User talk:Limefrost Spiral

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of GoldDragon (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome

Hello, Limefrost Spiral, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:32, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arsène Wenger. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Footballistically (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Affleck link

Please do not add that article about Ben Affleck everywhere. It is not necessary to support any claims being made in either article where you have added it and the unnecessary repetition is spammy.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 19:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arsène Wenger. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Footballistically (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article was stable until you messed it up. Why don't you explain your reasons for changing on the talkpage instead of assuming it's your way or the highway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footballistically (talk • contribs) 01:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, I'm 117Avenue. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jack Layton seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 03:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arsène Wenger. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wenger

Without wanting to get into another edit war and agreeing that Bergkamp and Viera are worth mention in the foreigners section, repeating their signings and overlinking their names constitutes as WP:OVERLINK. Plus references are reused for no reason, but to add more bandwidth. Hence why I tightened the sentence to "However, Wenger has been criticised for setting a trend of fielding many foreign players." Sometimes less is more. Footballistically (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, could you please leave comments on the talkpage on why you think the article needs change before adding Bare URLs and WP:OVERLINKS. Footballistically (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IPhone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LTE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of www.company7.com

At Bösendorfer‎, I removed your addition of links to the website http://www.company7.com. The website is self-published and thus unreliable. Please see the guideline at WP:Reliable sources. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steinway promotion coupled with Bösendorfer criticism

Per WP:NPOV, please refrain from promoting Steinway and criticizing Bösendorfer, as you did at Imperial Bösendorfer (piano). If you persist, you may be blocked. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rachmaninoff

Hi. I have reverted your edits pertaining to the Rachmaninoff Third Piano Concerto. The Discussion page goes over this in some detail. Perahia's comments in the liner notes of Horowitz's Last Recording is simply passing along a legend that has no basis in historical fact.THD3 (talk) 13:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

I feel that you are starting an edit war on the Feature phone article, so I have opted to report it. Ropo153 (talk) 05:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Diablo II. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sudo Ghost 03:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tie Fighter

Please do not continue to restore deleted material from the Star Wars: TIE Fighter article without discussion. The new craft section was removed because it is excessive, unnecessary detail. If you want to discuss changes, please do so at the talk page for that article - there is already a section about the changes I made that included removing the New Craft section. Some guy (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hasan Salihamidžić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roberto Carlos

Vezina Trophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NHLPA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copy pasting content

It appears that you may be copy pasting content from websites to Wikipedia articles. Is this true? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canadian Chinese cuisine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richmond Hill and Markham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobby Clarke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Premier League

Please stop making wholesale reverts to the Premier League article. The Premier League is not a Welsh league, it merely has (or is soon to have) two Welsh teams in it; it is governed by the English authorities, so should be considered wholly an English league – the Welsh authorities have nothing to do with it. Furthermore, please stop expanding the top goalscorers table to the top 30. 30 is far too big a number to list, 10 should suffice. – Pee Jay 21:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1998 FA Cup Final

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Footballistically (talk) 10:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Mourinho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rafael Benítez

Hey, I noticed you reintroduced your edit that included a lot of WP:FANCRUFT and WP:LONGQUOTEs that end up giving undue weight to single events, and get into too much detail about accomplishments that aren't specifically Benitez's. Feel free to leave a message in the article talk page, but please ease off on simply reintroducing your edits without providing an explanation and discussing them. --Mosmof (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vezina Trophy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tim Thomas and NHLPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to 50 goals in 50 games

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Amit (talk) 03:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Championship ring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

{{unblock-auto|1=142.205.241.254|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "BeenKoo". The reason given for BeenKoo's block is: "

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jorge Mendes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falcao (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 82.132.213.97 (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amusement park, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Amusement park, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 82.132.213.97 (talk) 18:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amusement park, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. 82.132.230.144 (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Amusement park. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 82.132.230.144 (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Vehicle audio. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you for your recent edits to Vehicle audio, however the information you added was not referenced and may be challenged. I see you have been repeatedly asked not to add unreferenced material to articles. It's easy to find references, and you can find a guide on how to reference here: WP:CITE. Please note that continuing to add unreferenced material may lead to you being banned. teb00007 ^{Talk • Contributions} 18:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry I should have been clearer. I noticed you have referenced material further down in the article, but you also added material to the lead section which was completely unreferenced, and may be challenged. I used a level 3 warning because you had already received warnings about unsourced material this month, but I really just wanted to let you know that what you added may be challenged. Also, please remember to always end your comments on talk pages with the four tildes (~~~~) as this adds your signature to the comments. --teb00007 ^{Talk • Contributions} 19:08, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think my changes to the lead section were significant, it was just adding a few other commonly-used terms for car audio and other minor tweaks. As that lead section was completely unsourced anyway, it is a somewhat free-for-all as long as the material isn't controversial.Limefrost Spiral (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the content there seems like opinion or original research without adequate references (e.g. "Modern vehicle manufacturing nearly always includes a complete system" and "there is a large market of products sold directly to consumers to replace, upgrade, or expand the vehicle's stock sound system capabilities" read like original research and may be challenged). It is important to include references in the lead (see WP:LEADCITE) to support Wikipedia's policy of verifiability. If you are able to, please add references whenever you're editing the lead section. --teb00007 ^{Talk • Contributions} 19:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add these blurbs to the main section, I only reduced the number of paragraphs from 5 to 3. Limefrost Spiral (talk) 19:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scharnhorst class

Hello. Please stop adding the nonsense about them being in the tradition of the German WWI-era battlecruisers. That was not the reason the 11.1" guns were chosen. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 19:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Osborne effect may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

When [[Sega]] began publicly discussing their [[Dreamcast|next-generation system (eventually released as the Dreamcast]], barely two years after launching the [[Sega Saturn|Saturn]],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Diesel engine, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Hans Langsdorff

Your recent editing history at Hans Langsdorff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 23:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Loudness war, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please do not use unreliable sources such as a wiki. Binksternet (talk) 02:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Loudness war (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Darkness, One by One, Yes and Slipknot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Langsdorff edits

Limefrost, instead of edit warring over this minor change, I suggest you put in your two-bits to justify the change at Talk:Hans Langsdorff#Edit observing coincidental events. If you can convince other editors that the change is proper, all will be happy and everything will go well. In the alternative, you might try another way of adding this coincidence info. (Like a footnote or alternative phrasing, or something.) But without some discussion you will only get into trouble for disruptive editing. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 04:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited President (corporate title), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Apple Store may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] with wood tables and a backlit Apple Logo, which presently showcases iPads and Mac computers (iPods have their own dedicated space in the MP3 player aisle, while iPhones are displayed in the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Samsung may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Retail Store

Hey Limefrost Spiral, I reverted your recent changes to the Apple Store since it would change the article name by stealth. The correct way to do this is by starting a discussion on the article talk page and getting a consensus for a Requested Move. The store may well be a retail store, in fact only an idiot would argue otherwise, but if the Common Name is Apple Store, then policy is on the side of leaving it be. You're best starting a discussion though to get opinions. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 16:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Limefrost, you leave me no choice but to start a requested move. You can't just change an article by stealth and keep reverting. I don't intend to revert again but since you are pushing ahead anyway let this be a warning about the 3 revert warning and edit warring. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 09:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Diamond (banker), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mervyn King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hudson's Bay Centre may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

servlet/StoreLocatorDisplayView?catalogId=10652&langId=-24&storeId=10701#storeservices]</ref>). The mall contains over 45 specialty shops, boutiques, services and eateries. The complex also

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tiff Macklem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Dodge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. A number of your edits do not consist of encyclopedic material, but original opinions and research. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 360

When there is disagreement over recent content changes in an article, the typical course of action is to revert back to the previous version until the dispute is settled on the article's talk page. There are issues with your proposed changes: grammar, some peacock statements, undue weight (needs some negative criticism for balance), etc. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Desktop computer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

2011 onwards), which manufacturers believe may revive the PC market<ref name="extremetech.com"/>) rather than desktops.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Xbox 360 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GoneIn60 (talk) 19:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and you're edit warring at Wii U as well. There's also warnings about edit warring up and down this talk page. Last warning, any more of this, and you're blocked. Start talking things over on the talk page and following WP:BRD. Sergecross73 msg me 02:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV: League of Legends

Hey there. Your addition to the page League of Legends involved the perpetuation of a column, which constituted an opinion, without anything new in the way of encyclopedic value. The sentence has since been removed, but you should be pleased to know that the relevant and neutral information is still included, such as the fact that the game is still the most popular PC title in the world. Kind regards. DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 06:40, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 360

We've reverted each other a few times now and we should have discussed this a while back. I'm not disputing your source or the information itself, but the way its written makes no sense to me. If you could maybe reword it or clarify what it is you mean that would help. Samwalton9 (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have term that is more descriptive, by all means you are welcome to reword it, I just didn't like it being entirely removed. The sources have mentioned the Xbox 360 as a living room hub for games, movies, TV shows, etc.Limefrost Spiral (talk) 21:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine and inclusion of material to that affect is entirely debatable, I was just reverting because your wording didn't make sense. Perhaps change environment to entertainment? It would read fine to me then. Samwalton9 (talk) 21:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greatly appreciated, have made the change. I remember that one source did use environment in the sense that you could sync a smartphone or laptop to the Xbox 360, but entertainment is more easily understood.Limefrost Spiral (talk) 22:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of GoldDragon (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|This anon user (99.224.51.134) has been trolling me all the time, and he has been reverting my previous edits just for the sake of doing so (for instance the issue over "dumbphone" in feature phone), why is he/she allowed to get away with it? I've never used multiple accounts for voting, giving the impressing of multiple editors during an edit war, etc. And haven't my edits been mostly constructive (I've been thanked for Xbox 360 and desktop computer)? ~~~~}}