User talk:Kaushwiki

This is Kaushwiki's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Kaushwiki! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kaushwiki/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kaushwiki/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaushwiki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Postage stamp citations

Thank you for your additions of postage stamp information to various articles. Unfortunately, all your additions are incorrectly cited. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for accepted methods. Please correct the additions you have already made.—Anita5192 (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected your additions at Miklós Zrínyi, so you can use my changes as a model. I would recommend also looking at Help:Footnotes & Wikipedia:Citation templates. Peaceray (talk) 15:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the information pages linked on this page. I appreciate that you are making an effort to fix your postage stamp citations, but trying to make them look like proper citations without actually fixing them, as you did at Loránd Eötvös, is not helpful.—Anita5192 (talk) 16:08, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honors: Postage stamp issued

Hello, Kaushwiki. You have new messages at WP:TH.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Kaushwiki! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Postage stamp additions

Hi,

please in the future do by this format the additions:

TEXT<ref>SOURCE</ref>

Put this code in, since the format you do with "SUP" and interventions in the references section that are generated automatically is problematic. Just see how I corrected the the Attila József article, as I did it plenty of other articles you edited. So, just write the information, then using the "ref" tag and put inside the source, everything will be genrated automatically. Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 21:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks KIENGIRI for valuable suggestions. I tried to follow them thereafter. But then two messages by seniors were depressing to me. I was committing mistakes when I thought I was correcting! But I gather that, after all, I am not exactly being kicked out. There is scope for correcting. My mistakes were not intentional but out of ignorance. I definitely want to contribute positively however stereotype it may seem. Honors to an existing Wikipedia subject needs to be mentioned. And being a philatelist, I decided to mention Postage stamps issued. I am doing this in good faith and cannot think of disrupting the files. The suffix of URLs was intentionally left out as the remaining part was as good for an independent verification. Henceforth the suffix will be present in my edits if all of you permit me to edit. I came to think that my edits are not wanted / tolerated. The last two comments received by me (by email also) are in a language not known to me; will some body translate into English? My question: Should I continue with all the suggestions by senior editors? or is it a way to show me the door? Kaushwiki (talk) 12:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)17.31 IST 29. 7.18[reply]

Ha, thanks for finally responding. If you do it this way, it is probably ok, and no doors will be shown, no worries. - DVdm (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have two suggestions:

If you are editing the wikitext, use "Citer". from Wikimedia Toolforge. Dropping in a URL like https://colnect.com/en/stamps/stamp/178802-Zr%C3%ADnyi_Ilona_1643-1703_defender_of_Munk%C3%A1cs_Fortress-Army_Day-Hungary& submitting yields this Named reference:

<ref name="Colnect">{{cite web | title=Stamp: Zrínyi Ilona (1643-1703) defender of Munkács Fortress (Hungary) (Army Day) Mi:HU 1271,Sn:HU 1022,Yt:HU 1060,AFA:HU 1243 | website=Colnect | url=https://colnect.com/en/stamps/stamp/178802-Zr%C3%ADnyi_Ilona_1643-1703_defender_of_Munk%C3%A1cs_Fortress-Army_Day-Hungary | access-date=2018-07-30}}</ref>

. The citation portion of the reference would then appearslike this:

"Stamp: Zrínyi Ilona (1643-1703) defender of Munkács Fortress (Hungary) (Army Day) Mi:HU 1271,Sn:HU 1022,Yt:HU 1060,AFA:HU 1243". Colnect. Retrieved 2018-07-30.

I think that you would need to edit out the extraneous "(Army Day) Mi:HU 1271,Sn:HU 1022,Yt:HU 1060,AFA:HU 1243" from the title field, but you get the idea.

If you are using VisualEditor, you can use the “Cite Add a Citation automatic option to drop in the full URL then generate the citation. Make sure that you choose the Insert button before trying to save it! After inserting it, you can then click on it & choose Edit to tweak it, remove extraneous characters, add or delete parameter fields, etc.

Peaceray (talk) 18:42, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: most of your edits have been undone now. Please, before you add more content of that type, have a very careful look at the messages here above. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 14:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Ignác Martinovics. - DVdm (talk) 12:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

don't embarrass "the boys"

kuttha na vaittha. menu pattha thu sochda aheh thorai bundai ah.

putthara mahe thunu ick vari eheh gal kaina: chup kar.

bewakoof.

useee ahei kaam nai balahndaia. thu mara gaal samjaia, kutthaia hindustani dha bhacha? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.184.153.186 (talk) 01:59, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ick hor gaal

aheh thorai bundhai nai ah, samjaia?

thu koi nee cheej hagaia. merah PAAKA dhost both gusai hundaia, thu ahai kaam karda.

mahe thunu ick gaal kai sackda: botth JORR de sochla, hindustani. botth jor de sochla. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.184.153.186 (talk) 02:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - DVdm (talk) 08:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DVdm. I want to redo all the previous edits the right way. setting the mistakes right. Can I do it? or should forget about them? Kaushwiki (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)kaushwiki 30.7.18 18.35[reply]

Please indent your talk page messages as outlined in wp:THREAD and wp:INDENT — See Help:Using talk pages. Thanks.

As I said above, if you can do it this way, it is probably ok. Do not forget the https-prefix. Try a few to begin with, and I'll have a look. - DVdm (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dvdm. I made a few edits today. Will you please tell weather it is right?Kaushwiki (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2018 (UTC)kaushwiki 1.Aug.18. 18.32 IST[reply]

Please indent your talk page messages as outlined in wp:THREAD and wp:INDENT — See Help:Using talk pages.

I have only checked this one and this one, and they look very bad. Please have a careful look at the results. The links work now, but you have added badly formed English sentences, and the spacing is wrong. See for corrected spacing in what user KIENGIR (talk · contribs) corrected to this edit that you just made.

Try to make edits allong the lines explained above in the section "Postage stamp additions". - DVdm (talk) 13:35, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the edit that you made here produces a very bad result. This is not a proper English sentence. Do you realise that? Do you know how sentences are supposed to be constructed in English? Could you please consider contributing to the Wikipedia of your own first language, as opposed to this one? - DVdm (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

R E T I R E D

--Kaushwiki (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)kaushwiki 9.8.2018 14 40 IST[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kaushwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]