Wikidata:Property proposal/Number of recoveries

number of recoveries

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person

Done: number of recoveries (P8010) (Talk and documentation)

Description	The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_outbreak_in_France#Statistics has a table with : Number of cases Number of deaths Number of recoveries I have Property for cases and deaths but not for recoveries. I can use Q87143769 ?
Data type	Number (not available yet)
Domain	Wikidata:Property proposal/number of recoveries
Allowed values	Non-negative integers (^\d)
Example 1	2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes (Q87143769) → 0
Example 2	COVID-19 pandemic in Austria (Q86847911) → 4 (add Qualifier point in time (P585) → 2020-03-10)
Example 3	COVID-19 pandemic in Italy (Q84104992) → 1 (add Qualifier point in time (P585) → 2020-02-24)
Example 4	COVID-19 pandemic in Italy (Q84104992) → 3 (add Qualifier point in time (P585) → 2020-02-26)
Example 5	COVID-19 pandemic in Austria (Q86847911) → 2 (add Qualifier point in time (P585) → 2020-03-08)
Source	you should provide 3 examples at least-->
See also	number of cases (P1603), number of deaths (P1120), Wikidata:Property proposal/number of clinical tests

Motivation

 Viruscorona2020 (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Support why not? ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose When it comes to the actual data, a high resultion with daily values seems important. Wikidata is no good place to store data with daily resolution. I would prefer to use tabular data. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 19:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- There is only a limited number of days in a year, so items could hold that. Do we have a working sample of similar tables at Commons (tables where only individual datapoints are updated frequently) or is it just an idea for future development of data at Commons (possibly not included in any known development plan)? --- Jura 16:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @ ChristianKl : since the beginning of the epidemic, there have not been recoveries every day: there are days with and days without.--Viruscorona2020 (talk) 23:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support apparently the alternative would need to be developed first --- Jura 11:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note additional supporters for this on Wikidata:Property proposal/number of recoveries (withdrawn in favor of this proposal). ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support
- Comment unfortunately i placed an identical proposal here Wikidata:Property proposal/number of recoveries - i have withdrawn it already and include the list of supporting Users below: (--Mfchris84 (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Support Dhx1 (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also support. Do you know if there is a way to enforce that this statements should only be added with a reference qualifier? TiagoLubiana (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TiagoLubiana: do you mean property constraint (P2302) with citation-needed constraint (Q54554025)

Maybe, but it seems a little different of what I was thinking. I am not super familiarized with restriction types. It would just be that the statement requires a reference. It is likely my fail, but I was not able to find it in the classes listed in property constraint (P2302). TiagoLubiana (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TiagoLubiana: sorry it should be the following constraint: citation-needed constraint (Q54554025) (corrected it above) Mfchris84 (talk) 17:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mfchris84: Yes, perfect! TiagoLubiana (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mfchris84, Viruscorona2020: The same proposal was also made recently here Wikidata:Property proposal/Number of recoveries - can you merge this proposal with that one (which has already been marked as ready)? ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Jura1: --Viruscorona2020 (talk) 19:17, 17 March 2020 (
Done please make good use of it.