Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behind the Name

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the Name

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable website, fails WP:NWEB, no meaningful coverage CUPIDICAE💕 14:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All content must meet inclusion criteria, which this does not. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking, which this does not. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While Alexa ratings are sometimes predictive of notability, they do not connote notability and are not reliable in terms of predictiveness of finding significant coverage in reliable, third party sources. Draft space is not intended as permanent storage of pages that might or might not be notable. The page or a draft can be recreated if sufficient sourcing can be found. At the time of this writing, such is still lacking. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify again (Draft:Behind the Name). This "encyclopedia of names" is notable, just see this link, it is also a serious one that does in-depth research into its subject area as you can see here. It just needs more time to become a passable article. Cordially, History DMZ ^{(HQ) † (wire)} 02:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of those awards make it notable. Further, there's no actual coverage and nothing that meets NWEB. CUPIDICAE💕 12:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they do. The mentions/awards on USA Today, Yahoo! and Britannica.com make it notable. See also its Alexa Global Ranking at #20,482 which is quite decent and the equivalent of, for example, Eurosport (see its own global ranking almost at #20,000). I see no harm in re-draftifying. Cheers, History DMZ ^{(HQ) † (wire)} 23:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nika2020 (talk) 11:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Devoke water 17:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW and GNG. Zero secondary sources. Bearian (talk) 14:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.