User talk:Aritonoko

Welcome!

Hi Aritonoko! I noticed your contributions to Life Education Australia and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edits to the above page were helpful, but the content is so promotional that it's better off deleted. Welcome to Wikipedia! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AirshipJungleman29thank you very much! Thats so kind from you! If you find the time, please take a look at what I am doing to correct me if I am inaccurate or do something wrong. I am very new and want to contribute to the wiki society! Aritonoko (talk) 12:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic pants

Thanks for your effort to improve Plastic pants, but in this edit you replaced one citation needed template with the plain text "[citation needed]" and removed another one. You might like to read Help:A quick guide to templates if you don't understand how templates work. Maintenance templates should only be removed if and when the issue they flag up has been resolved. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, thank you very much! I didnt know that... will read the guide man, thanks again !:) Aritonoko (talk) 07:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you also replaced a unit conversion template with plain text in this edit. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cordless LarryI have taken note of your advice and will make sure to familiarize myself with the use of templates, particularly regarding maintenance templates. I appreciate your guidance and will be more cautious in my future edits to ensure compliance with Wikipedia guidelines.

Once again, thank you for pointing out my oversight, and I'm grateful for your understanding and support. Aritonoko (talk) 08:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hi, quick note to say I have reverted your change to Oasis Academy Enfield starting "These changes in leadership are a natural part of the school's development ... ". This reads like opinion - you'd need a reliable source saying that. Though I don't think the article as it is reads as if the changes in heads are indicative of a problem - it reads like a neutral list of heads to me. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 09:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tacyarg Thank you for reaching out. I understand your concern regarding the change to the Oasis Academy Enfield article. I apologize if it came across as opinionated. Your point about needing a reliable source to support such statements is valid.

The intention was to maintain a neutral tone in the article and present the list of heads without implying any issues. I appreciate your feedback, and I will ensure that any future edits adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Aritonoko (talk) 07:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Peclers, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Hello, I noticed you contributions to the article Peclers where you added The revised text adheres to Wikipedia guidelines by presenting factual information without using promotional language. It provides a concise and objective overview of Peclers' services and its affiliation with WPP plc. to the article lead. Editors should not add their personal opinions to articles even if their intention is to improve the article. Netherzone (talk) 14:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Netherzone,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I apologize for any inadvertent inclusion of original research in my recent edit to the Peclers article. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Moving forward, I will make sure to cite reliable sources for all my contributions and avoid any personal opinions in the articles. I appreciate the reminder and will strive to maintain the accuracy and neutrality of my edits.

Thank you for your dedication to upholding the quality of Wikipedia's content.

Best regards, Aritonoko (talk) 07:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Richard McLean (Australia). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. I know you made these edits in good faith, but you made this article more promotional rather than less. You also added unsourced content to a WP:BLP that was already poorly sourced. Without a reference backing up the claims that were added, it may again be original research. If you are uncertain about an edit, you can always ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. I'll go ahead clean up the unsourced content, in the future any claims added to a BLP must be accompanied by a citation (reference) backing up that claim. Netherzone (talk) 14:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much again! Aritonoko (talk) 07:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]