User talk:MakersBreath

Legendary Moonlight Sculptor

Hi MakersBreath. I know you didn't ask for feedback when requesting an assessment of Legendary Moonlight Sculptor, but I would recommend you add an book infobox and expand the lead paragraph of the article as recommended by WP:NOVEL here. I think adding more context about the book/series will bump the article up to C-class. Best, Lenoresm (talk) 20:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lenoresm, Thanks a lot for the feedback. I really appreciate it. We're all here to learn, after all. Thanks for the input, and yes, I'll work on it through the days! :)

Cheers, MakersBreath (talk) 04:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

An article on Marlabs was already deleted earlier this year, citing lack of notability. Kleuske (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kleuske: Is it okay if I try to establish notability? I already noticed that the page was deleted thrice for bad referencing, but I think I can do a better job. Recently, the National Association of Software and Services Companies (Nasscom) awarded them with the AI Game Changer Award for 2018. New technologies are something I follow closely, and given that this is a next generation technology with significant potential to revolutionize future processes, it makes sense to identify notable players in the game. In fact, they were also shortlisted for AI innovation around deep learning by The AIconics. If it doesn't qualify, when I'm close to completion, I'll take it down myself. I think I can make a case! :) MakersBreath (talk) 05:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marlabs Logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marlabs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marlabs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlabs (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UnstableAngina (talk) 04:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marlabs Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marlabs Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ITC Infotech (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:SOLUTIONS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ITC Infotech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ITC Infotech, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MakersBreath! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ITC Infotech

Hello, MakersBreath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ITC Infotech, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ITC Infotech

Hello, MakersBreath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ITC Infotech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]