User talk:Cordless Larry
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
Welcome!
Hello, Cordless Larry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Djegan 12:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Human Rights
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Re:Merging articles
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Pending changes
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
To help you keep up the good work
[edit]/* September 2019 */
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nova
[edit]this source hardly can be seen as a statement in a peer reviewed journal. among others it uses a wrong photo, which you can easily check on google maps and google street view. vanity press? nova never charged any author a penny. in google scholar and scopus and wos you simply don‘t have any negative article on nova‘s performance. the „librarians“ are just two persons. full stop
https://web.archive.org/web/20161108155756/https://scholarlyoa.com/2015/05/26/watch-out-for-publishers-with-nova-in-their-name/ Frete unicolore (talk) 09:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- The claim that precisely two librarians have criticised Nova would need a source confirming that number, which is why I removed it. Anyway, the place to discuss this is on the article's talk page, not here. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:16, 25 December 2024 (UTC)