Template talk:Commercial ditchings

	Transport portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
	This template is supported by the Maritime task force.

Aviation: Accidents

	Aviation portal This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
	This template is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Disaster management

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management

Washington/Potomac

What about the airliner bound for Florida that plunged into the Potomac in the 80's in the middle of winter? 76.66.198.171 (talk) 14:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean Air Florida Flight 90? I think it would probably be good to differentiate between attempted ditchings (rare) to crashes in water (somewhat more common). This seems to fall into the latter, no? Joshdboz (talk) 15:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Is there any particular reason that this template is {{Commercial Ditchings}} instead of {{Commercial ditchings}} with a lowercase "d"? LinguistAtLarge • Msg 21:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. This is fine with lowercase. Joshdboz (talk) 12:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]