Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Six (album)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:20, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Big Six (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The album fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. It has not gained any significant coverage in reliable sources whatsoever. Of the four references cited in the article, three of them are unreliable. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 15:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
This album is not out yet, additional citation will be added when its out on the 6th of june — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kofipedia (talk • contribs) 03:50, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Nothing significant about the subject was found. @Kofipedia: you should have waited. This article falls in WP:TOOSOON. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 14:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Not finding significant coverage in reliable sources Gab4gab (talk) 17:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.