Wikidata:Property proposal/Homosaurus ID (V3)

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Homosaurus ID (V3)

[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Descriptionidentifier for an authorized term in version 3 of Homosaurus: An International LGBTQ+ Linked Data Vocabulary
RepresentsHomosaurus (Q26936735)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainitem
Allowed valueshomoit[0-9]{7}
Example 1ageplay (Q392963)homoit0000022
Example 2asexuality (Q724351)homoit0000004
Example 3bisexual comic (Q109964663)homoit0001589
Example 4drag king (Q1254525)homoit0000373
Example 5gaydar (Q40246)homoit0000559
Example 6lesbian fiction (Q109581585)homoit0000742
Example 7tumtum (Q7852710)homoit0001477
Example 8transgender studies (Q17014367)homoit0001447
Sourcehttps://homosaurus.org/v3
Planned useWill add to new items or to items being edited
Number of IDs in source1770 (as of December 6, 2021)
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URLhttps://homosaurus.org/v3/$1
See alsoHomosaurus ID (V2) (P6417)
Applicable "stated in"-valueHomosaurus (Q26936735)

Motivation

[edit]

Version 3 of Homosaurus was released in September 2021. This initial version is the same as Homosaurus V2 but uses a more standard identifier sequence. To migrate from Homosaurus V2, there is a "replacedBy" field that points to equivalent Homosaurus V3 term. The Homosaurus V3 term added a "replaces" field that points to the Homosaurus V2 term. The Homosaurus V2 can still be accessed at https://homosaurus.org/v2. Since both versions 2 and 3 are available, a new property is needed for version 3, as the identifiers are different. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 03:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
@UWashPrincipalCataloger, Gkuriger, Sheilatb, Sandrileine, Clements.UWLib, Emwille: @Riesengrey, Khanselman, Skvader, Cdezelar, Sillitti E., Uomovariabile: @Germartin1, SilentSpike: ✓ Done Homosaurus ID (V3) (P10192) Pamputt (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pamputt: I assume this should not apply to the Lexeme space then? (Apologies, it's the area I'm least familiar with so useful to know when reviewing future proposals) SilentSpike (talk) 12:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SilentSpike: I think it should not since the items are about concept while lexemes are about words. So for example transgender studies (Q17014367) is clearly not a lexeme. Pamputt (talk) 12:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]