Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Mundy (real estate)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Greenfield Advisors. (non-admin closure) Acather96 (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Bill Mundy (real estate) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A person who works in real estate appraisal. Where's the notability? I don't see any. bender235 (talk) 03:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Greenfield Advisors There is enough notability to keep the Greenfield article, but I'm doubtful that Bill Mundy has enough individual notability to sustain a seperate article. Some of the info from Bill Mundy could be merged into the Greenfield article as information about the firm's founder. Monty845 03:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As a matter of fact, Greenfield Advisors barely meets notability criteria either.
I'll probably file an AfD for that article as well.Done. --bender235 (talk) 13:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As a matter of fact, Greenfield Advisors barely meets notability criteria either.
- Delete or Redirect to Greenfield Advisors, I don't see any source showing him as the founder of the mentioned group but if he indeed founded Greenfield Advisors then perhaps merging a short history would be a good idea. Otherwise pretty clear shift + delete. Rmzadeh ► 04:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Delete per the above. No personal notability found outside connection to company. Pudge MclameO (talk) 04:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I originated the article, and I see where it needs some significant "punch up" to bring it up to date. I'll address that in the next few days. Thesurveyor (talk) 04:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.