Jump to content

User talk:Jeromeenriquez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla, from its old location at User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 13:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for your comments on Draft:Manoj Durairaj. Accordingly I have revised it and resubmitted it. Your comments are welcome. best regards. ibk57. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibk57 (talkcontribs) 12:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 13:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Jeromeenriquez, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 13:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 18:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pereira (May 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pereira (June 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox/Ivan Pereira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/12/03/fr_ivan_pereira_new_bishop_of_jammu-srinagar/1113450. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ivan Pereira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/12/03/fr_ivan_pereira_new_bishop_of_jammu-srinagar/1113450. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a final warning - do not add text from any other location on to Wikipedia. If it has been published elsewhere, assume that it is copyrighted. It looks like I'm the first person to warn you, however you've posted so much copyrighted text that I need to warn you that any other copyvio will lead to a block from editing, possibly permanently. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ivan Pereira for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivan Pereira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Pereira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meatsgains (talk) 03:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cannibals A Rock Band From Manipur

[edit]

Cannibals band was formed in 1986 by Paul (Singer) with the line-up of Momocha on drums, Ritchie on Lead Guitar, Jimmy on Guitar and Mathew on Bass. The Band hails from Imphal, Manipur, India. Cannibals shot to fame instantly outclassing other bands in almost all the major competition of India, they became one of the most prominent rock in the country during the 80's. The band was at the summit of its career and toured all over India. Some of the achievement of the band was winning the North East Zone Musical competition, Dimapur, All India Western Music competition held at Shri Ram College, New Delhi and Music competition of St Xavier's etc. However, the glory days of Cannibals came to an end in 1992.

Cannibals also had two originals like the "Sweet Reggae" and "Dirty Boy Blues". see this, this and this Jerome E John 10:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ProgrammingGeek talktome 13:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yashovardhan (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gaan-Ngai has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gaan-Ngai. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 01:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Jeromeenriquez, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Burn Hall School have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tangmarg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Peter's High School, India has been accepted

[edit]
St. Peter's High School, India, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of schools in India
added links pointing to St. Mary's School, Delhi Public School, St. Joseph's School, Katra, St. Peter's High School, Christ School and Little Flower School
Baramulla district
added a link pointing to National Conference
St. Peter’s Higher Secondary School, Karan Bagh
added a link pointing to St. Peter's High School
Udhampur
added a link pointing to NH 1A

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Moravian Mission School, Leh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.rjelal.com/4.3.16c/793-804%20Dr.%20KHURSHEED%20AHMAD%20QAZI.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ProgrammingGeek talktome 17:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. ProgrammingGeek talktome 17:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. ProgrammingGeek talktome 17:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaan-Ngai (May 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. ProgrammingGeek talktome 17:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Johnstone Higher Secondary School, Imphal
added a link pointing to Sir James Johnstone
Leh
added a link pointing to IAS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of Catholic Churches in India) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating List of Catholic Churches in India, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful list!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of Christian Schools in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Adem20talk 20:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Christian Schools in India

[edit]

Hi, I'm Elliot321. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating List of Christian Schools in India!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add a lead section explaining the content of this page, then a heading, before the list. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elliot321 (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG, no significant coverage found after a Google search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. South Nashua (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carmel Gospel Missions

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carmel Gospel Missions for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 15:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. South Nashua (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alphonsa Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Nagercoil) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Alphonsa Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Nagercoil, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look this over and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (St. Marys School, Jajpur Road, Odisha) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating St. Marys School, Jajpur Road, Odisha, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look this over and see if you can add references which aren't WP:PRIMARYSOURCES? Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether St. Mary Joseph's High School, Hyderabad should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary Joseph's High School, Hyderabad .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ―Biochemistry🙴 06:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal. Thanks! ―Biochemistry🙴 06:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ―Biochemistry🙴 06:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you writing a list (so let's change the name) or an article (sources, please).Xx236 (talk) 09:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christ CMI Central School, Anjugramam for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christ CMI Central School, Anjugramam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ CMI Central School, Anjugramam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Japfü Christian College, Nagaland, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Thoppil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://directory.ucanews.com/bishops/bishop-thoppil/88. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Jeromeenriquez, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Leo Cornelio has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hi again, like I mentioned on my talk page, you cannot copy and paste text into Wikipedia. I was able to excise the text pasted into this article so we didn't have to delete all of it, but it was still a copyright violation that will require and administrator to delete the revision history. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nagaland Bible College requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://nagalandbiblecollege.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox images

[edit]

Hi, please see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE as infobox images have a different, simplified format to other images, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Holy Cross College of Nursing, Ambikapur, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yeryry (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Jeromeenriquez, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Holy Cross College of Nursing, Ambikapur have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Snehagiri Missionary Sisters

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Snehagiri Missionary Sisters for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadhu Sevana Sisters

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sadhu Sevana Sisters for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seva Missionary Sisters of Mary

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Seva Missionary Sisters of Mary for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sisters of Sacred Sciences

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sisters of Sacred Sciences for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ―Biochemistry🙴 17:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor TonyBallioni just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've removed the previous speedy deletion tag. Bishops are generally notable, but do your best to cite to independent reliable sources when you can. Google books is very good for this.

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

TonyBallioni (talk) 17:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, I'm reaching out to you because I see you've had some recent A7 taggings on South Asian Christian (mainly Catholic) topics. As I've expressed to you before, I appreciate people who are trying to expand the coverage of Catholicism in particular and Christianity in general in South Asia, because it is a significant historical and societal topic and it is one that we are lacking coverage of. A few pieces of advice:

  1. Bishops are almost always notable, but very few new page patrollers are familiar with a random diocese in India or Pakistan. You need to make it clear why we should have the bishop in the encyclopedia. The easiest way to do this is to show coverage in reliable sources when you create the article rather than waiting for me or one of the other people who can scrounge up sources on clerics comes around to save the day. Google Books is your friend here.
  2. Religious congregations are not always notable, and sometimes might not be significant. Bishops most admins will think twice about deleting via speedy deletion, but groupings of consecrated religious probably won't because they are organizations. If they are notable, demonstrate it through adding sources to independent coverage, either in newspapers, non-blog websites, or Books (again, Google Books is your friend).
  3. You've been doing much better on this from what I can tell, but saying it again just for emphasis: write everything in your own words. I will nominate a bishop for speedy deletion if it is 97% copied, and I'm one of the few people on new page patrol who knows enough about clerics to try to get them into shape as an article.

I hope this is helpful. If you have any questions, you are always free to reach out to me. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm PRehse. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PRehse (talk) 16:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Antony Pappusamy) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Antony Pappusamy, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. You may well be in the middle of adding stuff, but if not, can you please look it over and see if you can address the tags? This is an unreferenced biography of a living person, so is likely to be swiftly deleted as we have to be really careful about making unsubstantiated articles about living people.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ignatius Brouwer MHM (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (William D'Souza S.J.) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating William D'Souza S.J., Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please remove the first reference. You already have a link to the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Patna - and Wikipedia should never be given as a reference to support a statement. Ironically, ir is not regarded as reliable. Article seems to be an orphan - please update the RCA of P page which has a red link. The epithet SJ should not, I feel, be part of the article's title. I will rename this for you. Please add a title to the 2nd reference (highlighted in red on the article page)

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Stephen Lepcha) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Stephen Lepcha, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add some categories, embolden the article name in the lead sentence, and de-capitalise 'Ordained'. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Thomas Ignatius MacWan) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Thomas Ignatius MacWan, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please embolden the subject name in the lead sentence. Most importantly, please do not use capital letters for ordinary words where these are not part of a title. I'm seeing you do this a lot in many of your new articles, and it goes against Wikipedia's encyclopaedic style. e.g. 'Ordained' 'Installed' Please read WP:CAPITALIZATION for guidance on how to approach this in future.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 07:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Fr. Agnel School, Noida) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Fr. Agnel School, Noida, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Is this a secondary school? If so, it needs enhancing; if not, it may not meet notability guidelines and will be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Shalom Bible Seminary, Kohima

[edit]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating Shalom Bible Seminary, Kohima!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Wikipedia is not a directory, and this article is too short to be of use to anyone. Which country is it in - you may know where Nagaland is, but others won't? What is a seminary? It needs a wikilink to help explain. What does this educational establishment offer? Normally, college articles are far too wordy - this one is far too short, I feel

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur

[edit]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please state in the article what country this college is in, please

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 11:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the quality of your work

[edit]

Hi. I'm reaching out to you to encourage you to help make Wikipedia a really great encyclopedia. You'll see I have been page patrolling a number of incredibly short articles you have been producing recently. Your enthusiasm is to be welcomed, but so is quality of content. Put yourself in the shoes of someone who does not live in India as you do, and doesn't know what the subject is about. It's your responsibility to help them understand, and to do it in a way that follows the layout and style of all the other articles here. I can see you've been working hard to improve this (after a rather shaky start), but I'd like to suggest a few things you need to consider doing:

  • SLOW DOWN! It's not a race to create the largest number of articles. Quality is more important than quantity. Focus on quality, please!
  • Embolden the title in the first sentence of the article - you seem to forget to do this sometimes. It would help if you would go back and check all the articles you have created for this omission, please.
  • Put references after the stated facts - not after the name of the article, just three or four words in.
  • Add at least one or two categories to every article.
  • Do not use capital letters for words like 'ordination' or 'bishop'. Save them only for use with real titles and organisation names. Saying that someone was made a bishop is fine; saying they were made a Bishop is not. See John Barwa or Sarat Chandra Nayak.
  • If it's a secondary school, say so clearly in the article. People like me, with no strong interest in the subject, won't then have to waste their time trying to decide whether to put one of your quite poor stubs forward for speedy deletion as non-notable. If it's a secondary school, it is inherently notable. So please just help us by saying so clearly! See Little Flower School, Imphal and St. Joseph's School, Imphalla (which both also need wikilinks and country, too, please.)
  • Say more! I think you now know that it's not OK to copy and paste words from other websites. But that should not stop you putting important information about the subject in your own words. Many of your new articles are little more than a couple of sentences - rather like a directory, when they could be so much better. Tell us what age groups these colleges take; use wikilinks to words like seminary or bishop to help others understand what they are (e.g.Nicholas of Lesvos; tell us what country these people or places are in, and use wikilinks with them. (see Sarat Chandra Nayak Surprisingly, most other articles on unknown schools and colleges are far too wordy, and go into inordinate amounts of trivial detail. Yours are the opposite! Make them just a bit longer to give the reader enough basic information about them.
  • Do not use Wikipedia as a reference. It is not regarded as a 'reliable source'. Put links to Wikipedia either as a wikilink, or create a 'See Also' section which you can list them in. e.g. Cettin
  • Don't leave it to others to clean up after you. Take the time to understand the importance of Wikipedia's Manual of Style so you get the content and the layout right first time, and don't leave a mess behind for others to sort out.

Please take this in the positive and supportive way that was intended. I'm copying this message to @TonyBallioni: as I can tell that they are also keen to see you improve your work here so it's something you can be really proud of. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 11:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Christ School, Poonch

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Christ School, Poonch should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ School, Poonch .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Nick Moyes (talk) 12:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 04:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in infoboxes

[edit]

Please stop adding flags to infoboxes - as per MOS:ICON#Avoid_flag_icons_in_infoboxes these are only allowed in very limited cases, such as international sportspeople - not writers - which you have been adding them to. Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You do not appear willing to correct your previous incorrect edits, and in this edit at 17.23, nearly an hour after our earlier posts, you move the flag, rather than deleting it.
Furthermore, you keep adding links to disambiguation pages, such as Indian, which will also need to be revisited and corrected.
I have been trying to unpick your previous edits, and only remove the flags, but it would be much easier just to revert them all. Please take responsibility for your previous actions and resolve them. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Béchara Abou Mrad

[edit]

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating Béchara Abou Mrad!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding additional sources and footnotes will help readers verify the content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - Nocowardsoulismine (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ladislao Bukowinski

[edit]

Hi - you may not have noticed that the page you have recently created, Ladislao Bukowinski, already exists since December 2015 as Wladyslaw Bukowinski. You may want to incorporate the information from your page into that article and I, in the meantime, have already placed a template requesting a merger with the article already in existence. Lord Sidious 82 (talk) 11:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aleixo das Neves Dias has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 23:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About NPP

[edit]

Like Tony said, your work is appreciated, and I hope you won't get discouraged. If you can follow the advice to involve yourself a little bit more in the policy areas of Wikipedia, message me again next month. Regards, Alex ShihTalk 05:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hindi as the official language of India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly duplicates Languages of India and Hindi. Would need heavy copy-edit if kept because a rough quality translation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you wish to create a new article based upon a draft article you have created please move the article rather than blanking the original and creating a new one from scratch as you did with St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla. Thank you. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 01:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you Uncle Milty for the tip. Will keep in mind for future. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/María Teresalina Sánchez at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Alwyn Fernandes Barreto

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anthony Alwyn Fernandes Barreto for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arbustum (talk) 17:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anthony Alwyn Fernandes Barreto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://directory.ucanews.com/bishops/bishop-fernandes-barreto/197. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Arbustum (talk) 17:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Jim Borst at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Indian Missionary Society (September 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nominations

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Akbar's Church at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Bunkerd Kitbamrung at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Akbar's Church

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Akbar's Church at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! TonyBallioni (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Nicholas Bunkerd Kitbamrung

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Nicholas Bunkerd Kitbamrung at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 12:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bastiampillai Anthonipillai Thomas

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Bastiampillai Anthonipillai Thomas at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akhu Chingangbam for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akhu Chingangbam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhu Chingangbam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tingkao Ragwang Chapriak (TRC) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=manipur.Manipur_and_Religion.Tingkao_Ragwang_Chapriak_Part_1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing

[edit]

Hi Jeromeenriquez, Tony has been kindly going through some of your recent contributions, and several of them had clear cases of close paraphrasing. This is a common mistake: Even if you cite the sources correctly, you still have to summarize the source content in your own words, or add quotation marks if you are incorporating a phrase. Failing to do so runs the risk of copyright violations. Regards, Alex ShihTalk 03:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeromeenriquez, prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 07:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. I'm sorry I've had to file this, but as Diannaa has explained above, this is a policy with legal implications and unfortunately I've stumbled across enough copyright violations last night and today where I think we need to look through your contributions more systemically to see if the text is free. This is not undervaluing the positive work that you do, but unfortunately Wikipedia cannot allow copyright violations on its website, so when the issue becomes a pattern, we have to look into it. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Simon Srugi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.salesianmissions.org/about-us/ven-simon-srugi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Review

[edit]

Hey, you just added yourself to the Wikipedia:Peer review volunteer list for religion. If you have some time to look over Wikipedia:Peer_review/Mullá_Husayn/archive2 I'd really appreciate it.penultimate_supper (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pius Thomas D’Souza has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 14:43, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vasemmistolainen Thank you. I have already provided the references.Jeromeenriquez (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeromeenriquez (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do agree that i have been warned in past about copyright, but can't you notice that i haven't repeated the same. I am still working on the article that you have picked up and blocked me without any notice. I really don't understand one thing about all of us at Wikipedia, we are always in a hurry to point out mistakes in other's works rather than waiting for sometime and letting the other person finish his or her piece of work. We are all trying to contribute in the best possible way to make Wikipedia a beautiful, simple and complete platform of knowledge for the world but pointing out issues in each others contribution that too without waiting for the them to complete it, is very irritating and disheartening act. I am really sorry to say but if we continue like this people will keep turning away from contributing on Wikipedia. I have been contributing on Wikipedia from past one year but haven't received any word of appreciation, have only received warnings, errors, notifications and today i have finally been blocked because of a reason that i was still working on the article and had pasted few lines from some other source but was intending to change them into my own words. The copyright policy was advised to me by User:TonyBallioni and i did read it.

Decline reason:

You can not place copyrighted material that has not been released under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence (or freer) here on Wikipedia, not for one revision or even for one second. The moment you hit Save when there is even one example of copyright violation in your text, you are breaking Wikipedia's copyright policy and you are breaking the law. You will not be unblocked until you understand that and give a believable commitment to adhering to it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Jeromeenriquez, I alerted Diannaa to this situation, and I am very sad that it had to come to a block, but I wanted an uninvolved administrator to make the call since you and I have a good relationship (it is also the reason I will not be unblocking, someone who is uninvolved needs to judge). The issue here, as I have tried to explain before is that Wikipedia certifies that every revision on its site can be reused under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. We simply cannot have any text that has been copied wholesale on this website at any time.
    As I mentioned, I consider myself somewhat WP:INVOLVED, with you, so I will not be taking any administrative action in regards to blocking or unblocking, but what I suggest you do to let another administrator review is the following: promise to completely write the prose of your articles off Wikipedia before creating them. Your problem seems to be that you use the sources and then try to work towards removing the copyright violations. Doing this in a text file rather than on Wikipedia is the best way to do this. Also, I thought I had told you before, but if I haven't, I do appreciate all the good content you write for Wikipedia. I just want to make sure it follows the law and our terms of use. Much of it does, but you currently have too many articles that don't. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jeromeenriquez (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thank you everyone for explaining and guiding me. I did read the copyright policy once again today and i agree and understand that i have violated the policy and i promise not to do so again. As TonyBallioni mentioned, i do use the material from other websites and change them on the interface in my own words. I promise i will write the articles in my own words and will make all the changes before i save it. I will also edit all my existing articles that may contain any material that violates copyright policy. Kindly give me a chance to add some more topics to Wikipedia. Thank You all once again for support.

Accept reason:

I am unblocking your account, because you clearly now understand the strict expectations of our copyright policy, and will follow that policy in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ignatius Brouwer MHM, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Please add your sources to List of Christian hospitals in India. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)

[edit]

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ignatius Brouwer MHM

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ignatius Brouwer MHM".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution

[edit]

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Christian hospitals in India for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Christian hospitals in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian hospitals in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Panikulam for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Panikulam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Panikulam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 14:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Indian Missionary Society, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alobo Naga

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alobo Naga for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indian Missionary Society has been accepted

[edit]
Indian Missionary Society, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project Tiger Writing Contest

[edit]

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. I am asking people related to the Wiki Project: Jammu and Kashmir or related to Kashmir in anyway for help related to improving the Wikipedia page Sports in Jammu and Kashmir. The aim is to make it a good article, and also rated as a Good Quality article ( GA) or higher ( FA). Images are also needed as well. LOOKING FORWARD TO A GREAT COLLABORATIVE EFFORT!!! Happy Editing. :) DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 16:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brendan Reichs (April 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl | talk 09:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Paulsamy (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~Kvng (talk) 14:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: May 2018

[edit]

ICHTHUS

May 2018

Project News
By Lionelt

Last month's auspicious relaunch of our newsletter precipitated something of an uproar in the Wikipedia community. What started as a localized edit war over censorship spilled over onto the Administrator's Noticeboard finally ending up at Wikipedia's supreme judicial body ArbCom. Their ruling resulted in the admonishment of administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise for his involvement in the dispute. The story was reported by Wikipedia's venerable flagship newspaper The Signpost.

The question of whether to delete all portals--including the 27 Christianity-related portals--was put to the Wikipedia community. Approximately 400 editors have participated in the protracted discussion. Going by !votes, Oppose deletion has a distinct majority. The original Christianity Portal was created on November 5, 2005 by Brisvegas and the following year he successfully nominated the portal for Featured Portal. The Transhumanist has revived WikiProject Portals with hopes of revitalizing Wikipedia's system of 1,515 portals.

Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project Watch


Achievements

Four articles in the Project were promoted to GA: Edict of Torda nom. by Borsoka, Jim Bakker nom. by LovelyGirl7, Ralph Abernathy nom. by Coffee and Psalm 84 nom. by Gerda_Arendt. The Psalm ends with "O Lord of hosts, blessed is the man that trusteth in thee." Words to live by. Please support our members and send some WikiLove to the nominators!

Featured article
Nominated by Spangineer

The reconstructed frame of Nate Saint's plane used in Operation Auca

Operation Auca was an attempt by five Evangelical Christian missionaries from the United States to make contact with the Huaorani people of the rainforest of Ecuador. The Huaorani, also known as the Aucas, were an isolated tribe known for their violence, both against their own people and outsiders who entered their territory. With the intention of being the first Protestants to evangelize the Huaorani, the missionaries began making regular flights over Huaorani settlements in September 1955, dropping gifts. After several months of exchanging gifts, on January 2, 1956, the missionaries established a camp at "Palm Beach", a sandbar along the Curaray River, a few miles from Huaorani settlements. Their efforts culminated on January 8, 1956, when all five—Jim Elliot, Nate Saint, Ed McCully, Peter Fleming, and Roger Youderian—were attacked and speared by a group of Huaorani warriors. The news of their deaths was broadcast around the world, and Life magazine covered the event with a photo essay. The deaths of the men galvanized the missionary effort in the United States, sparking an outpouring of funding for evangelization efforts around the world. Their work is still frequently remembered in evangelical publications, and in 2006, was the subject of the film production End of the Spear. (more...)


Did You Know
Nominated by Dahn

"... that, shortly after being sentenced to death for treason, Ioan C. Filitti became manager of the National Theatre Bucharest?"


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom• Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 19:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus June 2018

[edit]

ICHTHUS

June 2018

Project news
By Lionelt

Here are discussions relevant to the Project:

The following articles need reviewers for GA-class: Type of Constans nom. by Gog the Mild, Tian Feng (magazine) nom. by Finnusertop. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project Watch


Did You Know
Nominated by Gonzonoir

... that in 1636, Phineas Hodson, Chancellor of York Minster, lost his 38-year-old wife Jane during the birth of the couple's 24th child?

Featured article
Nominated by Cliftonian

The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara, painting by Moritz Daniel Oppenheim, 1862. This depiction departs significantly from the historical record of how Mortara was taken—no clergy were present, for example.
The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara

The Mortara case was a controversy precipitated by the Papal States' seizure of Edgardo Mortara, a six-year-old Jewish child, from his family in Bologna, Italy, in 1858. The city's inquisitor, Father Pier Feletti, heard from a servant that she had administered emergency baptism to the boy when he fell sick as an infant, and the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition held that this made the child irrevocably a Catholic. Because the Papal States had forbidden the raising of Christians by members of other faiths, it was ordered that he be taken from his family and brought up by the Church. After visits from the child's father, international protests mounted, but Pope Pius IX would not be moved. The boy grew up as a Catholic with the Pope as a substitute father, trained for the priesthood in Rome until 1870, and was ordained in France three years later. In 1870 the Kingdom of Italy captured Rome during the unification of Italy, ending the pontifical state; opposition across Italy, Europe and the United States over Mortara's treatment may have contributed to its downfall. (Full article...)


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 11:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus: July 2018

[edit]

ICHTHUS

July 2018

The Top 7 report
By Lionelt

The big news was the marriage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The Top 7 most popular articles in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Elizabeth I of England – legendary monarch who ushered in the Elizabethan Era over the dead body of her half-sister (#5)
    2. Henry VIII of England – on his deathbed the last words of the king who founded the English Reformation were "Monks! Monks! Monks!"
    3. Martin Luther King Jr. – can't wait to see the new US$5 bill featuring the "I Have a Dream" speech
    4. Seven deadly sins – surprisingly "original research" is not one of the Seven deadly sins
    5. Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC)
    6. Michael Curry (bishop) – our article says that he upstaged Meghan at her wedding. Did you see her wedding pictures? All I can say is {{dubious}}
    7. Robert F. Kennedy – when informed that missiles were being installed in Cuba he famously quipped, "Can they hit Oxford, Mississippi?"


Did you know
Nominated by The C of E

... that the little-known 1758 Methodist hymn "Sun of Unclouded Righteousness" asks God to send the doctrine of the "Unitarian fiend ... back to hell", referring to both Islam and Unitarianism?

Our newest Featured list
Nominated by Freikorp

[[File:|200px|The Last Judgment by painter Hans Memling. ]]
The Last Judgment by painter Hans Memling.

List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. Predictions of apocalyptic events that would result in the extinction of humanity, a collapse of civilization, or the destruction of the planet have been made since at least the beginning of the Christian Era. Most predictions are related to Abrahamic religions, often standing for or similar to the eschatological events described in their scriptures. Christian predictions typically refer to events like the Rapture, Great Tribulation, Last Judgment, and the Second Coming of Christ.

Polls conducted in 2012 across 20 countries found over 14% of people believe the world will end in their lifetime, with percentages raging from 6% of people in France to 22% in the US and Turkey. In the UK in 2015, the general public believed the likeliest cause would be nuclear war, while experts thought it would be artificial intelligence. Between one and three percent of people from both countries thought the apocalypse would be caused by zombies or alien invasion. (more...)


Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 06:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Peer review newsletter #1

[edit]

Introduction

[edit]

Hello to all! I do not intend to write a regular peer review newsletter but there does occasionally come a time when those interested in contributing to peer review should be contacted, and now is one. I've mailed this out to everyone on the peer review volunteers list, and some editors that have contributed to past discussions. Apologies if I've left you off or contacted you and you didn't want it. Next time there is a newsletter / mass message it will be opt in (here), I'll talk about this below - but first:

  • THANK YOU! I want to thank you for your contributions and for volunteering on the list to help out at peer review. Thank you!
  • Peer review is useful! It's good to have an active peer review process. This is often the way that we help new or developing editors understand our ways, and improve the quality of their editing - so it fills an important and necessary gap between the teahouse (kindly introduction to our Wikiways) and GA and FA reviews (specific standards uphelp according to a set of quality criteria). And we should try and improve this process where possible (automate, simplify) so it can be used and maintained easily.

Updates

[edit]
It can get quite lonely tinkering with peer review...
With a bit of effort we can renovate the place to look like this!

Update #1: the peer review volunteers list is changing

[edit]

The list is here in case you've forgotten: WP:PRV. Kadane has kindly offered to create a bot that will ping editors on the volunteers list with unanswered reviews in their chosen subject areas every so often. You can choose the time interval by changing the "contact" parameter. Options are "never", "monthly", "quarterly", "halfyearly", and "annually". For example:

  • {{PRV|JohnSmith|History of engineering|contact=monthly}} - if placed in the "History" section, JohnSmith will receive an automatic update every month about unanswered peer reviews relating to history.
  • {{PRV|JaneSmith|Mesopotamian geography, Norwegian fjords|contact=annually}} - if placed in the "Geography" section, JaneSmith will receive an automatic update every yearly about unanswered peer reviews in the geography area.

We can at this stage only use the broad peer review section titles to guide what reviews you'd like, but that's better than nothing! You can also set an interest in multiple separate subject areas that will be updated at different times.

Update #2: a (lean) WikiProject Peer review

[edit]

I don't think we need a WikiProject with a giant bureaucracy nor all sorts of whiz-bang features. However over the last few years I've found there are times when it would have been useful to have a list of editors that would like to contribute to discussions about the peer review process (e.g. instructions, layout, automation, simplification etc.). Also, it can get kind of lonely on the talk page as I am (correct me if I'm wrong) the only regular contributor, with most editors moving on after 6 - 12 months.

So, I've decided to create "WikiProject Peer review". If you'd like to contribute to the WikiProject, or make yourself available for future newsletters or contact, please add yourself to the list of members.

Update #3: advertising

[edit]

We plan to do some advertising of peer review, to let editors know about it and how to volunteer to help, at a couple of different venues (Signpost, Village pump, Teahouse etc.) - but have been waiting until we get this bot + WikiProject set up so we have a way to help interested editors make more enduring contributions. So consider yourself forewarned!

And... that's it!

I wish you all well on your Wikivoyages, Tom (LT) (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad First, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 16:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvain Fort moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created via translation, Sylvain Fort, has far too many translation errors to remain in article space. The publications lists contain large swaths of bare ISBNs, the infobox needs to be unsubstituted and turned back into an infobox, dates in references need to be translated to English, stray HTML error messages removed, etc. In future, please take care to bring your article closer to completion before adding it to article space. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 17:13, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Jerome Church (Mapusa) has been accepted

[edit]
St. Jerome Church (Mapusa), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Joseph Aind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to SDB
Lawrence Subrata Howlader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to CSC
St Joseph’s Higher Secondary School, Baramulla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to MHM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Simick (September 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

[edit]

Information icon - Please do NOT add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at St. Xavier's School, Rohini, and numerous other schools articles, as this contravenes WP:INDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Simick has been accepted

[edit]
Paul Simick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TonyBallioni (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelo Caiban Abarquez has been accepted

[edit]
Isabelo Caiban Abarquez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TonyBallioni (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kalapi Tirth moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Kalapi Tirth, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalapi Tirth (October 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:34, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vincent Aind has been accepted

[edit]
Vincent Aind, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited María Teresalina Sánchez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Joseph's Catholic Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Diego Luis de San Vitores (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blessed
Francis Xavier Seelos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blessed
Mary Frances Schervier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blessed
Teresa Demjanovich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blessed

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Angelo Acerbi. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Formal names versus common names in infoboxes

[edit]

Jerome!

I notice that you've recently replaced the common names used in some infoboxes with formal names, as you did at F. Scott Fitzgerald. While I understand the instinct, the documentation for that template specifically states "Use the common name, typically name of article." I'm undoing some of these changes; could you check for any more you may have done? --Nat Gertler (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice note... although in the future, you may want to place such notes not on a User page like User:NatGertler, but on their talk page, like User talk:NatGertler. The User page is mainly for the user to write about themselves. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi Meetup

[edit]
Hi ! @Jeromeenriquez: Thanks for signing up, look forward to see you at the venue tomorrow. For any assistance you can contact here.Please get your laptop.--Abhinav619 (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Church of Immaculate Conception has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 10:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Dooley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Campbell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalapi Museum has been accepted

[edit]
Kalapi Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalapi Museum for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalapi Museum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalapi Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 22:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu Gadhavi moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Hemu Gadhavi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oswald Lewis (bishop) has been accepted

[edit]
Oswald Lewis (bishop), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

• Gene93k (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Lyngdoh has been accepted

[edit]
Victor Lyngdoh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 21:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Appreciating your selfless contribution to wikipedia! Keep going... Rawlsians (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis Serrao has been accepted

[edit]
Francis Serrao, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 10:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 05:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marco Mellino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Paulsamy has been accepted

[edit]
Thomas Paulsamy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sylvain Fort (December 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
K.e.coffman (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jeromeenriquez. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Sylvain Fort, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Teresa of St. Rose of Lima

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez,

Thanks for creating Teresa of St. Rose of Lima! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for several issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad First.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St. Paul's Senior Secondary School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus June 2019

[edit]

ICHTHUS

June 2019
The Top 6 Articles
By Stalinsunnykvj

The sad news was the 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings. The Top 6 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Louis XIV of France – a monarch of the House of Bourbon who reigned as King of France. He did say, "Every time I appoint someone to a vacant position, I make a hundred unhappy and one ungrateful."
    2. Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC), Mary was found guilty of plotting to assassinate Elizabeth I of England in 1586, and was beheaded the following year.
    3. Elizabeth I of England – The Virgin Queen, Elizabeth was the last of the five monarchs of the House of Tudor who ushered in the Elizabethan Era, reversed re-establishment of Roman Catholicism by her half-sister.
    4. Henry VIII of EnglandKing of England, He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his known piece of music is "Pastime with Good Company". He is often reputed to have written "Greensleeves" but probably did not. He had six marriages.
    5. Martin Luther King Jr.
      " There are three urgent and indeed great problems that we face not only in the United States of America but all over the world today. That is the problem of racism, the problem of poverty and the problem of war."
    6. Billy Ray Cyrus – Having released 12 studio albums and 44 singles since 1992, he is best known for his number one single "Achy Breaky Heart", which became the first single ever to achieve triple Platinum status in Australia.
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj

... that the first attempt to build the Holy Trinity Cathedral of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra resulted in the demolition of the nearly completed structure?

Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral, Cork, Ireland
Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral, Cork, Ireland

Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral is a Gothic Revival three-spire cathedral in the city of Cork, Ireland. It belongs to the Church of Ireland and was completed in 1879. The cathedral is located on the south side of the River Lee, on ground that has been a place of worship since the 7th century, and is dedicated to Finbarr of Cork, patron saint of the city. It was once in the Diocese of Cork; it is now one of the three cathedrals in the Church of Ireland Diocese of Cork, Cloyne and Ross, in the ecclesiastical province of Dublin. Christian use of the site dates back to a 7th-century AD monastery, which according to legend was founded by Finbarr of Cork. The entrances contain the figures of over a dozen biblical figures, capped by a tympanum showing a Resurrection scene. (more...)

Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.




Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 10:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hemu Gadhavi

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hemu Gadhavi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 10:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Constantine Vendrame) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Constantine Vendrame.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Constantine Vendrame. Note that the article is currently an "orphan" meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whether Outline of Catholic canon law requires sources

[edit]

There is a discussion of whether Outline of Catholic canon law requires sources to exist in articlespace here: User_talk:CASSIOPEIA#Outline_of_Catholic_canon_law.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shyamal Bose (bishop) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2019-05/pope-francis-india-baruipur-appointment-coadjutor-bishop-bose.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. StudiesWorld (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent WP:AN report

[edit]

I've closed it as stale. The issue was over a year ago. Regarding the content of your report, you come across as having a somewhat OWNy attitude to articles you created. The other user cited reliable sources for their contributions. NPOV means DUE weight to all viewpoints, generally not just one viewpoint. Bellezzasolo Discuss 16:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dominic Lumon.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dominic Lumon.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:John Barwa.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:John Barwa.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 21:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bishop Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 21:18, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your report to AN...

[edit]

Please read WP:OWN. It's not your article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:31, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Improper use of copyrighted images

[edit]

Please note that Wikipedia policy does not allow nonfree (copyrighted) images of living persons to be used, absent unusual circumstances (eg long-term institutionalization/incarceration, fugitives). Most of the images you have uploaded recently violate this rule and will be summarily deleted. Even the acceptable images do not have valid use rationales, because they do not specify that the person depicted has died, so that there is no possibility of creating a free photograph, and that no free images are available. If you continue to ignored this longstanding policy, your editing privileges are likely to be limited or suspended entirely. Please review WP:NFCC and, as necessary, associated pages. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Ignatius D'Souza.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Ignatius D'Souza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Ivan Pereira.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Ivan Pereira.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kishore Kumar Kujur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 14:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus July 2019

[edit]

ICHTHUS

July 2019
The Top 6 Articles
By Stalinsunnykvj

A suicide attack on July 11th claimed by Islamic State (IS) near a church in the Syrian city of Qamishli shows that Christians remain a major target of the terror group. The Top 6 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Henry VIII of EnglandKing of England, He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his known piece of music is "Pastime with Good Company". He is often reputed to have written "Greensleeves" but probably did not. He had six marriages.
    2. Elena Cornaro Piscopia – was a Venetian philosopher of noble descent who in 1678 became one of the first women to receive an academic degree from a university, and the first to receive a Doctor of Philosophy degree. In 1669, she translated the Colloquy of Christ by Carthusian monk Lanspergius from Spanish into Italian.
    3. Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC), Mary was found guilty of plotting to assassinate Elizabeth I of England in 1586, and was beheaded the following year.
    4. Bob Dylan – American singer-songwriter, author, and visual artist.
      " Take care of all your memories. For you cannot relive them."
    5. Elizabeth I of England – The Virgin Queen, Elizabeth was the last of the five monarchs of the House of Tudor who ushered in the Elizabethan Era, reversed re-establishment of Roman Catholicism by her half-sister.
    6. Billy Ray Cyrus – Having released 12 studio albums and 44 singles since 1992, he is best known for his number one single "Achy Breaky Heart", which became the first single ever to achieve triple Platinum status in Australia.
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
... that The Vision of Dorotheus is one of the earliest examples of Christian hexametric poetry?
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
Eric and Leslie Ludy were 21 and 16 respectively when they first met, English professors suggest that older singles are unlikely to gather hope from their story.
Eric and Leslie Ludy were 21 and 16 respectively when they first met, English professors suggest that older singles are unlikely to gather hope from their story.

When God Writes Your Love Story: The Ultimate Approach to Guy/Girl Relationships is a 1999 book by Eric and Leslie Ludy, an American married couple. After becoming a bestseller on the Christian book market, the book was republished in 2004 and then revised and expanded in 2009. It tells the story of the authors' first meeting, courtship, and marriage. The authors advise single people not to be physically or emotionally intimate with others, but to wait for the spouse that God has planned for them.

The book is divided into five sections and sixteen chapters. Each chapter is written from the perspective of one of the two authors; nine are by Eric, while Leslie wrote seven, as well as the introduction. The Ludys argue that one's love life should be both guided by and subordinate to one's relationship with God. Leslie writes that God offers new beginnings to formerly unchaste or sexually abused individuals. (more...)

Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.




Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 12:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India

[edit]

Namaste, Jeromeenriquez. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.




Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sylvain Fort, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sylvain Fort

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sylvain Fort".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus December 2019

[edit]

ICHTHUS

WikiProject Christianity
December 2019
The Top 3 Articles

By Stalinsunnykvj

The Top 3 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Dolly Parton - an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music. Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: " I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
    2. Harriet Tubman - an American abolitionist and political activist. Born into slavery, she escaped and made some missions to rescue enslaved people, using the network of antislavery activists and Underground Railroads. During the American Civil War, she served as an armed scout, spy for the Union Army.
    3. Henry VIII of EnglandKing of England, He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his known piece of music is "Pastime with Good Company". He is often reputed to have written "Greensleeves" but probably did not. He had six marriages.
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
  • ... that St. Charles College in Louisiana was the first Jesuit college established in the southern United States?
  • ... that the ancient Jewish text of Perek Shirah asserts that spiders and rats praise God using verses from Psalm 150?
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj

Being a Ghost Story of Christmas, commonly known as A Christmas Carol, is a novella by Charles Dickens, first published in London by Chapman & Hall in 1843 and illustrated by John Leech. The book is divided into five chapters, which Dickens titled "staves". A Christmas Carol recounts the story of Ebenezer Scrooge, an elderly miser who is visited by the ghost of his former business partner Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come. After their visits, Scrooge is transformed into a kinder, gentler man. (more...)

Bible Verse

Romans 12:10 New King James Version (NKJV)

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.


Quotes
" I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year."
Charles Dickens – British novelist, journalist, editor, illustrator and social critic.

Happy Holidays!

The end of the year is a time of year for remembrance. We take stock of where we came from, and have a moment to think about where we are going...

At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling.

May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.

Best Wishes!



WikiProject Christianity
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity © Copyleft 2019
QuestionsDiscussionsNewsroomUnsubscribe
Delivered: 16:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


Ichthus January 2020

[edit]

ICHTHUS

WikiProject Christianity
January 2020
The Top 3 Articles

By Stalinsunnykvj

The Top 3 most-popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Pope Benedict XVI – retired prelate of the Catholic Church who served as head of the Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State from 2005 until his resignation.
    2. Pope Francis – the head of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State. Francis is the first Jesuit pope, the first from the Americas, the first from the Southern Hemisphere, and the first pope from outside Europe since the Syrian Gregory III, who reigned in the 8th century.
    3. Dolly Parton – an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music. Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: "I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
Сретение Господне ("The Meeting of the Lord"), a depiction of Simeon recognising Jesus at the Temple, from a fifteenth-century Novgorodskye School Russian icon.
Сретение Господне ("The Meeting of the Lord"), a depiction of Simeon recognising Jesus at the Temple, from a fifteenth-century Novgorodskye School Russian icon.

A Song for Simeon, is a 37-line poem written in 1928 by American-English poet T. S. Eliot (1888–1965). It is one of five poems that Eliot contributed to the Ariel poems series of 38 pamphlets by several authors published by Faber and Gwyer. "A Song for Simeon" was the sixteenth in the series and included an illustration by avant garde artist Edward McKnight Kauffer. The poem's narrative echoes the text of the Nunc dimittis, a liturgical prayer for Compline from the Gospel passage. Eliot introduces literary allusions to earlier writers Lancelot Andrewes, Dante Alighieri and St. John of the Cross. Critics have debated whether Eliot's depiction of Simeon is a negative portrayal of a Jewish figure and evidence of anti-Semitism on Eliot's part. (more...)

Bible Verse

Psalm 20:4 New King James Version (NKJV)

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.


Quotes
"Faith lived in the incognito is one which is located outside the criticism coming from society, from politics, from history, for the very reason that it has itself the vocation to be a source of criticism. It is faith (lived in the incognito) which triggers the issues for the others, which causes everything seemingly established to be placed in doubt, which drives a wedge into the world of false assurances."
~ Jacques Ellul
French philosopher, sociologist, and professor who was a noted Christian anarchist.
Quotations related to Jacques Ellul at Wikiquote

Happy New Year!

At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling.
May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.

Best Wishes!


WikiProject Christianity
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity © Copyleft 2020
QuestionsDiscussionsNewsroomUnsubscribe
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The India Star
Thank you for your contributions to WikiProject India, especially your creation of St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Baramulla). Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 20:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am very happy. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 08:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Christianity Barnstar
Dear Jeromeenriquez, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your creation of St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 20:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge

[edit]
WikiProject India Hello Jeromeenriquez. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:I have been blocked

[edit]

Dear User:Jeromeenriquez, I checked your contributions and you are currently not blocked. Feel free to continue to edit as before! I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 06:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jeromeenriquez (talk) 10:28, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Kuwar

[edit]

Could you please let me know what do you mean by this — how's an article which is available on Simple, but not on enwiki a duplicate? - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 19:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was done by mistake Jeromeenriquez (talk) 20:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Priyanka_NK

[edit]

Dear User:Jeromeenriquez, Kindly check the references cited, the external links and the notable discography in order to verify the notability of the subject concerned. [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Priyanka_NK ].

Ok Jeromeenriquez (talk) 10:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Jeromeenriquez Kindly have a look at the draft [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Priyanka_NK ] and the references. I hope valid references have been cited. Kindly approve if everything is fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theglobalbiz (talkcontribs) 07:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

V P Hansrani

[edit]

Hey friend, I hope the page which I created is OK. I'm a researcher who specialises on early Indian migration to the UK and the Indian Independence Movement. If there are any questions about what I've written, please do let me know :). Using the sources cited, I'd also like to create pages on the other men who are of historical significance within the IWA/India League.


JumpingJimmySingh (talk) 17:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Depiction by Raphael of Aristotle in the School of Athens receiving some useful feedback during an active peer review

Hello to all! This is the second Wikipedia Peer Review newsletter, containing some updates relating to peer review since the initial newsletter in August 2018. I intend these as infrequent newsletters that can be used to interact with interested editors and also let people know about relevant changes.

Thanks again to everyone who has been responding and helping out at peer review, it's great to see the venue so active.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, want to include something in the next newsletter, wish to receive these, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or add / remove your name from the mailing list.

Yours, --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's new?

[edit]
New closure script

There's a new script you can use to automate the process of closing a review. Now, for most reviews you just need to click a button (hurray!)

Developed by User:WritKeeper, to whom we are all very thankful, there is a script to help automate closing peer reviews. To use the script:

  • Copy importScript('User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/peerReviewCloser.js'); into your Special:MyPage/common.js
  • When you view a review, click on the tab that says "More" and then "Close peer review". The tab can be found near the "History" tab

I've added it to the list of tools here: Wikipedia:Peer_review/Tools#Closure_script

Volunteers list contacts

Editors can now choose to be contacted periodically by User:KadaneBot with unanswered peer reviews in specific topic areas. If you'd like to be contacted, please visit the volunteers page and update your preferences

Peer reviews on "Article alerts"

If you're a member of a WikiProject, you may have noticed peer reviews getting included in the article alerts lists, which is sure to enhance our subject-specific visibility.

How can I contribute?

[edit]
  1. Answer some reviews! A list of unanswered reviews is here: (WP:PRWAITING)
  2. Add yourself to the volunteers list, and receive regular updates about unanswered reviews here: (WP:PRV)
  3. Or, if you only want one request a blue moon, Click "watch" on the list of items that somehow missed getting added to the unanswered list (here). Sometimes, these reviews linger for months!!

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Peer Review users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

hi

[edit]

well i read some of you article and i have one think to say KEEP IT UP.2405:201:5502:D04C:10F3:650:7946:84AA (talk) 16:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez

Thank you for creating Martin Su Yao-wen.

User:Dps04, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for this article. Consider improving the article with more external references from reliable sources which discusses the topic.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dps04}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dps04 (talk) 17:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dps04: Thank you Jeromeenriquez (talk)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Raffaella Cimatti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blessed. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Manoj Verma (IPS)- Article for creation Submission review request

[edit]

hello, please see my new article made and check if there is any error or not pls leave me a message on my talk page. Nobody is accepting it because of less references. But 11 references has given on this article with well citiation. Dibyojyoti RC (talk) 08:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will see to it. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made significant changes to this draft to address WP:NPOV issues since the last decline. What more specifically would need to happen here to meet your acceptance criteria? ~Kvng (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, you are much more experienced then me with Wikipedia, the article doesn’t look like an article, it looks like the events calendar. It’s only the events have been listed and nothing else. You are well experienced, so you are the better person to make it better. Please put this article right and resubmit. Thanks. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you are familiar enough AfC acceptance criteria to be reviewing articles? ~Kvng (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear ~Kvng i am reviewing that means i am familiar enough. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts often don't start out looking like other Wikipedia articles. The way they get there is though improvement by the community. The question AfD reviewers should be asking themselves is whether an accepted draft would be likely deleted (rather than improved) by the community. If you are unsure how to answer this question, please spend some time participating at WP:AFD to learn how this decision is made.
In that light, after your decline, I have resubmitted Draft:Gregg Hotel and accepted it. ~Kvng (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kvng you accepted your own article, no one else accepted it. i am not here to argue with you or waste my time talking to you. please carry on your good work. regards. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 03:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was an article that I rescued from WP:G13. ~Kvng (talk) 16:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez

Thank you for creating Joseph Thamby.

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It would be helpful if you could add a secondary source, such as an Main Indian newspaper which would support this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 14:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jeromeenriquez

Thank you for reviewing Draft:Anindya Bakrie. I edited the page few weeks ago and try improve the page by removing VIVA sources (a media company owned by this guy) and none notable family members. Do you have any specific comments on how what I can do to improve it further? In terms of notability I think he has a wide coverage nationally also internationally from WEF, Forbes, Reuters etc. I think it has something to do with the awful copy, but i'd like to know you have specific comments for this, thanks. --Adsfreethanos (talk) 04:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear adsfreethanos, I see that you have worked hard on this article but it would be great if you can keep the article simple and to the point. First point, Your article is a biography but it looks like an advertisement. Second point, most of the references added are in the local language, some references talk about the bakrie group not the individual subject. Please add relevant links, references and clean the article to look like a biography. Show the real coverage about this person in media. Do this and resubmit. Jeromeenriquez (talk)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Wang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wei County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:German Lepcha

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "German Lepcha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Liz, Thank you for reminding and deleting the draft, I had completely forgotten about it. Happy editing. Jeromeenriquez (talk)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

[edit]
Merry Christmas and Happy New year

Hello! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous 2021 on the behalf of Christmas task force of WikiProject Holidays.


"Christmas is not a time nor a season, but a state of mind. To cherish peace and goodwill, to be plenteous in mercy, is to have the real spirit of Christmas!"
-Calvin Coolidge
Quotations related to Calvin Coolidge at Wikiquote



Sent by Path slopu (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Holidays, WikiProject Christianity and their related projects. © Copyleft 2020

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and thank you Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Albert Laberge

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez, I come here after Wikipedia:Teahouse#Review_in_progress_template. Are you still reviewing Draft:Albert Laberge or are you done with it? Thanks, Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC) This talk page is starting to get overly long. Consider Archiving it. [reply]

Thanks for your review!

[edit]

Hello User:Jeromeenriquez and thank you for reviewing my draft of Sheridan Simove. It means a lot to have an evaluation from an experienced creator of new articles. I can see you are extremely active and want to emphasize that I truly appreciate your taking the time to review the draft. DanDavidCook (talk) 16:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please review carefully -regarding Pratishtha Raut

[edit]

Hi, When I checked reference of Pratishtha Raut, they were pointing to wrong links. Also, the information quoted in article and references is different. Please be careful while checking the AfC. I have modified the article for now to match with the references. Regards! nirmal (talk) 00:58, 20 May 2021 (UTC) hi, nirmal Thanks[reply]

Need advice regarding Draft:Shivani_Khetan Rejection

[edit]

Hi, I just checked that you've marked the Draft:Shivani_Khetan as rejected can you please help me out with the draft as all the sources are authenticated and she has enough presence in Google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneha-SIPL (talkcontribs) 05:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sneha-SIPL i reviewed the article once again and checked all the references. All the references has her interview. The content and the references are different. Please understand that only people included on the Wikipedia are those who has achieved something notable. I tried to find some more sources to find about the subject but couldn't find it. Subject is a doctor and a tarot card reader. She started a start up, which isn't notable even. I am proposing it for deletion. You can ask other editors for their opinion. Thanks. Jeromeenriquez (talk)

Sneha-SIPL (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC) Hi, I understand that but she has won awards as mentioned below:[reply]

  1. Awarded Golden Book of World Records for Tarot a healing tool in modern times, as first coffee table book on tarot.
  2. Global Goodwill Ambassador (GGA) program from LinkedIn Company for volunteering program
  3. Peace 2019 International Awards

Kindly help with the article. As she is having notable awards list also please check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitin_Soni how it can be published then I also can find any notable work over there according to your perception.

Dear Sneha-SIPL, i understand your point but please look at the box on top of the article that you are referring to with an exclamation mark. Your article is in for discussion, so let the authorized editors review it and bring it to the main space if it qualifies. i don't want to bring it to the main space because i don't want it to be deleted after few days by some other editor because it doesn't meet notability guidelines for Wikipedia. Jeromeenriquez (talk)

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:HON and MOS:POSTNOM Elizium23 (talk) 02:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Count me in. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 12:41, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Fr. Agnel School, Noida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources establishing notability of the school. GNG is not met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Participation in a research study of Wikipedians

[edit]

Hi Jeromeenriquez,

My name is Lara Yang, and I am a PhD student in Organizational Behavior at Stanford University. As a part of a research study to better understand work dynamics on Wikipedia, our research team is currently conducting interviews with Wikipedians. Because you are an active editor on Wikipedia, we would love to learn more about your work and hear your perspective on how Wikipedia, and open-source communities in general, function to produce and organize high-quality knowledge. We have done our best to learn about the dynamics of collaboration on Wikipedia from secondary sources, which we are hoping to complement with your invaluable first-hand insights.

The interview will take around 45 minutes and be semi-structured in format. Any identifying information in your responses will be kept strictly confidential, and will not be disclosed in the analysis nor the research paper. If you are interested in participating, please email us via the 'Email this user' tool on my user page and suggest a few time slots in the upcoming weeks that work best for you. We will do our best to accommodate your schedule. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to let us know. We look forward to hearing from you.

Best, Lara aka Wanderingpotato (talk) 18:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lara, it’s a great opportunity, I would like to be part of it. Please tell me the time slots available and I will keep myself free for this interview. Thanks. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeromeenriquez,

Awesome! Thank you for your interest. We are quite flexible in terms of scheduling. I can meet this Wednesday and Friday and next week on Tuesday and Thursday from 9am-5pm PST. I will also be available next Wednesday from 12pm-5pm and next Friday from 1pm to 5pm PST. Could you email me at larayang@stanford.edu to let me know what time works best for you so I can send you a calendar invite and an embedded Zoom link for the interview? Thanks!

Best, Lara Wanderingpotato (talk) 19:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Thanks for lending a hand at AfC! S0091 (talk) 22:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 05:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G5 speedy deletion

[edit]

Hello, my understanding of the G5 speedy deletion criteria is that it only applies to pages that are created by the banned/blocked user after their ban or block was instituted. Draft:Choo Mandhirakaali was created before the user was blocked. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, user was blocked because of the same article under suspicion of doing paid promotion. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 10:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I understand now. Please accept my apologies, I was up early where I am. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 13:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edgar Cuntapay Gacutan has been accepted

[edit]
Edgar Cuntapay Gacutan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 07:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions to Raimundus Li Quanzhen

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raimundus Li Quanzhen. Jonathon Phelps (talk) 12:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was still working on the article and saved it by mistake. I have not been involved in any kind of vandalism so far and also have no intentions. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 12:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 20:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez, you say that the sources "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about Buschmann". The Generation Verantwortung book has an entire chapter on Buschmann, and the auto motor and sport sources are primarily about Buschmann as well, so there are not just passing mentions, but actual descriptions of the subject. Please have another look – is there anything else that I could add or improve? I'd appreciate any help. Regards, --Hero4711 (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i did check all the resources, i would encourage you to add some more details and content to make it like a biography. The piece is incomplete. Make some more improvements to it and resubmit. Happy editing. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 05:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you added a "sources exist" template to the new article Hail Storm (Coast Redwood) when you passed it through AfC, possibly you would like to leave a comment at the AfD discussion. --JBL (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

[edit]

Information icon Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Thank you. — hike395 (talk) 07:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt realise and it kept asking me to restore to the version. It was done by mistake but thankyou for fixing it and making me aware of it. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:11:49, 7 January 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by IrfanIzhar

[edit]


I am requesting assistance because I am unable to understand some of the technical terms. Moreover, I am unable to find my article that was rejected. At least I could edit the sources or untrusted citations linked in that article and try to re-submit the same for approval. Even though my content previous was 100% plagiarism-free, I'm still not satisfied with the actual reason for deleting my content. So, I am simply requesting assistance on AFC for Mr. Irfan Izhar. Kindly, help me out.

IrfanIzhar (talk) 07:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, article in discussion was deleted under G-11 section of wikipedia. Please refer to the guidelines posted to you by the reviewer who raised the deletion. If you think article was notewotrth than you can rewrite it again and submit for review. You can also contact the reviewer who proposed it for deletion. Thanks. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Helping with the Gabi DeMartino draft

[edit]

Hello there! I once made a draft for American singer Draft:Gabi DeMartino in May 2021 and got declined by MurielMary (I totally understand why) but I think since I added more sources could you re-review it? Also both members of the Niki and Gabi duo has gone solo in 2019 so I think they need individual articles so it would be more organized and understandable, just like the Chloe x Halle members, if you could help me with making the Gabi DeMartino draft much better to become an actual article it would mean a lot, thank you and have a great day!Gabriella Grande (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would surely see what best i can do. Please remember that the members of the group will only be notable and can be added to Wikipedia if they have done something notable individually. keep writing good articles and submit them. You are doing good job. Happy editing. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hello

[edit]

Nono, this isn't about you, I was discussing some anonymous user whose edits you had reviewed. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you . Jeromeenriquez (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:14:17, 18 January 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Flagship1

[edit]



Flagship1 (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Been thinking about a way forward and could use help. The name in the article shows up at least 6 times in Wikipedia references i.e. state government, federal government, universities. The Assistant Secretary Navy position was held by Teddy Roosevelt and Franklin Roosevelt appointed by President McKinley and Wilson. There is a section in wikipedia named for Assistant Secretaries and another for appointees including this individual. Information submitted was taken from peers, predecessors and successors listed below. Their references are similar in source and were used as a template.

Political appointees were added to wikipedia at time of appointment. Assistant Secretary Charles Williams was overlooked. The following are peers, predecessor and successor. Do you know how wikipedia lists some but not all in similar positions?

Thanks

Peers:

John Henderson (Air Force Asst. Secretary) Alex Beehler (Army Asst. Secretary) Jordan Gillis (Army Asst. Secretary) Greg Slavonic (Navy Asst. Secretary) James Geurts (Navy Asst. Secretary) Thomas Harker (Navy Asst. Secretary) Lucian Niemeyer (Navy Asst. Secretary) Meredith Berger (Navy Asst. Secretary)

When seeking help before submitting for approval I was told Articles about Assistant Secretaries exist because people have created them. An assumption can be made that this level of government appointment qualifies for an article.

Would you reconsider?

Hi, thanks for reviewing a submission January 3. Declining for lack of reliable sources seemed insufficient without knowing history. a number of folks reviewed the submission. suggested i reduce number of sources similar to peer articles. references should have been sufficient. Do you want to see all references for approval? there are multiple references in wikipedia. appreicate your help to finish this article.

[edit]

1. ↑ "Charles Williams, United States Navy, Biography". America's Navy. 1. Southeast Missouri State University graduate college newspaper article (https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=17c98d4384f2083c&attid=0.1&disp=attd&safe=1&zw(https://www.slu/edu) 2. Charles Williams presidential nomination(https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/eight-nominations-one-withdrawal-sent-senate-2/) 3. Charles Williams (http://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/1310) 4. Charles Williams (http://www.executivegov.com/2019/12/retired-rear..) 6. Trump announces pick for top Navy energy, environment post.pdf (http://www.eenews.net/stories/1061653601) https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=17c94cebe9e622b1&attid=0.1&disp=attd&safe=1&zw 7. Charles Williams (http://www.insidedefense.com/document/mcpherson-williams-confirmation-hearing) 8. Charles Williams (http://www.msccn.org/uploads/2/5/8/2/25822220/chuck_williams.pdf) 9. Liberty University (http://www.coursehero.com/file/75130637/Generations)-Assesment-3docx 10. Charles Williams (http://capitalinnovators.com/charles-williams) 11. Charles Williams Hall of Fame 1968 (http://www.ritenour.k12.mo.us/page/452) 12. Charles Williams USS St. Louis Commissioning speaker (https://news.usni.org/2020/08/11/video-littoral-combat-ship-uss-st-louis-comissioning-ceremony 13. Interview for PBS special https://www.ninepbs.org/blogs/program-highlights/uss-st-louis-centuries-of-service/ 14. Defense minister, embassy and Omani Admiral in Chief RNO commander receives US official - Oman Observer https://www.omanobserver.om/article/7116/Local/rno... RNO Commander meets with US Navy official - Oman Observer https://www.omanobserver.om/article/7091/Local/rno... 15. Assistant Secretary Williams visits U.S. installations in the U.S., Central Command, Europe and Africa. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2366261/assistant-secretary-of-the-navy-for-energy-installations-environment-visits-sou/ https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2329431/asn-for-energy-installations-environment-visits https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2438028/asst-secnav-for-energy-installations-environment-visits-overseas-installations/ 16. Charles Williams Installation Annual Report (https://www.secnav.navy.mil/eie/Documents/2020_Navy_Financial_Report_PRINT_FILE-BLEED.pdf) 17.Trump Taps Missouri Vet to Lead Navy ... - Defense Communities (https://defensecommunities.org/2019/12/trump-taps...) 18. Charles Williams livid over housing https://www.militarytimes.com/pay-benefits/2020/01/16/navy-housing-nominee-livid-about-housing-problems/ 19. Charles Williams (http://www.independentsentinel.com/88-former) 20. Charles Williams https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2020/03/06/as-pentagon-vacancies-peak-time-runs-out-to-fill-jobs/ 21. Charles Williams Senate Confirmation hearing (https://www.13newsnow.com/article/news/national/military-news/pentagon-nominees-questioned-on-housing-suicides-shipyards-climate-change/291-36f29958-4530-42d6-b878-afe73155e9dd) 22. Charles Williams Senate hearing congressional record (pdf) https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-166/daily-digest/page/D59 https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/press-releases/sasc-advances-civilian-military-nominations-021320 23. Charles Williams Armed Services hearing January 16,2020 (https://www.c-span.org/search/?sdate=01%2F16%2F2020&edate=01%2F16%2F2020&congressSelect=&yearSelect=&searchtype=Videos&sort=Most+Recent+Event&text=0) 24. Charles Williams Senate Event Schedule https://www.congress.gov/event/116th-congress/senate-event/326925?s=2&r=10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flagship1 (talkcontribs) 16:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leah Croucher

[edit]

See User_talk:Gråbergs_Gråa_Sång#Is_this_notable and this news article.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Francis Qingqi Cui

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jeromeenriquez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francis Qingqi Cui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jermoeenriqueez, I was just sifting through the maths drafts to see where I can improve sourcing, and noticed that you declined the submission of Draft:Lentz's algorithm on the basis of its content being unverified. I am not quite sure what you mean, since I have been able to verify the content on the page using the sources provided by the in-line citations. Could you be somewhat more specific to help other editors improve the submission? Is it that you think more in-depth coverage would be needed for WP:GNG)? Thank you very much for your time! Felix QW (talk) 12:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s what I meant, in depth coverage. Thanks Jeromeenriquez (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

[edit]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Laptopinmyhands (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sashai

[edit]

About six months ago you declined Draft:Sashai do you consider it sufficiently improved now? Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 08:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I will have to see it. Thanks Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article St. Mary's School, Chandigarh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only primary sources provided. Fails WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:36:18, 5 April 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Viv moira

[edit]


You have rejected my article suggestion by copy-pasting a template without further explanation. Could you let me know in some specifics why the various secondary published books and academic papers for this article do not qualify? I have checked Wikipedias "notability" and source guidelines many times by now. I have talked to people on Wiki IRC multiple times, who think this article would qualify but could only speculate on why an admin might have rejected it. The occult domain (for which there is an existing project) is small, it is rare that anyone is mentioned in secondary not self-published sources or academic papers at all, but this person is. Note that in parallel there are articles like Lionel_Snell .

I only wanted to contribute a stub article about this person originally. I nevertheless lately came to the conclusion that Wikipedia admins seem to have strong objections against genuine articles written by regular people in their freetime, but don't even raise a eyebrow when marketing departments of Monsanto, talking heads on YouTube, the pharmaceutical or the music industry write expansive articles full biased information promoting their harmful or stupefying products here. I am very disappointed by this procedure.

Viv moira (talk) 11:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I didn't reject your article because of anything personal. You can resubmit it, I haven't deleted your article. I didn't find it suitable to be added to Wikipedia for now. Thanks Jeromeenriquez (talk) 14:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you be more specific on the why please? There is an active project on improving the (indeed not great) articles on occultism. Viv moira (talk) 15:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed regarding recently declined AfC

[edit]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

Thank you for the speedy review of my AfC on History of Moradabad. I respect your decision, but I'd like to humbly point out a couple of reasons why I thought a separate article makes more sense on the topicː

1- The first reason was the difference of geographical area covered in both articles. The Moradabad article covers information relevant to the main Moradabad city, so the history section there (which has also been written by me after submitting this article for review) focuses more on the historical aspects of the city region alone. This History of Moradabad article, on the other hand, deals with the history of Mordabad district, which consists not only of the Mordabad city but other smaller towns and some villages around it that collectively form the larger district. It also includes history of some other areas which are separate districts now but were part of the Moradabad district until recently, such as Amroha district and Sambhal district.

2- The second why I thought that it makes more sense to have this as a separate article was because of the depth of coverage. The history section that I've written for the Moradabad page has about 1,500 words only because it also needs to cover a lot of other relevant information about the city without overwhelming the reader. So I thought that if someone wants to read in-depth about the history of Moradabad, then let's create a separate article for them and add a "Main article" wikilink at the top of history section to that article. That's why I created this article, which is more than 5,000̟ words.

I personally felt that at 5,300 words it had sufficient content to pass the need of a separate article. Maybe I was wrong or I missed something as I'm a farily new Wikipedian. It will be helpful if you can recommend me some guidelines that provide some sort of checklist for the criteria of "sufficient content". I'll go through it and edit my article accordingly before re-submitting it for a review. Thank you. Ashishb04 (talk) 12:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. Thank you for your work on Linus Neli. Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Please avoid WP:REFBOMB; a "further reading" section would be preferred.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 08:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Broc: Thank You. Please add anything and improve the article. I really appreciate ypur help. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 08:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Andrea Lembo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Andrea Lembo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeromeenriquez, reverted your review and AfD nom because only articles can be nominated for deletion and this is a draft. Also, the draft has several sources with in-depth coverage about the company so not sure why you declined. S0091 (talk) 19:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Josei Tennō

[edit]

Hiya. I see you declined Draft:Josei Tennō because we already have Empress of Japan. Empress of Japan mainly focuses on the Empress Consorts rather than regnant. Also Japanese Wikipedia has a page for both. I think it should be reconsidered for submission. Many thanks! Camillz (talk) 20:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A follow up because I forgot to include, but would it be ok to resubmit the draft? Camillz (talk) 20:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
resubmit Jeromeenriquez (talk) 21:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hey, please resubmit the article and let me know i will review it. Please improve article bit more and give more content and refernces. dont copy paste. let me know if i can help. thanks Jeromeenriquez (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
alright thank you so much. Camillz (talk) 07:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hey, i accepted your article 'Nunasokonakatsu-hime'. please improve other articles as well and let me know what i can help with. regards Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I say my other drafts are fine. Although maybe Draft:Prince Anahobe needs some polishing. As for Draft:Josei Tennō I'll see what I can do to fix it! Camillz (talk) 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe before I decide to edit anything look over Draft:Josei Tennō once more. Just to see if it needs editing. Camillz (talk) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a bit more information, would it be acceptable to put back up for review? Camillz (talk) 17:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hey, resubmit the article for review Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a bunch! Camillz (talk) 13:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome, please keep improving your articles and keep writing more. best of luck. Reach me whenever you need any help. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
will do! Also it's resubmitted. Camillz (talk) 19:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Josei Tennō

[edit]

hiya! Thanks for accepting it! Could you link Josei Tennō to the wiki data for it? https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5374675#sitelinks-wikipedia That's it! I'm unsure how to add it myself. Camillz (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Liu Cheng-chung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rejecting this draft seems very odd, frankly. All the many refs are in French. Do you actually read French? If, not you shouln't have attempted a review. Johnbod (talk) 04:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Marilou Schultz

[edit]

Please take another look at Draft:Marilou Schultz. Most of the references are either books from reputable publishers or newspapers of record, so I think the references pass the reliable sources test. LeapTorchGear (talk) 13:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Fatima Convent School, Ghaziabad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Only primary sources provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]