User talk:V-train

Collapsed airport destination lists

Ok, I think this is fixed now at Manchester Airport. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Durn it

Sorry, those both looked vandalous at first. I should have checked your record closer before reverting. I'll stay out of your way now. joshschr (talk) 19:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DL LAX-EZE

Los Angeles is listed as a destination for Delta on Ministro Pistarini International Airport and it hasn't been removed yet. Bucs2004 (talk) 20:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You removed information that you claim to be a person's opinion, but really are facts!

User: Native94080

Can you by any chance block this user from editing for good, because he is starting to get on my nerve over the edits on the SFO article, and Millbrae Stations. I've been trying to tell him, it is too much information, and also unnecessary but he doesn't seem to listen. SFOetthekid (talk) 22:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't know that. But thanks for letting me know who I can talk to about that.SFOetthekid (talk) 03:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arkanov15, Arkanov92, Vitrox92

Are you an administrator? Can you please get rid of user Arkanov15. More background info is on WP:Airports' talk page. HkCaGu (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smarte Carte/baggage carts not allowed on BART.

I need an answer to my question in Talk:San Francisco International Airport (BART station). Please answer, if you may. Native94080 (talk) 07:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Native94080[reply]

San Francisco International Airport (BART station)

San Francisco International Airport (BART station) - Thanks for your choice of words. More clear now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Native94080 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rental Car Center

Please check this website, which verifies the information that you removed. [1]

You know what....I think I must be editing Wikipedia too often and for too many different reasons. I should be editing Wikitravel more often. Native94080 (talk) 09:25, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Native94080[reply]

Um, to reply to your comment on User talk:Native94080 about the Rental Car Center, it is impossible to go to the Rental Car Center by CAR if you were going to the Rental Car Center to GET a CAR in the first place. —Kurykh 09:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it was in the general case of accessing the Rental Car Center, then yes, you would be correct. —Kurykh 21:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"V-train"?

Just to change the subject a bit.

I was wondering what the name "V-train" means? Because it seems like you are more proficient in the knowledge of personal vehicle transportation, as opposed to the use of public transportation, given your views on using BART between Millbrae and SFO, knowing how to access the Rental Car Center from SFO, etc. Native94080 (talk) 10:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Native94080[reply]

Smallville

Oops..lol, thanks for catching my mistake. The user had added the info before and they didn't have a source, and I didn't notice it the second time that they added the information. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Most Phallic Building contest

An article that you have been involved in editing, Most Phallic Building contest, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Phallic Building contest. Thank you. faithless (^speak) 08:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to discussion about possible COI of editors

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:United_States_presidential_election%2C_2008#Possible_COI_of_two_editors --70.11.142.4 (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

peer review

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 04:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Howard vandal

You gave a warning to a guy who won't stop placing a stolen image in place of a free image of the baseball player Ryan Howard, but he won't stop. Will you please ban him? His name is (I think) PhilliesFan100. Thanks, Googie man (talk) 02:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this guy has been at it *all day*. Anything you can do would be great! Best, Googie man (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2CA vandal

Just in case you didn't notice, I got TwoCeeGay blocked for username violations. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 08:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing valid links

V-train, please stop erasing valid links and information from the KLR650 motorcycle article on wiki. Referenced here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawasaki_KLR650 It appears one or two individuals are removing pertinent links, and you are only supporting their efforts. I do hope this message is in the correct area. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guest2610 (talk • contribs) 09:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the head's up, I was typing up the 3RR when I saw your message. Good call. Snowfire51 (talk) 09:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your help with the Ryan Howard vandal - the person finally got the point! Best, Googie man (talk) 20:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forum links on KLR650 page

How are the links you added not forums? It is clearly a community. Daedalus (talk) 21:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand the us of a talk page Trainster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sobrante Park, Oakland, California

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sobrante Park, Oakland, California, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sobrante Park, Oakland, California. Thank you. Cholga^talK! 00:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Begin/End Dates

Hello. I know WP:AIRPORTS says not to have begin/end dates for seasonal service, but I believe that is only referring to existing seasonal service. Many of the flights for which you removed the begin dates are new flights, as in they haven't existed before and are only beginning this year and when they do begin they will be seasonal (I hope that makes sense). I reverted your edit at the EWR page because the reference I included with the destination states (and I know for a fact) that the flight is beginning for the first time this year. I don't know the status of the other flights you changed. Regards, NcSchu_(Talk) 16:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I also amended the flyglobespan entry on the Manchester Airport page to maintain the begin date for Calgary, as this is the first time the route will operate (rather than Hamilton and Vancouver which are recurring seasonal routes as they operated last year). Like User:NcSchu I don't believe the project guidelines are meant to be interpreted so rigidly and generally refer to existing seasonal services. For "first-time" seasonal routes I believe a begin date is also acceptable. Thanks. SempreVolando (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scott A. Brown

I think you are the only person besides me who got the "Why do you hate Scott A. Brown". You have any idea why? Mm40 (talk) 23:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks.[reply]

San Jose Sharks

Was there any particular reason you reverted my edit adding the division title, or was that just an error? (Admittedly I wasn't logged in when I made it...) LondonStatto (talk) 14:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey V-Train, quick question for you. Could you explain why OTL/SOL's are white, while OTW/SOW's are green? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bumjubeo (talk • contribs) 02:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OS X 10.5 edits?

V-Train, why are repeatedly deleting my edits under criticisms of mac OS 10.5 wi-fi issues? these ARE legitimate problems/concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Merkinator (talk • contribs) 02:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Universities Debating Championship

User:JJJ999 (sometimes editing as 122.148.218.27) is again using a Wikipedia article to make personal attacks against someone he doesn't like while claiming his comments are justified by dubious sources, just as he did during the Australian Capital Territory Debating Union dispute which we were both also involved in last year. You may want to have a look at Talk:Asian Universities Debating Championship and see if you have any comments. Purple Watermelon (talk) 07:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"This is not a rumor site"

Be that as it may, the purpose of an encyclopaedia is to provide information for the masses. Surely many people will want to know what is expected as a successor to Mac OS X 10.5? Surely rumors of the future are as important as truths of the past; "Many believe such and such will come about in the future..." should be just as valid in an encyclopaedia article as any proven fact. --Samballance (talk) 21:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WNHU

I was working on cleaning up articles related to University of New Haven and came across WNHU and found some issues. I tagged the article and was hoping I could get your thoughts on it. Also, please see Talk:WNHU. Thanks! -- Roarke Stratton (talk) 09:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 05:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, V-train. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, V-train. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, V-train. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you back

Hope all is well, look forward to you being back in the saddle. Cheers. Jmg38 (talk) 04:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]