Talk:Cision Inc.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cision Inc. redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles

Companies Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Merger proposal

I propose that Cision Inc. be merged into Cision. Confusingly, the two articles contain a hat note which indicate that the two entities should not be confused but I believe they are the same company. The first is older than the second; I have no strong opinions on which should be merged into which but I believe we generally do not include "INC." In the title which is why I proposed the order that I listed. See also Talk:Cision#Merger_proposal.--S Philbrick (Talk) 18:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Cision

Article does not make clear the distinction between Cision and Cision Inc. Andrew³²⁷ 11:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Given the significant amounts of overlap (the infoboxes for example effectively cover the same entities), I see no reason that the company should be covered in separate "pre-merger" and "post-merger" articles. Meets WP:OVERLAP. Guliolopez (talk) 09:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]