Talk:Defense pact

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Defense pact article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: National

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

US centric

This redirect is too US centric. Other nations have mutual defense treaties that do not involve the US at all so this should not redirect to a US specific page. TMLutas (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Terms, spelllings

Gbooks hits (-llc, -wikipedia):

"Defense pact" (331)
"Defensive pact" (302)
"Defence pact" (251)
"Defence pacts" (235)
"Defense pacts" (213)

Adding "defensive pact" to the intro.--Zoupan 16:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Difference with List of military alliances

What's the difference between this article and List of military alliances? It seems that article contains alliances (as the name implies), but not exclusively mutual defense agreements, which this article seems to exclusively contain? Discombobulates (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abdinajibadow 154.159.254.85 (talk) 05:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion

This article is not different from List of military alliances, apart from being less complete. I thus propose that it be merged into List of military alliances. Discombobulates (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. It is one of the types of military alliances and it is more than fine to have separate article.178.222.28.51 (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Budapest Memorandum

Does the Budapest Memorandum fall under here? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 10:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]