User talk:103.116.208.33

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (103.116.208.33) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Bahudhara (talk) 03:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate103.116.208.33 (talk) 03:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Murder allegation

Hi 103.116.208.33, I've reverted you additions to The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, because the murder allegation is only your personal opinion, and is unsupported by the Coroner's findings in the reference supplied. Bahudhara (talk) 03:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, okay.Then why were police there? Obviously some one killed him. Just don't know who.103.116.208.33 (talk) 03:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've also reverted your latest edit, because although rewritten, it still contains unsupported material - the ref doesn't mention police attendance (although that mightn't be unusual), or allegations of murder. Bahudhara (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the police bit then103.116.208.33 (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The incident is already mentioned in Wikipedia, at Steve_Herczeg#Death, in an acceptable manner consistent with Wikipedia policies of verifiability and neutral point of view. Bahudhara (talk) 04:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bahudhara (talk) 04:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hello Kitty (disambiguation) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hello Kitty (disambiguation) was changed by 103.116.208.33 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893227 on 2019-10-08T03:21:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hello Kitty (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Omg, read the damn article first 103.116.208.33 (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 04:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please restrict further usage of this talk page while blocked to an unblock request only. Failure to do so will result in your access to editing this talk page to be revoked. El_C 05:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. El_C 05:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lyell McEwin Hospital, you may be blocked from editing. Sceptre (talk) 14:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Royal Adelaide Hospital. Sceptre (talk) 14:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for the same disruptive edits as before. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And you should learn to assume good faith. Thanks.103.116.208.33 (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Bombay Stock Exchange. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Aranya (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yakub. TheEpTic (talk) 12:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have 3 months to throughly read about our Neutral point of view and Verifiability policies

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Mr Jamie. But what is non sequitur? 103.116.208.33 (talk) 06:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Floating restaurant, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Chiara (name) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 22:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Crime in South Australia. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 10:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Be patient..there is a source103.116.208.33 (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please learn the policy at WP:EDITWAR. —valereee (talk) 12:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Midlife crisis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 15:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I did give a valid reason, ya imbecile.103.116.208.33 (talk) 08:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sundayclose (talk) 15:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Israeli passport, you may be blocked from editing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Restaurant. Your edit yet again broke the display of text in the article. David Biddulph (talk) 10:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Folland

You have been edit-warring with several editors on this page. It is a WP:SETINDEX article, not a DAB page, and not meant to have insignificant roads with no links to a person named Folland demonstrated, added to it. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple IPs

To anyone visiting this talk page: This person is continuing to edit-war and shows no understanding of the basics of Wikipedia editing nor willingness to learn, let alone WP:ETIQUETTE. In addition, I strongly suspect that they are the same person blocked under Special:Contributions/180.150.112.168 and Special:Contributions/113.197.13.138. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

All of your edits will be reversed as soon as you are blocked, so you may as well stop with the reverting. Just so you know: the reason you don't get a reason in the edit summary after you have kept on stubbornly reverting other editors' reversions is that you have been provided with reasons before and you don't listen or take it to the talk page of the article. You have wasted a lot of time for a lot of editors and have now run out of good faith reversions; once tools such as Twinkle are used for reverting, you don't get a reason any longer. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.