Wikidata:Property proposal/Australian Fungi ID

Australian Fungi ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

   Done: Australian Fungi ID (P9076) (Talk and documentation)

Description	identifier for a taxon (a fungus), in the Australian 'Fungi' database
Data type	External identifier
Template parameter	To be added to en:Template:Taxonbar (and equivalents in up to 27 Wikipedias),
Domain	fungal taxa
Allowed values	[1-9]\d*
Example	Absidia (Q4386113) → 60015778 Abrothallus (Q4669602) → 60014141 Abrothallus parmeliarum (Q10398085) → 60018871 Thraustochytriida (Q25365893) → 60013155 Absidia spinosa (Q10398125) → 60032593
Source	https://fungi.biodiversity.org.au/nsl/services/
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Planned use	Help identify Australian fungal taxa. Add external ids via open refine. And use this database to add authorities and publication dates to fungi
Number of IDs in source	approximately 20 000 ids
Expected completeness	eventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URL	https://id.biodiversity.org.au/name/fungi/$1
See also	Property:P3130

Motivation

Australian database, supported by Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (Q61802805). This will allow identification of fungi, both naturalised and native, found in Australia. And it will also allow easy naming of taxon authorities, and year of publication as qualifiers for the taxon name for these fungi. MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Thierry Caro 99of9 Canley Mattinbgn Samwilson JarrahTree ScottDavis Oronsay Pru.mitchell Bidgee Harryboyles Dhx1 SJK Nickw25 Danadl MargaretRDonald Nicolekearney Calistemon Eothan Evolution and evolvability REMerrick Atroche The-Pope Bjenks hfordsa SHB2000 AmandaSLawrence Chris.sherlock3

Notified participants of WikiProject Australia

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.

• @Pigsonthewing:.
• @Thierry Caro:
• @Ambrosia10:

Discussion

• Do you know their rationale for what gets a name and what gets an instance? --99of9 (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
• No. (I had thought it might be species vs genera but that is not the case that I can see.) The database is completely downloadable so the name variants would not be an issue in uploadng IDs. MargaretRDonald (talk) 02:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
  • @99of9: There can be a single form and I have now corrected the proposal. (Very strange, but the proposal is now correct) MargaretRDonald (talk) 08:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
    •  Support thanks, this looks nicer. --99of9 (talk) 02:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. YULdigitalpreservation (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. Nickw25 (talk) 08:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. Oronsay (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. JarrahTree (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Dhx1 (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
• @99of9, Pintoch: Is this sufficient support for this to happen? Who should I notify? MargaretRDonald (talk) 14:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
  • WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. There are just 1073 taxon names in the fungi kingdom which are wikidata items and just 600 enwiki articles. It would be good to get a move on with this proposal and the lichen id proposal, as both these databases are entirely downloadable and immediately the properties are created, I hope to get the majority of the these ids and their corresponding wikidata items up. MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

---

•  Done @MargaretRDonald, 99of9, YULdigitalpreservation, Nickw25, JarrahTree, Dhx1: Australian Fungi ID (P9076). ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
  • @1997kB: Thnaks so much for this. MargaretRDonald (talk) 18:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)