User contributions for 195.132.53.109

13 October 2019

• 02:1102:11, 13 October 2019 diff hist +726 Aftonbladet →History and profile: reason for name changes
• 01:5401:54, 13 October 2019 diff hist +79 Aftonbladet →History and profile

6 October 2019

• 02:2102:21, 6 October 2019 diff hist +942 Expressen added political background during ww2 & list of eds in chief
• 02:0902:09, 6 October 2019 diff hist +2 Metro (Swedish newspaper) changed is to was
• 02:0702:07, 6 October 2019 diff hist +608 Metro (Swedish newspaper) →History and profile: adding that it has closed down
• 02:0102:01, 6 October 2019 diff hist +156 Svenska Dagbladet →History and profile
• 01:5801:58, 6 October 2019 diff hist +9 Dagens Nyheter No edit summary
• 01:4801:48, 6 October 2019 diff hist +367 Eskilstuna-Kuriren →Resubmitting expanded article after it was rejected due to a lack of sources. There were already several sources, but I have now added more and tried to format them the Wikipedia way. I am not sure if it is correctly formated, but please fix the errors instead of simply rejecting the article.: new section
• 01:4701:47, 6 October 2019 diff hist +9,427 Eskilstuna-Kuriren No edit summary

3 October 2019

• 23:4923:49, 3 October 2019 diff hist −1,223 Aftonbladet i condensed the disproportionately long criticism section, which smacked of activist editing, and moved it into the text. These controversies deserve mention, but they are hardly major issues in an article about the paper as a whole. They also conflated the newspaper as such with the cultural section, which is a mixture of op-eds and cultural material. This criticism (about alleged anti-Semitic or pro-Russia publications) was always about Linderborg's cultural section, not the rest of the paper.
• 23:3223:32, 3 October 2019 diff hist −1,372 Expressen Removed an unduly long section on a short-lived brouhaha about a columnist years ago. This is not a live conflict, and one would be hard pressed to find anyone who recalls it in Sweden today. Wikipedia should not present it as a widely known or defining characteristic of the paper. There is certainly no shortage of criticism against Expressen, but there are numerous more significant and substantial examples of debates about the paper that could, if need be, be worked into the main body of the... Tags: section blanking Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 23:2523:25, 3 October 2019 diff hist +66 Eskilstuna-Kuriren No edit summary
• 23:2423:24, 3 October 2019 diff hist +590 Eskilstuna-Kuriren expanded and corrected some errors
• 23:1523:15, 3 October 2019 diff hist +2,121 N Eskilstuna-Kuriren Created an article using Swedish Wikipedia and Swedish-language articles Tag: Visual edit: Switched