Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belle Johnson
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. GedUK 15:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Belle Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to meet notability guidelines for musicians; author also appears to have a WP:COI (read Update below). OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 10:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 12:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - at least in its current form. The article is just a promo piece right now, of the type that belongs in a social networking site and not in an encyclopedia. Her associations with famous musicians might lead to notability if there is coverage in reliable sources, but most of what I'm finding are self-built promotional and networking pages. See criterion #1 of WP:BAND including footnotes 1 and 3. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Update - The article was changed from the original form. Any involved parties may want to view the live article, or historical versions of the article while taking part in this discussion. Also, the author of the article (User: Fbjohnson) appears to have a WP:COI, as their initial edit was a (wrongly formatted) redirect from the Back to Basics Tour to the self-created Belle Johnson article [1]. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 05:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.