User contributions for Bpq

9 November 2012

• 17:5217:52, 9 November 2012 diff hist +2 Microsemi No edit summary
• 17:5117:51, 9 November 2012 diff hist −20 m Microsemi Updated financial information to reflect the company's Q4/Fiscal Year 2012 earnings, which were reported on 11/8/12 after market close.

9 October 2012

• 17:3417:34, 9 October 2012 diff hist 0 m Microsemi →Worldwide operations: Capitalized "Operations" for format consistency
• 17:3317:33, 9 October 2012 diff hist +13 m Microsemi →ASIC backdoor claims: Capitalized header and added "and disputes" to fully summarize the section's content accurately
• 17:1717:17, 9 October 2012 diff hist +490 N User:Bpq/sandbox ←Created page with '{{User sandbox}} <!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> I'm an employee of Microsemi Corporation and try to regularly update the page with updated information as we conti...'
• 17:0917:09, 9 October 2012 diff hist −16 m Microsemi Updated markets Microsemi serves
• 17:0617:06, 9 October 2012 diff hist −12 m Microsemi →ASIC backdoor claims: Corrected per the referenced article from ZD: "Skorobogatov did not use the military-grade chips, as he originally claimed."
• 17:0017:00, 9 October 2012 diff hist +3 m Microsemi Fixed...had my copy in with reference information. oops!
• 16:5616:56, 9 October 2012 diff hist +1,343 Microsemi provided more up-to-date reports on the backdoor issue and provided additional references for clarification and accuracy
• 16:3016:30, 9 October 2012 diff hist −958 Microsemi Claims are disputed in these newer articles, showing there is no "backdoor." http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/01/silicon_backdoor_rebutted/ and http://www.zdnet.com/microsemi-denies-it-put-a-backdoor-in-chips-1339338961/
• 15:5615:56, 9 October 2012 diff hist +1,274 User talk:Daniel J. Leivick →Microsemi: new section
• 15:4815:48, 9 October 2012 diff hist −958 Microsemi Undid revision 516829256 by Daniel J. Leivick (talk) Not a matter of denying...explained/clarified why it's FALSE. Plus, there is no reference cited.
• 15:4015:40, 9 October 2012 diff hist +24 m Microsemi →Worldwide operations: Your source was from 2008 and is outdated. Updated with correct manufacturing facilities. http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/MSCC/1292561629x0x532553/E720D7EF-90B7-4143-928E-56ECB55A994E/Microsemi_AR_12-14-11_SECURED.pdf
• 15:2315:23, 9 October 2012 diff hist +6 Talk:Microsemi →Edit war with Microsemi
• 15:2315:23, 9 October 2012 diff hist +119 Talk:Microsemi →Edit war with Microsemi
• 15:0715:07, 9 October 2012 diff hist −958 Microsemi Removed--incorrect. Co's test interface is always disabled in practice; can be disabled several ways such as “permanent lock” mode. The media references don’t mention that it couldn’t be disabled.
• 15:0015:00, 9 October 2012 diff hist −14 m Microsemi →ASIC backdoor claims: Please provide documentation of where these are built. Their origin is not publicly available. Any claims must be referenced.
• 14:5814:58, 9 October 2012 diff hist +90 m Microsemi Added reference
• 14:5614:56, 9 October 2012 diff hist +90 m Microsemi Added reference
• 14:5214:52, 9 October 2012 diff hist +1,649 Microsemi Undid revision 516795853 by Qworty (talk) This is widely reported, including on the Irish Times site: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0808/1224321715211.html

8 October 2012

• 22:3622:36, 8 October 2012 diff hist +2 Microsemi →ASIC backdoor claims: These products are used primarily in aerospace applications, not defense.
• 22:3122:31, 8 October 2012 diff hist −5 Microsemi →ASIC backdoor claims: The products are made in Taiwan, not China. In addition, the Actel name was legally changed to Microsemi in 2012.
• 22:2822:28, 8 October 2012 diff hist +7 Microsemi No edit summary
• 22:2222:22, 8 October 2012 diff hist +1,520 Microsemi Added information about the company's European headquarters and historical presence in that region
• 22:1222:12, 8 October 2012 diff hist +669 Microsemi Added information about the company's role in the Mars rover mission of 2012
• 22:0322:03, 8 October 2012 diff hist +3 Microsemi Made grammatical correction to "foregoed" and fixed incorrect information that James Peterson had posted his credentials on the Microsemi website and Microsemi filings. It was only included with his STET board position documents.

11 January 2012

• 18:5518:55, 11 January 2012 diff hist 0 Microsemi No edit summary
• 18:4918:49, 11 January 2012 diff hist −1 Microsemi No edit summary
• 18:4618:46, 11 January 2012 diff hist −33 Microsemi No edit summary
• 18:4118:41, 11 January 2012 diff hist +37 Microsemi Clarified acquisition of Endwave was only defense and security business
• 18:4018:40, 11 January 2012 diff hist −1 Microsemi Switched order of some customers, grammatical corrections
• 18:2618:26, 11 January 2012 diff hist −21 Microsemi Updated to include newly acquired medical products, edited for consistency with acquisition verbiage, updated financials based upon recent annual report

19 October 2011

• 17:1417:14, 19 October 2011 diff hist +87 Microsemi No edit summary
• 17:1217:12, 19 October 2011 diff hist 0 Microsemi No edit summary
• 17:1117:11, 19 October 2011 diff hist −9,529 Zarlink Zarlink Semiconductor no longer exists, as the company was acquired by Microsemi Corporation. Tag: blanking

15 September 2010

• 17:0717:07, 15 September 2010 diff hist −1 Return fraud No edit summary

6 August 2010

• 20:5020:50, 6 August 2010 diff hist +246 Fisher & Phillips No edit summary

19 May 2010

• 14:5414:54, 19 May 2010 diff hist +120 Return fraud →References

1 April 2010

• 21:5521:55, 1 April 2010 diff hist +46 m Product return Removed "blacklisting"--it's not an accurate term, as the consumer may be able to return items in the future. Also corrected inacurrate information on retailers sharing information in the database.

9 July 2009

• 19:5019:50, 9 July 2009 diff hist +60 Waterfield Group corrected external links to internal links and updated parent company name

8 July 2009

• 22:2622:26, 8 July 2009 diff hist +1,016 N Talk:Product return ←Created page with 'There was a recommendation made to merge ‘return fraud’ with ‘returning’ on the site. However, return fraud is a ''huge'' problem, with retailers losing an ...'