User talk:KBWalsh

Welcome!

Hello, KBWalsh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fabricationary 02:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Kimberley Walsh. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fabricationary 02:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from Kimberley Walsh

Whether you are really Kimberley Walsh or not, no one 'owns' a Wikipedia page. If there are factual errors on the page, you can remove those (with a note on the talk page explaining why). You've left only one note in the talk space, and it doesn't explain which specific pieces of information on the page are untrue. But what you're doing now- removing almost all of the page's content' is considered vandalism, and you can find yourself blocked from contributing to Wikipedia for doing it. -FisherQueen 13:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

If you want to talk with other editors about the Kimberley Walsh article, use the talk page at Talk:Kimberley Walsh- that way, anyone who works on the article will see what you have to say, where I'm pretty much the only person who reads my talk page. I don't see anything there that looks like an 'attack page,' and most of it seems to be cited, but if there are factual inaccuracies, or important details missing, they should be corrected. It's just not okay to cut the article back to a stub, especially without giving specific reasons for your objections. -FisherQueen 19:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way

If you haven't found them already, here's a link to the policy on biographies of living people, which includes some information for people who are the subjects of biographies. I honestly don't see the 'attack page' in Kimberley Walsh, but I am wrong sometimes, so feel free to use the information there in whatever way is useful. -FisherQueen 19:21, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Please read our conflict of interest and autobiography policies. Take them into account when editing here. Being the person who is the subject of an article gives you no extra authority. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 03:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 72.177.190.208 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Yamla 23:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are still blocked, please re-request an unblock or contact me directly. --Yamla 23:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

KBWalsh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

72.177.190.208 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Valguire". The reason given for Valguire's block is: "Sockpuppet of banned user".

Blocking administrator: Centrx (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Account appears to be used only for vandalism. -- Yamla 04:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

If you continue to ignore the community and keep blanking the User:Kimberley Walsh article you will be blocked. What's more, if you wish to continue using the username KBWalsh while editing the Kimberley Walsh article then you will need to prove you are really her, or have your username blocked for resembling a celebrity. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 00:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I am blocking this account indefinitely until you can demonstrate you are really Kimberley Walsh. This is being done due to our username policy which forbids names that resemble that of a celebrity unless you are said celebrity.

This block will be lifted if you can demonstrate you are Kimberley Walsh. You are also welcome to create a new username. This is done to prevent damage to the identity of the celebrity in quesstion. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 00:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]