Talk:Bloomex

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bloomex article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 23 March 2013, see discussion.
keep, 10 April 2010, see discussion.
keep, 22 May 2009, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Dimitri Lokhonia (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Untrust business

I have ordered on Mar 6 for flower and delivery on Mother's day Mar 9 (3 days ahead). However I did not receive it until 22:45 PM when everyone went on bed and quit waiting for the flowers. I have tried both live chat and call center but has no answer.

Contacted this morning and was informed since it was delivered there will be no refund, not even an apology. Your delivery policy is " Regular Delivery (Next Day) $14.99 Orders will be delivered between 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. for residential addresses, and between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3EA3:2C00:CD20:7274:795D:E008 (talk) 21:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is intended to be used by Wikipedia contributors, to discuss article content. It is not owned or controlled by Bloomex, and nor is it a means to communicate with them. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source?

Beauty School Dropout, rejected an Australian source, named Product Review, I used as an "Unreliable cited source". Given Product Review is the major Australian product review site how might that be unreliable??

🤔🤔 2407:7000:9B74:AF03:9931:7784:6485:A203 (talk) 05:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, whether it is 'reliable' or not seems rather beside the point. The page tells us absolutely nothing about Bloomex, or how their data on reviews compares to any other company offering a similar service. And before anyone asks, no we aren't going to make the comparison ourselves, per Wikipedia:No original research. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AndyTheGrump reading that first para of the link you offer makes it quite clear that Product Review meets the criteria to be used. 2407:7000:9B74:AF03:AD87:7FD3:50C9:6FC6 (talk) 07:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, quite obviously a webpage created by someone else cannot constitute original research by a Wikipedia contributor. That doesn't however mean that material cited such an article is automatically valid for inclusion. So how about actually responding to the first two sentences of my previous post, rather than fishing a red herring from the last? AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]