、日本語版Wikipediaで活動しており、Wikidataのことがわからないので、間違った場所に依頼していたらすみません。この利用者の編集は無根拠・間違い・差別的などの問題があり、保護されていない項目は私が修正しましたが、次の2つの項目は保護されており、修正ができませんでした。

この利用者は日本語版で無期限ブロックされていますが（Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/Ninijyo）、日本語版Wikipediaで指摘された問題行動を、Wikidataで引き続き行っています。Wikidataでもブロックした方がいいと思います。--呉野 (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Penn Station: could you please check this request?--S8321414 (talk) 13:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support to block, because this user stick on discrimination and uncertain informations. Kokage si (talk) 11:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support to block. I also checked situations on the Japanese Wikipedia and commons. This user shows some apologies when warned, but later repeats same mistakes. It seems that he/she puts his/her own obsession before the rules. I cannot hope for voluntary improvement from such persons, and I believe we have no choice but to force his/her to stop editing. 本日晴天 (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Kambaiyu75

Item/lexeme creations and statements added by this user for the most part are nonsense. E.g. their last item Afan (Q131279322) has two statements that don't add up, and there's no other information based on which the item could be cleared up. In their lexemes like invalid ID (L1378339) all statements individually are nonsense. Hard to say if they deliberately enter nonsense or if they just have no understanding of what they are doing. Probably all their items/lexemes should be deleted and user should be blocked. 2001:7D0:81F8:9A80:EC43:3A7B:4AED:5ED7 09:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kambaiyu75 please explain what you are doing? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have partially blocked the user from the main namespace as a precaution. I will wait a little longer for an explanation before deleting those items/lexemes — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unless we get a response soon, I'm inclined to delete all of the lexemes as nonsense. Their items make a little more sense, but fail to establish notability. Bovlb (talk) 00:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do. Apparently my block only applies to items and they are still creating new lexemes — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lexemes deleted and block extended to cover that namespace. Bovlb (talk) 16:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I note that they appear to be a member of the Tyap Wikimedians User Group, and they may be making these edits as part of a WMF-funded program. Bovlb (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MSGJ, Bovlb: It appears that the user has taken notice of the block. Mahir256 (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed contributions from some other participants in this datathon. I found a lot of items that had no indication of notability, several empty items, and a number of duplicate items. There's also a lot of lexemes, but I'm not really qualified to judge them. It looks like this program did not prepare its participants to contribute effectively. Bovlb (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I put a block template on their talk page. Bovlb (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I looked through the contributions of more participants of this event. I see many more new editors leaping straight into mass item creation without a strong grasp on notability, often creating empty items and duplicates. The editors don't seem to be responsive to feedback. I wish there was a way to ensure that such organized events started off with training that emphasized the importance of these points. Bovlb (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is rather concerning. I am pinging a few editors who are identified as "key people" of the user group: @Valtino44, @Friday musa, @Bello Lydia, @Zbobai — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many of them seem to be using mobile interfaces, so en:WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU may be in play. Bovlb (talk) 17:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like this one is set to disappear with no response. I for one am getting a little tired of these externally-imposed WMF-funded programs that result in bulk item creation with inadequate training, no respect for local policies and norms, and a failure to engage with the community. Is it time for us to consider something akin to en:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(WMF)/Archive_6#RfC_to_issue_a_non-binding_resolution_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation? Bovlb (talk) 03:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q292585

Temp semi protection, ip vandalism. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done semi-protected, and also blocked a couple of IP ranges. Bovlb (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bovlb: in similar cases, I would semi-protect at least three days. I usually will protect longer, otherwise it is too likely that the vandal even doesn't noticed (lets say one day protection) that item was protected, and vandal will repeat his actions Estopedist1 (talk) 07:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add new article to Wikidata

Dear moderators, I’m a student of art and design from University of North Dakota, Department of Art & Design, So I was assigned to work in search of information about Noah D'castellano Italian American actor-model, businessperson now fashionista, young guy who attended New York Fashion Week 2022, I do found information but not as verifiable as Wikipedia or Wikidata, Can you create a page for him? Or can ordinary people like me create it? I look forward to your response. 2600:1000:B10C:1CB4:8D5E:1B15:9AC1:2172 07:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do note that an previous attempt failed in August. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh,understandable,Thanks for your attention though, but you’re re also an administrator, right?. According to the rules you guys has the right to create a new page, and of course now I already realized that someone else proposed the page for its creation, but at that time maybe there weren’t t enough resources as now, there are already articles in magazines and news like this: [1]https://www.lavanguardia.com/peliculas-series/personas/noah-d-castellano-4910471
“So can I create it? I just need help to be able to do it. 2600:1000:B10C:1CB4:8D5E:1B15:9AC1:2172 09:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Item created 6 times (2 times by this user) and deleted by different admins.
Source is unreliable from the moment it mentions that profession is actress (feminine noun). Madamebiblio (talk) 15:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relevant items: Q126736508 (68.192.41.175), Q126369809 (68.192.41.175), Q130360573 (Imjuswannahelp), Q127432586 (68.192.41.175), Q128792500 (Imjuswannahelp). Bovlb (talk) 17:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is intended to be an undeletion request, then you should start with Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion. Bovlb (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks guys specially Bovlb y’all so respectful and supportive. I will try if that works ok if not, ok too, I was just trying to make something clear, or implement as an important page about this young guy that should be included in the Wikidata for people like me who need help and support for future research. 2600:1000:B10C:1CB4:6DE0:14A:8AB:2808 06:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Tokares

Tokares (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism-only account. See [2], [3], and [4]. XReport ―Chó Vàng Hài Hước (talk) 06:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? Of course, it looks controversial if someone is saying that LGBTQ is a sexual deviation, and there may be signs of an edit-war in Q17884. But I can not say that the user's contribution is completely vandal. --Wolverène (talk) 08:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty much. This account is likely a sock puppet, see w:vi:Wikipedia:Rối phá hoại dai dẳng/MiG29VN. Chó Vàng Hài Hước (talk) 16:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Languages

How I can add languages on my User Page? WikiEditPS (talk) 08:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikidata:Userboxes#Babel. --Wolverène (talk) 08:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for undeletion

Dear administrators and contributors of the Wikidata page, due to study topics and an important project of my University of North Dakota, this based on Department of Art & Design, I was assigned a project for which I’m responsible for 7 members, So we were told to work on the young Noah D'castellano who in my portfolio claims to be “Italian American actor-model, businessperson now fashionista” this as his profession and identity.

But more than that we need to look for information on how he started his career, and the most important collaborations that he has had so far, whether brands, fashion shows or films, to all this we already had a finished part but at the time of adding information such as nationality, age, date of birth, we had to resort to wikipedia or other wikis of the same branch, for that reason I went to wikipedia, in which I found important information, but I was not allowed to use it, since this is more in references that D'castellano is being listed for future editions of his official page on Wikipedia, these lists include (Lists of Italian Americans) (2005 in the United States) (List of people from Greenwich, Connecticut) and (In Franco Castellano Wikipedia page as his grandson).

But according to the instructions we have, these lists are not relevant since they are not made specifically for D'castellano, that is more to direct future editors who edit a page on Wikipedia for him. In this way I had to get involved in being able to see how to get a creation of a page for D'castellano but in Wikidata, this to make way for future editions, but according to Madamebiblio an administrator who was very kind in answering me, he told me that the Item has been created 6 times (2 times by a user) and deleted by different admins.

Other very friendly administrator, Bovlb showed me the relevant items, which are: (Q126736508) (Q127432586) (Q12636980) by (68.192.41.175) and (Q130360573), (Q128792500) by Imjuswannahelp.

After this he made me the reference of putting a new topic on "Undeletion request" to which I read all the requirements in Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion That affirm a full recovery of the last page that was created, by (Imjuswannahelp) referring to what I read.

On this occasion according to the administrator Wüstenspringmaus who deleted that previous page (Q130360573), was due to alleged irregularities with the repetition of it, that is, “to be a recreation of deleted a item” which only affects the process of a page on Wikidata, more according to Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion following - "How to request undeletion" in the final part lets us know that “The recreation will be detected, the item will be deleted without substantial review, and associated editors will be warned or blocked”.

In this way I obstructed creating a new page, since I had previously asked the same question in the panel I don’t want to get blocked either. “I know that the administrators are doing their job and that is very important, and they are thanked too much”, but it is also important to see how we can contribute in being able to return Noah D'castellano's page, he is selective to have this opportunity, since he is important in the field that I study, and maybe for other fields too, of which the database is already, just like I showed you the lists where he is in Wikipedia, on the other hand there are already several articles about him, the most efficient would be the (La Vanguardia) but maybe at the time of put the gender they were wrong, but in such a way the date of birth and nationality are clear.

In this way I presented the articles based only on the biography of D'castellano below: (IMDB) (Geni.com) (e-TALENTA) (IdolWiki) (EverybodyWiki / In English, Spanish, Italian) (Timenote) (Ask Oracle) (The Movie Database) (PeoplePill) and (Urban Dictionary).

Otherwise we have the articles of magazines such as (Bold Journey Magazine) where he collaborated for Salvatore Ferragamo autumn edition, we also have (Shoutout La Magazine) where he precept his work in collaboration with Vogue, in the New York Fashion Week 2022, of which the article is already and also as a documentary in (IMDB) also in (The streamable) we can see the article. This project for him was the first and most important, but he has attended the last 3 consecutive years including this year, we also have the same article made by Thompson Smith writer, in Medium magazine, in the same magazine we have Karen Johnson News who published an article about the career of Noah D'castellano under the collaboration with British GQ Magazine. On the other hand we have the article of (CanvasRebel Magazine) where he presents his current activities and upcoming projects, so far everything is very verifiable.

Now in such a way we follow the recommendations of Wikidata:Notability where it clarifies that the page of the person or other entity to be issued in Wikidata, It contains at least one valid sitelink, But this time an Page is available in Wikiquote, of which I’m very happy for, in such a way to give this as finished, I only hope for the best solidarity of the user collaborators and administrators and also other third parties like me, in being able to return the page assigned to Noah D'castellano, I’m an adult and I know that it is necessary since many young people who need the information can have it most readily accessible.

But not they can be verified at the time of handing over their projects since it’s not a specific true valid site like Wikipedia or Wikidata, as happened in our case we are 7 members and we have not yet completed the project for this reason, I know it sounds wrong but that is the reality. And thank to y’all and I look forward to a prompt response.

2600:1000:B10C:1CB4:6DE0:14A:8AB:2808 10:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Undelete These identifiers are weak (social/self-authored) and the references are puff-piece interviews, but I think there's enough here for the item to meet N2. I also found [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10]. I also found wikiquote:Noah D'castellano, currently under deletion discussion. Bovlb (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Omagol

Omagol (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: in Q131349149 I have serious concerns about the quality of the data added, especially links to other projects. They seem to be totally false, unrelated to the topic. This editor has been creating oddities on Commons and on Wikisource, too ―Timtrent (talk) 15:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

single created item is waiting to be deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Estopedist1 Thank you for the response. I am not totally familiar with processes here. Does that flag the item formally somehow as awaiting deletion? Or is it sufficient that you are an admin here and have noted it? If it needs flagging I am not sure of the process, and will need guidance, please. The person the item describes has been created on enWiki as (self?) promotion, and has been scattered over several WMF sites. Timtrent (talk) 08:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User Albedo writes country name with a small letter

Hi,
When @Albedo adds Ukranian descriptions of items, they write "росії" (meaning Russia) from a small letter, like here. After I wrote to the user, they continue (see, for example, [11], [12], or [13]).
Can something be done with this situation? Michgrig (talk) 19:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, blocked for a week. Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:2400:4152:B41:4500:E155:5B78:3844:6439

2400:4152:B41:4500:E155:5B78:3844:6439 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism ―Afaz (talk) 02:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

range-blocked, but edits are not patrolled Estopedist1 (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:193.54.27.129

193.54.27.129 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ✓ Done I blocked the /24 for LTA. There seemed to be ok contributions in the /16 so I went with a narrow block this time. Feel free to adjust the block netmask if you have reason to believe if is insufficient or otherwise. Infrastruktur (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Stage amd

Stage amd (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: IP hopping disruptive editor that I have previously reported (Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2024/08#Disruptive editing and Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2024/11#User:125.204.92.240 and other IPs) is now back with an account making the exact same high-volume, disruptive edits. Their edits for now mostly consist of making items for non-existent disambiguation pages, making incorrect changes to Japanese labels, disruptively moving or removing properties and sitelinks, and moving commons categories and links to different items for no discernable reason. This editor has never communicated, nor have they ever acknowledged my reversions of their edits or the previous two times I reported them here. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC) ―Xezbeth (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Estopedist1 I notice that you recently blocked Special:Contributions/2400:4152:B41:4500:0:0:0:0/64. I was wondering why they would suddenly use an account. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Xezbeth They appear to making a mixture of good edits and some that are likely bad, and you appear to be reverting them wholesale. Can you please explain that? Also, please give a link to where you have tried to communicate with them, as I can't seem to find it. Thanks, Bovlb (talk) 05:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has been going on for months with thousands of edits across dozens of IPs, I have said in both previous reports that some of their edits were ok. I am now less inclined to care about preserving their edits as cleaning up after them is a massive waste of my time. See User_talk:125.204.92.240 for one vain attempt at communicating. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disruption continues on their main account and now 114.184.210.173 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) as well. —Xezbeth (talk) 15:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another 100+ edits, most of which need reverting. I'm just going to leave them to it. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disruption ramping up, continuing on logged in account and now also 118.18.190.19 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)). Why is nothing happening? This isn't even ambiguous disruption, it's a pain to clean up. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Haubi F

Haubi F (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. „Systempartei“ and „Linksextremistisch“ in German are pejorative terms. For the parties edited by the user – at least judging from the linked German Wikipedia articles – there's no basis for such changes, especially not for reintroducing them after having been reverted. --Nw520 (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

user is warned Estopedist1 (talk) 09:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and continues Ankermast (talk) 12:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Blocked 1 week. --Lymantria (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Wikintell

Wikintell (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: New account, only edits are vandalism. XReport ―William Graham (talk) 04:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

user is warned Estopedist1 (talk) 09:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Leonardnbbs

Leonardnbbs (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: New account, only edits are vandalism. XReport ―William Graham (talk) 04:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

user is warned Estopedist1 (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Surya maket

Surya maket (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: old spammer, its "works" discovered/{reverted,fixed} only recently though ―Mykhal (talk) 10:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Indeffed. Bovlb (talk) 17:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

change URL for Squash Info player ID (P3286)

Hi, URL has changed for Squash Info player ID (P3286) (Squash Info ID )and is now https://www.squashinfo.com/player/$1 instead http://www.squashinfo.com/player/$1

Change is done but does not work

Any help ?

thanks

Jmax (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the formatter URL (P1630) to https://squashinfo.com/player/$1; the site no longer seems to respond with "www" in the URL. It may take some time for WD to process things but it should (hopefully) work shortly. — Huntster (t @ c)

Report concerning User:Maidana Lopes

Maidana Lopes (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―XXBlackburnXx (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Blocked for 3 months and warned. --Wolverène (talk) 07:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GratarGratar

User:GratarGratar is edit-warring at Q5021363. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tgeorgescu is supporting a claim the person within the article (Călin Georgescu) didn't made. On contrary, he clearly says he's an ORTHODOX (on his youtube channel 18:27, being together with his wife, she says "Religia noastră creștin-ortodoxă" - engl. "Our orthodox faith...").
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lctvzaN7j1s&ab_channel=C%C4%83linGeorgescu-CanalulOficial
I propose Tgeorgescu to be blocked from further editing the article. Thanks. GratarGratar (talk) 22:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would understand it if the mainstream media just spilled the beans about Georgescu's secret religious allegiance. But his public declarations are rife with New Age ideology. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you have no respect for reliable sources, don't expect to last long at this project. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
E.g., most members of the Anthroposophical Society from Romania self-identify as Eastern-Orthodox. In fact, they believe in reincarnation and that God consists of seven Elohim. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:56, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have cited 5 (five) different media outlets which all confirm he is a New Age Christian. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So: who are going the admins to believe? Me? Not! You? Not! They are going to believe reliable sources. That's how the whole Wikimedia system operates: based upon reliable sources. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do note that I have absolutely no objection to also stating that he self-identifies as Eastern-Orthodox. Both should be stated: his self-identification as Eastern-Orthodox, and that he is a New Age believer according to several journalists and professors. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those would be 7 or 8 journalists and 3 professors. The genie is out of the bottle, you cannot put it back. Tgeorgescu (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be more clear: subjective identification does matter. But objective identification also matters. It is ridiculous to say that only the subjective identification should be believed, while the objective identification should be rejected. See w:emic and etic. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a living person. We have policies on this. Per en.wp and other Wikipedia wikis, "Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief (or lack of such) or orientation in question," and "These principles apply equally to lists, navigation templates, and {{Infobox}} statements". Wikidata statements are mostly used on Wikipedia as infobox statements. As such, we have our own Wikidata:Living people policy, where religion or worldview (P140) is listed among Wikidata properties that may violate privacy. So please exercise care: do not add religions that are not accepted by the person in question. If religious leaders and/or scholars question their allegiance to the religion that the person declared, then there is the deprecated rank that can be applied to the statement.
I'm not saying that in this case we should do that. I think the best way to go is to not specify anything there.
Yes, subjective identification is key to someone's identity and identity should be respected.  —Andreitalk 08:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I still have to figure out how stating that he is New Age is offensive, but allegations of bribery and corruption aren't. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One thing is about what you are, the other is about what you do.  —Andreitalk 14:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrei Stroe: May I suggest changing the removal into a deprecated rank statement? It has the same effect. We don't normally remove statements with reasonable sources. The statement can also get a "statement is disputed by" (subject) qualifier to make it clear. Infrastruktur (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrastruktur true, this works.  —Andreitalk 14:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Isaguapo

Isaguapo (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 07:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Left the standard welcome, deleted spamm-y user page. I hope that's enough.

Report concerning User:AMOS KUNKIOH MAGWA

AMOS KUNKIOH MAGWA (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 07:54, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Left the standard welcome, deleted spamm-y user page. I hope that's enough.

Report concerning User:Mossen Artist

Mossen Artist (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 07:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done deleted and warned. I hope that's enough again.

Report concerning User:Lil BDA

Lil BDA (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 08:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Left the standard welcome, deleted spamm-y user page. I hope that's enough.

Report concerning User:240F:7A:DD40:1:0:0:0:0/64

240F:7A:DD40:1:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Controversial editing about living people. ―Kokage si (talk) 09:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Range-blocked for three months Estopedist1 (talk) 10:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request for Q1229663

Please semi-protect Q1229663. Reason: Frequent target for vandalism. Please protect. XReport --William Graham (talk) 17:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done 1 month semi. --Lymantria (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BLP concern - privacy violation

Please speedy delete Q106957769 BLOPvio (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BLOPvio appears to a LTA whose most recently locked account was User:Jeh Cyrus Vandrevala Q106957769. That account blanked Q106957769 and then BLOPvio nominated it for deletion. William Graham (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:William Graham

William Graham (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) BLP violation - on purpose. [14] BLOPvio (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Ntulibsys

Ntulibsys (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―Cookai1205 (talk) 03:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike that bad faith vandalism, because the user says "National Taiwan University Library Wikidata account". However, Chinese-language specific. Could you help @S8321414? Estopedist1 (talk) 07:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is more like editing dispute for me, not pure vandalism. I will suggest WD:PC for this case.--S8321414 (talk) 08:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:78.131.244.18

78.131.244.18 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: LTA Matlin; see diff/2283320596 and diff/2283321460. ―Dcflyer (talk) 08:13, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done 3 months block. Thanks for bringing this up here. --Lymantria (talk) 10:58, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:210.170.160.9

210.170.160.9 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Controversial editing about living people. ―Kokage si (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Blocked for 1 year.--S8321414 (talk) 12:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=2283408881"