User contributions for 2A02:C7F:A025:2500:B910:998C:D451:37A0
Appearance
Results for 2A02:C7F:A025:2500:B910:998C:D451:37A0 talk block log logs global block log filter log
22 September 2018
- 21:0721:07, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860756041 by General Ization (talk)Reverting edit made without the due explanation required by Wikipedia Tag: Undo
- 20:4920:49, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860755049 by General Ization (talk)Making a legitimate edit is not the start of an edit war. Certain others started and continue to wage an edit war. Tag: Undo
- 20:2420:24, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860752183 by Mediatech492 (talk)If this edit is put to discussion on the talk page then a small group of like-minded people can overrule it. As has already been made clear, the edit is factual, accurate and well-sourced, and there is no need for discussion within the terms of Wikipedia. Tag: Undo
- 20:1120:11, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860750914 by Mediatech492 (talk)Quoting the Oxford English Dictionary entirely within the spirit of Wikipedia. Tag: Undo
- 20:0020:00, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860749923 by Mediatech492 (talk)`That's what you say, but you're asserting POV outside Wikipedia basic principles. Tag: Undo
- 19:5219:52, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860748652 by Mediatech492 (talk)Whose consensus, and why? Tag: Undo
- 19:3919:39, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860747266 by Mediatech492 (talk)Whose consensus, and why? Tag: Undo
- 19:2319:23, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers Undid revision 860745093 by Mediatech492 (talk)Why not? It's a legitimate edit. You do not own this article. You do not own Wilkipedia. You do not own history. You do not own public access to knowledge. Tag: Undo
- 16:0816:08, 22 September 2018 diff hist +524 Quakers The case for this edit has been made adequately in the edit summaries, but no reasonable case against has ever been put forward, so why not allow core Wikipedia principles to prevail and leave it?