Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Biersack
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Andrew Biersack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod for BLP with no sources was contested without anyone having added a source. Noformation Talk 20:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I think I may have been justified in restoring the prod, but I have read before that a page should only be prod'd once and I'm not sure if there's an exception for BLP violations. Noformation Talk 22:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. ProdBLP is a "sticky" prod that can be replaced if it is removed without sources being added. But there are plenty of other reasons to delete this entry, this person is not notable, there has never been a good claim of individual notability in any of the versions of this entry. The original version Andy Six has served on and off as a redirect to this person's band, but it gets persistently un-redirected, despite a lack of both good refs and individual notability. So delete or at least redirect + protect. Hairhorn (talk) 00:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please also delete (or protect) the duplicate entries Andy Six and Andy Sixx which are currently both redirects. Hairhorn (talk) 00:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the information. Maybe protecting all the redirects would be a good idea. If this person ever does become more notable then perhaps someone can request to remove protection, but right now it seems that these titles are more trouble than they are worth. Noformation Talk 00:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please also delete (or protect) the duplicate entries Andy Six and Andy Sixx which are currently both redirects. Hairhorn (talk) 00:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.