Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Mars (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 15:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Mars (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another article about an online virtual environment, except it looks almost like an advert in addition to questionable sources. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 19:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Improve instead of delete. I'm not sure why you're being so quick to nominate virtual world articles for deletion instead of opting to improve them. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 15:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete zero evidence of independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 01:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't find any reliable, independent sources. The "game" has been in beta for three and a half years and there's no proper release date. Tigerboy1966 21:07, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- For what it's worth, PlayStation Home has been in beta since December 2008. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 22:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. Independent coverage is out there and not that hard to find:

-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.