Wikidata:Property proposal/quality has state
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
quality has state
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Withdrawn
| Description | specific state of a quality. For example, "clean" is a state of the quality "cleanliness" |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | quality (Q1207505) |
| Allowed values | state (Q3505845) |
| Example 1 | magnitude (Q2091629) → maximum (Q10578722), minimum (Q10585806) |
| Example 2 | cleanliness (Q692096) → clean (Q107998880), dirty (Q107998873) |
| Example 3 | orderliness (Q107273991) → order (Q12893838), chaos (Q1787424) |
Motivation
[edit]We do not have a way to relate qualities that can have a range of states with the common states that are possible with them. Lectrician1 (talk) 00:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
Comment While I can see the issue here, do you have a good guess as to how many statements this would actually be relevant or useful for? And I wonder if the relation would be better in the other direction anyway. And maybe facet of (P1269) suffices for that (not that it's been used that way so far)? ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with @ArthurPSmith that it would make more sense to have the property in the other direction and thus
Oppose. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 06:29, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with @ArthurPSmith that it would make more sense to have the property in the other direction and thus
Support, an important property for connectivity.--Arbnos (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Withdrawing. This is a weird proposal. Lectrician1 (talk) 04:25, 18 December 2022 (UTC)