Talk:Yuri (genre)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 00:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey I will be reviewing this article, though it may take a bit cause its a long article. Link20XX (talk) 00:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
@Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Just a few things before I can promote the article. I have made a few bold edits already.
Checklist
[edit]Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]Lead:
- Link the article on "homoeroticism", as that's a word that is probably not known by the everyday person.
- Done. Morgan695 (talk) 05:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Terminology and etymology:
- In the second paragraph, you shouldn't wikilink "rose", as that's something that most people know.
- I think it's best to keep, as "rose" has several different meanings (the past tense of "rise", a color, a type of wine, etc.). It's useful to explicate that it's in reference to the flower, especially in contrast to "yuri" as "lily".
- Unless I'm missing something, neither Lezhin nor Tappytoon use the term lily in the source provided.
- Removed, as it's not supported by the source, or seemingly any other source. Morgan695 (talk) 05:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
History:
- Reference 35 appears to just redirect to the main site. Is this intentional?
- Repaired the archive link.
- Reference 37 has a "page needed" tag
- Fixed.
That is all. Once they have all been addressed, ping me and I will pass it. Link20XX (talk) 03:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Link20XX: Edits have been implemented. Morgan695 (talk) 05:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: The changes implemented are enough. The result of this review is Pass. Congratulations and nice work! Link20XX (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Link20XX:, Great, thank you! And thank you for your diligence in taking on so many of my GANs. Morgan695 (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: Don't mention it, I was just helping out. Anyway, I hope you nominate a fact from this article now that you can. Link20XX (talk) 06:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Link20XX:, Great, thank you! And thank you for your diligence in taking on so many of my GANs. Morgan695 (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: The changes implemented are enough. The result of this review is Pass. Congratulations and nice work! Link20XX (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)