Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Valley Shockwave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:40, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big Valley Shockwave

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another defunct ABA team with questionable notability. Mattg82 (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm the author, and already I've forgotten about them-just goes to show you how non-notable they turned out to be. Tom Danson (talk) 02:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ORG and doesnt meet WP:GNG.—Bagumba (talk) 16:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Even local coverage is scant with this announcement of the team forming appearing to be the most significant in 2006. It apparently failed part way through the 2008-09 season. -- Whpq (talk) 16:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete/close. Even the author thinks these are non notable. Szzuk (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW delete. Insufficient coverage of this ABA basketball team to fulfill the notability requirements for sports. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 03:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.