User talk:3000MAX

Welcome!

Hello, 3000MAX! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! paul2520 (talk) 02:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Frood (talk!) 04:31, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frood. Did you check the references? Because this person doesn't verify Wikipedia:Notability. My edit was not wrong. 3000MAX (talk) 05:04, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@3000MAX: The page has been deleted, but iirc you tagged it as {{db-g7}}, which is for when the the only (substantial) author is the one requesting deletion. {{db-person}} would've been more appropriate in this case. - Frood (talk!) 17:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frood Thank you for explaining that. 3000MAX (talk) 22:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Killing of Kian Pirfalak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing of Kian Pirfalak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Kian Pirfalak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sungodtemple (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Capernaum (film)

Hello! Your submission of Capernaum (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1978 Iranian politics, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts: Hijab in Iran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Drafts: Hijab in Iran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and this has apparently been moved by mistake to the mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. See Talk:Houthi involvement in the Israel–Hamas war#Requested move 12 January 2024.

*Please read and abide by the conditions in WP:ARBECR and WP:PIA.
*Please read the talk header section of pages in this topic area (or other toipcs which have been designated contentious topics for possible additional information and editing restrictions; you can find a full convenient list at Template:Contentious topics/alert/first#Codes).

*It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know.
If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse. // Timothy :: talk 14:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN and the ARBPIA CTOP

Howdy,

While your contributions to ITN are appreciated, unfortunately, you must be extended-confirmed in order to participate in ARBPIA-related discussions and articles, such as the Iranian consulate airstrike and WCK drone strike. While your account easily surpasses the 30-day age requirement, you're roughly 230 edits short of the 500-edit minimum. The Kip 21:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Islamic fundamentalism in Islamic Republic of Iran

Hello 3000MAX, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Islamic fundamentalism in Islamic Republic of Iran, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic fundamentalism in Islamic Republic of Iran.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dan Leonard}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dan • ✉ 04:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN nomination

Hi, per the banner at the top of that nomination you must have 500 edits to participate in that discussion. Can you please self-revert your last addition? nableezy - 20:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy I'll edit it to comment, i though that i finally reached the limit, I can just comment right? 3000MAX (talk) 23:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are at 324 edits, so you have not reached 500 edits, so no you may not comment there. Ive removed the comment already. nableezy - 23:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]